It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Bluntone22
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
If your employer has no right to your records, then it's your word.
No employer has a right to your medical records.
But they don't have to employ you either
Is it legal to request a doctor’s note from an employee?
The simple answer is yes – employers in the United States have the right to request a return-to-work or doctor’s note to verify that their workers are ill or why they can’t report for a prolonged period of time.
Companies may also require this document in order to provide accommodations in the workplace for employees with physical limitations, chronic health conditions, or disabilities.
However, your sick note policy should not infringe on anyone’s right to medical privacy and protection from discrimination.
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits employers from “making inquiries into the disabilities of their employees unless it is job-related and necessary for the conduct of business,” says the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).
The EEOC also states that workers are not required to submit medical records of their illnesses to their employers. You also can’t terminate someone in retaliation if they refuse to disclose specific details about their health.
A good example is the disability discrimination lawsuit filed by the EEOC in 2008 against the retail chain Dillard’s Inc. The company had a longstanding policy that required all its workers to disclose confidential and personal medical information to have their sick leaves approved.
Moreover, Dillard’s fired several workers in retaliation because they refused to provide details of their medical conditions. The company ended up paying $2 million to settle the class action lawsuit in a three-year consent decree.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: drewlander
Yeah in most states you can terminate employment for any or no reason but it does not mean the employee cannot file for unemployment. If they did file you would have to prove "willful negligence" or something to get out of paying.
I suppose but who wants to be on unemployment? It pays like crap.
originally posted by: sapien82
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
im not sure on employment law in the states but dont the Unions have anything to say about this stuff ?
im just waiting for my work to # this up so i can take a case to my union and then to an employment tribunal
originally posted by: JIMC5499
a reply to: MykeNukem
I sometimes work around high voltage, high amperage equipment. There is a list of medications that I am required to report if I am proscribed them. This has nothing to do with my employer being nosy, it is about safety. If I am proscribed anything on the list, I'm not allowed in certain areas or to do certain tasks. This is in my contract and there are protections against losing my job over this. If I do not report this, I can be terminated immediately.
originally posted by: JIMC5499
a reply to: MykeNukem
I sometimes work around high voltage, high amperage equipment. There is a list of medications that I am required to report if I am proscribed them. This has nothing to do with my employer being nosy, it is about safety. If I am proscribed anything on the list, I'm not allowed in certain areas or to do certain tasks. This is in my contract and there are protections against losing my job over this. If I do not report this, I can be terminated immediately.
originally posted by: drewlander
I feel that you percieve this as a one-sided situation where 100% of businesses will force a mandate and employees who decline will have nowhere else to go.
originally posted by: JIMC5499
originally posted by: sapien82
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
im not sure on employment law in the states but dont the Unions have anything to say about this stuff ?
im just waiting for my work to # this up so i can take a case to my union and then to an employment tribunal
I've got $20 that says your Union rolls over to have it's belly scratched by the Government.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: panoz77
That's well below the median income.
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: MykeNukem
Okay, but the OP asked about HIPAA, and HIPAA is all about medical records, hence my posts.
I'll show myself out.
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: MykeNukem
Oh, sure you can provide the information to an employer, but your doctor absolutely cannot confirm nor deny any of the information you provide to your employer.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: panoz77
The median income for Ohio, $56,000, is above that.
If you want to start to get micro-regional, like picking Warren, Ohio in this case, your data is worthless since it is anecdotally applied to this specific area and it doesn't reflect society as a whole.
Additionally, your unemployment payout is based on your previous salary, if you made dirt before you aren't getting a maximum payout from unemployment.