It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by BillHicksRules
Rogue,
The sensors and weapons fits are more capable than those on the Virginia for the task they are for.
I will give you the fact that they will not carry Tomahawks but that is not part of their tasking.
On a sub v sub engagement they will outmatch the Virginias even in a blue water scenario. The only thing the SSNs have on them is range in a long term pursuit but in that case it is a win for the AIP boat.
Originally posted by deltaboy
with the Virginia class subs design for both deep and coastal operations the advantage for the diesel and electric subs would be negligible.
Originally posted by BillHicksRules
I will give you the fact that they will not carry Tomahawks but that is not part of their tasking.
Firstly the RN is not going to fight a straight battle...most likely get the american sub to give chase and bring it to the costal subs..
Westy your thinking of a large scale submarine on submarine conflict...that doesnt happen... Imagine dozens of subs running around in the atlantic unable to tell friend from foe...well you can if you really listen but by that time the other guy is listening and thinking the same thing "is this guy a bad guy?"
Originally posted by WestPoint23
You think were that stupid? There is no need for us to chace you to costal waters as long as you can operate in blue water and sink ships enjoy your costal waters.
Remember WWII, I think it happened. Also in WWII we seemed to know which subs were which and that was 65 years ago the tech back then was crap compared to now.
.
Yes actually....its not a question of stupidity but a question of wether or not a US sub commander is willing to allow a UK sub to play around in his front garden
Oh and BTW sinking civilains is illegal and called piracy...are you calling the US navy pirates?
Originally posted by WestPoint23
He would not put his Sub in danger because of primitive instincts. Winning the war and accomplishing your objectives trumps territorial pride IMO.
[/qoute]
He would because he is designated to guard that area...if he lets an enemy sub run wild that sub can sink lots of friendly ships..
I’m talking about Navy ships, unless you plan to use your subs for nothing other than trying to cause damage to U.S. subs.
We are talking sub on sub tactics here...if you want to include forign forces then your forces have a big problem..