It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: carsforkids
And I think it's clear which is more credible.
originally posted by: carsforkids
a reply to: Xtrozero
I was wondering if you missed this? It says everything I don't
articulate as well as Stephen Meyer.
originally posted by: carsforkids
a reply to: Xtrozero
I thought it was a good debate where the proponent of
design wasn't hung out to dry in theology. I realized that
you never used Darwinism. I just can't even repeat a lot
of what was said very well but I did understand. And do
understand that evolution has come far from Darwinism.
m not saying that intelligent design could not happen, just that it was not needed.
Potential energy is as real as kinetic energy. The idea is that the energy gets stored in the fields that produce the force, and that the energy is transferred between kinetic energy and field energy
originally posted by: Xtrozero
The debate would be intelligent design vs random act that work around basic rules/law/actions that a random universe might have.
originally posted by: Phantom423
a reply to: cooperton
More bs. Nature tends toward equilibrium. That is when the vector sum of all forces is equal to zero. The laws of nature are the balance of nature, or homeostasis. No creature from outer space or from another dimension is required. It's the natural state of this universe.
Crap in, crap out = YOU.
originally posted by: cooperton
Would you agree that intelligible laws insist upon a Law-maker?
These intelligible laws perpetuate all of creation in a consistent equilibrium which allows life to continue seamlessly.
originally posted by: cooperton
Surely these laws were created by a Law-maker... or at the very least, it is astronomically more probably that intelligible systems are derived from intelligence rather than unintelligence. Just like it is astronomically more likely that a Ford truck came from a Ford factory, rather than random chance putting it together. You can go ahead and believe in your unintelligent design, but know it is remarkably the less probable option
originally posted by: rom12345
so in other words you or I are not intelligent, it's just the result of random chemistry.
I don't buy it.
for me, that a solar system will settle into harmonic resonance, and produce human intelligence, is indistinguishable from the 'intelligence.' of God.
originally posted by: rom12345
a reply to: Xtrozero
They are not only intelligent to varying degrees, as far as I am concerned they are manifested spiritual entities.
In my view the Universal purpose is to provide the physics and chemistry for the evolution of spiritual forces
There are things that can be subjectively experienced, that provide very compelling evidence that what we consider consciousness and intelligence, go way further than we can fathom.
I certainly value the scientific method and science, but it has come to my attention that physical reality is only the tip of the ice berg, so to speak.
It seems impossible to share this subjective evidence in scientific terms, only psycho-spiritual terms, if even.
What is most certain to me, is that human intelligence is only a tiny fraction of a cosmically larger one, that lies outside space and time.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
The word law means nothing in this case