Bombshell - Covid-19 Shares 19 Letter Sequence That Matches Moderna Patent From 2016

originally posted by: flice

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Yawn.

This simply adds weight to the argument that covid is naturally occurring.

All they've done is found that it's genetically similar to a strain of coronavirus that was previously identified I horseshoe bat's in China and Vietnam during the 2010s.

Your simply trying to twist something that we already know to make it sound like doom porn.

The odds that you quote vanish once you take I to consideration that it might be a close relative of covid 19, as they only apply to a virus evolving those characteristics independently. The odds are much better once you consider a common ancestry.

And from the Wuhan labs own research from that time, it shows that those SPECIFIC bats only live around 1.500 km from Wuhan.
The Wuhan bats do not carry those genes.

So there is only one way those bats got to Wuhan and that the spread started there.......

Bats... Can fly.

It took several years to reach wuhan and mutated at least twice on the way.

originally posted by: flice
a reply to: AaarghZombies

NO... that is factually WRONG.

If by local you meant entire China, then yes, but "local"... could easily be interpreted as "Wuhan" or "just around Wuhan".

When in fact the Wuhan lab was all over the place to research and collect samples.

Again... the bats when the ability to transmit to humans live 1.500 km from Wuhan. This is fact.

You're looking at data from about 5 years beforehand.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

You

China stopped its own nationals from leaving. It was foreign nationals governments who let covid in.

While China was playing “I have a secret”?

China failed to warn public of coronavirus threat for days: AP

www.aljazeera.com...

How China locked down internally for COVID-19, but pushed foreign travel

economictimes.indiatimes.com...

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: AaarghZombies

You

Gain of function research was denied funding and never actually carried out at that lab.

NIH admits US funded gain-of-function in Wuhan — despite Fauci’s denials
nypost.com...

May 1, 2020 5:50 pm

The Newsweek report revealed an alarming tidbit: The Wuhan lab at the center of the controversy had for years been engaged in gain-of-function research. What exactly is it? It’s a line of research where scientists take viruses and study how they might be modified to become deadlier or more transmissible. Why would they do this? Scientists who engage in such research say it helps them figure out which viruses threaten people so they can design countermeasures.

www.vox.com...

Dude, why do you have to lie to kick it…

The people who wrote those articles were wrong. Plain and simple. They aren't scientists and they mistakenly called something entirely different Gain of Function.

What is being described dies not meet the criteria of gain of function. Fauci corrected this in Congress.

It's like AOC calling anything that look similar to an Ar15 an assault rifle, even if its bolt action or airsoft. She said it, but she does not know what she's talking about, so liberals can cite her all they like and she's still wrong.

Believe It Or Not, Most Published Research Findings Are Probably False

The claim that “most published research findings are false” is something you might reasonably expect to come out of the mouth of the most deluded kind of tin-foil-hat-wearing-conspiracy-theorist. Indeed, this is a statement oft-used by fans of pseudoscience who take the claim at face value, without applying the principles behind it to their own evidence. It is however, a concept that is actually increasingly well understood by scientists. It is the title of a paper written 10 years ago by the legendary Stanford epidemiologist John Ioannidis. The paper, which has become the most widely cited paper ever published in the journal PLoS Medicine, examined how issues currently ingrained in the scientific process combined with the way we currently interpret statistical significance, means that at present, most published findings are likely to be incorrect......

a reply to: AaarghZombies

You

The people who wrote those articles were wrong. Plain and simple.

Have any evidence or logically structured argument they are wrong other than your blind because your head is stuck up big governments a$$?

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: neutronflux

In that a virus became rampant in a city that happens to do research on coronavirus that happens to have a sequence that allows for gain of function from past research to kick off the first pandemic of this magnitude in about a 100 years. With how many covid pandemics before covid 19? Then China allowed people to travel out of China to spread covid 19, some sea wall.

There have been multiple coronavirus outbreaks, Sara and mers are just two examples..

Again the weasel words reply.
He asked how many coronavirus pandemics before,not outbreaks.
You well know the difference so why the weasel words of your reply?

originally posted by: glen200376

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: neutronflux

In that a virus became rampant in a city that happens to do research on coronavirus that happens to have a sequence that allows for gain of function from past research to kick off the first pandemic of this magnitude in about a 100 years. With how many covid pandemics before covid 19? Then China allowed people to travel out of China to spread covid 19, some sea wall.

There have been multiple coronavirus outbreaks, Sara and mers are just two examples..

Again the weasel words reply.
He asked how many coronavirus pandemics before,not outbreaks.
You well know the difference so why the weasel words of your reply?

That happen to originate from a city doing gain of function research on the same type of virus?

That happens to contain a genetic sequence from past manipulated research?

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Yawn.

This simply adds weight to the argument that covid is naturally occurring.

All they've done is found that it's genetically similar to a strain of coronavirus that was previously identified I horseshoe bat's in China and Vietnam during the 2010s.

Your simply trying to twist something that we already know to make it sound like doom porn.

The odds that you quote vanish once you take I to consideration that it might be a close relative of covid 19, as they only apply to a virus evolving those characteristics independently. The odds are much better once you consider a common ancestry.

Your handlers must be very proud. Your persistence is noted, and I'm sure a promotion is in your future. I don't go down the "Paid Shill" road often, but when enough evidence emerges, and the boots have all been licked clean, there really is no other way to go.

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: AaarghZombies

You

China stopped its own nationals from leaving. It was foreign nationals governments who let covid in.

While China was playing “I have a secret”?

China failed to warn public of coronavirus threat for days: AP

www.aljazeera.com...

How China locked down internally for COVID-19, but pushed foreign travel

economictimes.indiatimes.com...

Which proves what we already knew, that the Chinese government does not have all the answers.

Local officials were afraid of being blamed so they downplayed thing to the central government.

Never blame on malice that which is is more likely down to incompetence.

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Yawn.

This simply adds weight to the argument that covid is naturally occurring.

All they've done is found that it's genetically similar to a strain of coronavirus that was previously identified I horseshoe bat's in China and Vietnam during the 2010s.

Your simply trying to twist something that we already know to make it sound like doom porn.

The odds that you quote vanish once you take I to consideration that it might be a close relative of covid 19, as they only apply to a virus evolving those characteristics independently. The odds are much better once you consider a common ancestry.

Your handlers must be very proud. Your persistence is noted, and I'm sure a promotion is in your future. I don't go down the "Paid Shill" road often, but when enough evidence emerges, and the boots have all been licked clean, there really is no other way to go.

And of course you aren't making money hand over fist from click bait ads on you blog.

originally posted by: neutronflux

originally posted by: glen200376

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: neutronflux

In that a virus became rampant in a city that happens to do research on coronavirus that happens to have a sequence that allows for gain of function from past research to kick off the first pandemic of this magnitude in about a 100 years. With how many covid pandemics before covid 19? Then China allowed people to travel out of China to spread covid 19, some sea wall.

There have been multiple coronavirus outbreaks, Sara and mers are just two examples..

Again the weasel words reply.
He asked how many coronavirus pandemics before,not outbreaks.
You well know the difference so why the weasel words of your reply?

That happen to originate from a city doing gain of function research on the same type of virus?

That happens to contain a genetic sequence from past manipulated research?

Except it wasn't gain of function. People who don't know what gain of function is merely mislabelled it.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Yawn.

This simply adds weight to the argument that covid is naturally occurring.

All they've done is found that it's genetically similar to a strain of coronavirus that was previously identified I horseshoe bat's in China and Vietnam during the 2010s.

Your simply trying to twist something that we already know to make it sound like doom porn.

The odds that you quote vanish once you take I to consideration that it might be a close relative of covid 19, as they only apply to a virus evolving those characteristics independently. The odds are much better once you consider a common ancestry.

Your handlers must be very proud. Your persistence is noted, and I'm sure a promotion is in your future. I don't go down the "Paid Shill" road often, but when enough evidence emerges, and the boots have all been licked clean, there really is no other way to go.

And of course you aren't making money hand over fist from click bait ads on you blog.

LOL, what is my blog? And thanks for the confirmation. Work hard, save harder.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: neutronflux

originally posted by: glen200376

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: neutronflux

In that a virus became rampant in a city that happens to do research on coronavirus that happens to have a sequence that allows for gain of function from past research to kick off the first pandemic of this magnitude in about a 100 years. With how many covid pandemics before covid 19? Then China allowed people to travel out of China to spread covid 19, some sea wall.

There have been multiple coronavirus outbreaks, Sara and mers are just two examples..

Again the weasel words reply.
He asked how many coronavirus pandemics before,not outbreaks.
You well know the difference so why the weasel words of your reply?

That happen to originate from a city doing gain of function research on the same type of virus?

That happens to contain a genetic sequence from past manipulated research?

Except it wasn't gain of function. People who don't know what gain of function is merely mislabelled it.

The people who do this kind of work, are the one's who admitted it. The NIH. It's time for the B team, you aren't getting it done son.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

You

Except it wasn't gain of function.

Then what research were they doing that couldn’t be done in the USA that was being funded by the USA?

We're becoming increasingly anti-semantic

Redefined what a pandemic is, what a vaccine is, what the vaccine is supposed to do, how many you are supposed to take

Now it's not gain of function in the sense that you think it's different

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Yawn.

This simply adds weight to the argument that covid is naturally occurring.

All they've done is found that it's genetically similar to a strain of coronavirus that was previously identified I horseshoe bat's in China and Vietnam during the 2010s.

Your simply trying to twist something that we already know to make it sound like doom porn.

The odds that you quote vanish once you take I to consideration that it might be a close relative of covid 19, as they only apply to a virus evolving those characteristics independently. The odds are much better once you consider a common ancestry.

Yes, the furin cleavage site naturally evolved to match the sequence in a Moderna patent. Of course that happened naturally even if the odds are 1 in 3 trillion.

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Yawn.

This simply adds weight to the argument that covid is naturally occurring.

All they've done is found that it's genetically similar to a strain of coronavirus that was previously identified I horseshoe bat's in China and Vietnam during the 2010s.

Your simply trying to twist something that we already know to make it sound like doom porn.

The odds that you quote vanish once you take I to consideration that it might be a close relative of covid 19, as they only apply to a virus evolving those characteristics independently. The odds are much better once you consider a common ancestry.

Your handlers must be very proud. Your persistence is noted, and I'm sure a promotion is in your future. I don't go down the "Paid Shill" road often, but when enough evidence emerges, and the boots have all been licked clean, there really is no other way to go.

Persistent, yes. Convincing? LOL. If getting picked apart every thread is his goal then yes maybe a promotion is in order. I have a feeling he comes here to act retarded for free though.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Yawn.

This simply adds weight to the argument that covid is naturally occurring.

The virus is naturally occurring it's been around for centuries, that's common knowledge. The point of this thread is to show how a naturally occurring virus can be artificially sequenced. If you don't agree that a common virus can be re sequenced then fair enough but that's not your narrative is it.
Shill.

originally posted by: Madviking
I had this in my recent post as a secondary note on lab origins.

I feel like this, if true, is very strong scientific evidence pointing to origins other than zoonotic/natural of Covid 19. I don't know how they spin this? Ignore it most likely.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

A Formal Investigation needs to be held, followed by trials, while the perpetrators are still alive, and the before the statutes of limitations expire. (That's what's Durham is up against in his investigation/prosecutions)