Cubed shaped UFO caught on camera by commercial airline pilots

originally posted by: BodhisattvaStyle
a reply to: wavelength

Haha you're welcome, now that song is going to be stuck in my head for the rest of the day.

I was a chef for a good while and we use to play this little mind game with each other where we would home or sing quietly the most annoying song we could think of. The object of the game was to get the song "stuck in their head all night." You would know you had "won that round" because whoever you were doing it to would come to work the next day and curse at you as they laughed and said "dude, I had that horrible song stuck in my head all night long."

Our own little "mind games" to pass the time.

Haha!! Well, it looks like you won this round.
Funny you guys did that because I used to whistle "A Beautiful Day In The Neighborhood" around my colleagues. That one really got to them.

And this one is in my complete ignorance: does a mylar balloon show up on a planes radar? (I am really surprised there actually if it is so) Do birds show up on radar?

Good question!
Yes and no. Balloons typically have a weak radar reflection. Radar would not be able to identify them as balloons, but they may show up as an unidentified 'blip' if at all. Although radar is sensitive enough to "see" large birds, it has filters (generally based on speed) to 'declutter' the screen from birds and other small, slow-moving targets. Metal reflects better; a metallized Mylar balloon would be much more reflective (visible) to radar than, say, a round latex balloon.

Just seems like the object in question would have to be larger than say, basketball or balloon to be visible like that at such a long distance, and especially able to be visible on a phone camera like this. I take a lot of pics. And something at say, 100 yards is pretty much invisible.

Right! The object in the video does not look 18" across by any means. It would have had to be about the size of one of the balloons in the video below. Watch them float off... could be a coincidence but worth noting, this festival occurred in roughly the same area the plane in the OP was flying over. If it was a balloon, it would've had to have been one from one of these festivals. It's no birthday balloon.

originally posted by: wavelength

originally posted by: BodhisattvaStyle
a reply to: wavelength

Haha you're welcome, now that song is going to be stuck in my head for the rest of the day.

I was a chef for a good while and we use to play this little mind game with each other where we would home or sing quietly the most annoying song we could think of. The object of the game was to get the song "stuck in their head all night." You would know you had "won that round" because whoever you were doing it to would come to work the next day and curse at you as they laughed and said "dude, I had that horrible song stuck in my head all night long."

Our own little "mind games" to pass the time.

Haha!! Well, it looks like you won this round.

Funny you guys did that because I used to whistle "A Beautiful Day In The Neighborhood" around my colleagues. That one really got to them.

And this one is in my complete ignorance: does a mylar balloon show up on a planes radar? (I am really surprised there actually if it is so) Do birds show up on radar?

Good question!
Yes and no. Balloons typically have a weak radar reflection. Radar would not be able to identify them as balloons, but they may show up as an unidentified 'blip' if at all. Although radar is sensitive enough to "see" large birds, it has filters (generally based on speed) to 'declutter' the screen from birds and other small, slow-moving targets. Metal reflects better; a metallized Mylar balloon would be much more reflective (visible) to radar than, say, a round latex balloon.

Just seems like the object in question would have to be larger than say, basketball or balloon to be visible like that at such a long distance, and especially able to be visible on a phone camera like this. I take a lot of pics. And something at say, 100 yards is pretty much invisible.

Right! The object in the video does not look 18" across by any means. It would have had to be about the size of one of the balloons in the video below. Watch them float off... could be a coincidence but worth noting, this festival occurred in roughly the same area the plane in the OP was flying over. If it was a balloon, it would've had to have been one from one of these festivals. It's no birthday balloon.

That actually tracks with me, wavelength. Youve at least sold me on the possibility of the balloon when I was in full doubt of it being that. I'm not easy to sway either. You earned that one. 💪

Seamines, landmines,..

Skymines!

It's definitely not a pigeon.

Here's a short video showing how difficult it can be for a pilot [or passenger] to identify a balloon in the skies from a distance.

a reply to: BodhisattvaStyle

once again Star TRek was accurate in predictions, its the Borg!

a reply to: BodhisattvaStyle

I am of the opinion that the USA has reversesd engineered alien technology as far back as 1989. Robert Lazer filmed it in the desert back then. He also said that it could perform radical manuevors. I witnessed same back in 2018 in South Carolina along with several others. Also I am in contact with other ATS members living in this state as all of us have seen and filmed much weird. I sent the video into The Black Vault in 2018. Their investigator emailed back that under enhanced imagery they are seeing a trianglar shape. They sent me it and I posted here on a Post or Thread.

Under the above assumption along with being over drug cartel ground zero that could be an INTEL gathering whatever. I enhanced the image and see a small ionized atmosphere around the object. The film doesnt appear to be fake.

Whatever

a reply to: Waterglass

You mentioning technology made me think of having watched a video on copper spirals sticking out of the soil to produce bigger vegetables made me end up buying tiny electronic components I need to stick in the soil.

originally posted by: BodhisattvaStyle

originally posted by: Ophiuchus1
Easy Peasy….

Starboard = Left side if viewing front of aircraft cockpit head on.
Starboard = Right side if sitting in the aircraft cockpit looking forward.

Port = Right side if viewing front of aircraft cockpit head on.
Port = Left side if sitting in the aircraft cockpit looking forward.

👽

Nice
And yeah, something I actually had to Google real quick. Lol

I did notice there was a difference in what the port side vs the starboard side was depending on point of reference.
Made it somewhat more confusing for me.
Thanks for the exact clarification for us.

Actually it's the complete opposite. Port is always port and starboard is always starboard, regardless of your point of reference. That's the entire point of their usage. It's to avoid confusion with someone saying "Right!" and you not knowing whether they mean their right or your right if you are both oriented different. No matter your orientation or point of reference, the starboard side of the ship or aircraft is always the starboard side.

originally posted by: mirageman
Here's a short video showing how difficult it can be for a pilot [or passenger] to identify a balloon in the skies from a distance.

What an idiot. Dude should lose his license over that.

🥴

Notice the six exhaust ports and the five viewing portholes for the crew….
👽

originally posted by: Ophiuchus1
🥴

Notice the six exhaust ports and the five viewing portholes for the crew….
👽

I was thinking that (if this really is from the video) this looks like a dice. Except that the dots are running perpendicular to Casino dice.



However, that doesn't mean someone has to follow the rules when making a dice balloon.
Has anyone tried calculating the closer rate?
Maybe 462 / 60 / 60 = 0.12 NM per second, is the speed of the Airbus. So the UAP was approx 5NM away.

a reply to: BodhisattvaStyle

"but this one is moving way too fast"

You have no idea how fast this is moving.

Please read up on relativity and how it applies to velocity.

originally posted by: ziplock9000
a reply to: BodhisattvaStyle

"but this one is moving way too fast"

You have no idea how fast this is moving.

Please read up on relativity and how it applies to velocity.

Since you know how to do this, please calculate the closure rate and speed of this UAP.
Have you tried calculating the closer rate?
Maybe 462 / 60 / 60 = 0.12 NM per second, is the speed of the Airbus. So the UAP was approx 5NM away.

a reply to: BernnieJGato

Really? Reeeeally? 🙄

a reply to: BernnieJGato

Really? Reeeeally? 🙄

QUOTE:
______________
Also, the fake vid argument. I have a question for it:
How, with all the tech the government has can't spot a fake video, but random ATS members can? Why would the History Channel spend all that time effort and money to run an episode of a balloon in the sky? Seems like they (big brother) would be smart enough to know we can spot a fake video.
Show me the proof it's fake. I'll digress completely. Has to be able to be verified though.
____________________________________


History Channel will run anything to make a buck.
Sure the govt has the means & people to spot a fake video but why would they? Unless backed into a wall due to massive public outcry or forced they have no incentive to do anything. More importantly they aren't mandated or funded to police the internet for fake/CGI UAP/UFO video's.
Of course Big brother or whoever knows there's a herd of people who can tell the difference between fake & something that is legit enough to remain unknown. Again why would they care? It keeps us busy over here in cyberspace not pestering them.

The aircraft running over the patchwork balloon was excellent!
Very glad it didn't get sucked into a engine. Nothings slaps you in the face like "Hey!!! that UFO has a string!!!"

a reply to: Untun

Are you married and wear a gold ring? I do and that finger is smaller than the others except the pinkys. Less inflammation?