A lot has been said about how the narrative related to the Chinese flu seems to be shifting and changing almost daily. Oh, I've been listening. The
conflicting information is no accident, nor is it due to incompetence; it is purposeful and programmed.
Now, we hear on a daily basis ... Use a mask ... Wait, masks won't do any good ... Or maybe they will ... Wear one anyway ... Oh, no! Millions will
die ... Wait, the mortality rate is lower than we thought ... Wait, it's higher ... Asymptomatic transmission is a grave danger ... Wait, maybe it's
not ... It can live on surfaces for an extended period ... Wait, not it can't ... It's a novel virus and nobody has immunity .. Wait, some people
might have immunity ... Once you catch it, you'll be immune to a second infection ... Wait, maybe you won't ... Or maybe you will ... Shutting down
the economy will save lives ... Wait, maybe it'll do more harm than good, but do it anyway ... Follow our models even if they are wrong ... BUT MOST
IMPORTANTLY, surrender all claim to civil liberties and self-determination to save yourselves.
I've been listening, and I have recognized something. The incessant stream of changing and conflicting information is no accident, nor is it due to
incompetence; I am convinced that it is purposeful and programmed. I have seen this strategy played out on a small scale in corporate and even group
settings. In deed, I worked for years in a ministry where this exact control tactic was employed and was very effective. I have seen "leaders"
intentionally keep people in a state of uncertainty in order to keep them psychologically and emotionally dependent on those who present themselves as
being "in control."
You see, when people are faced with a constantly shifting informational environment, being intentionally pushed into a state of uncertainty, they
become confused and feel insecure. Uncertainty, insecurity and confusion induce a sense of fear in most people; that fear makes people manipulable as
they grasp at anything that seems to offer stability in this ever-shifting sea; they become more inclined to do whatever they are told without regard
to reason and simply on the basis of giving them some fixed point to anchor onto; this includes the abandoning their own right, legal and inalienable
liberty for the illusion of stability or security. They look to anyone who claims to be an "authority" as a source of stability. As long as the
"authority" can continue to induce an unstable environment and gaslight its victims into not realizing where the instability comes from, that same
authority can tighten control as the fearful become ever more susceptible to whatever promises of safety are made, regardless of how ineffective they
really are. Greater promises of stability elevate expectations; elevated expectations are dashed; dashed expectations cause people to grasp for more
control to impose more order over more chaos. Many people become that desperate for a sense of security and stability that they will ultimately submit
to anything. This is the beginning of a state of group or social psychosis that will be used and amplified to increase and maintain control.
In their fear, the masses are told that anybody who does not exhibit evidence of fear and fear induced submission is a threat to the group, so the
fearful become useful as tools of those in power to control and manipulate those who won't submit to the control tactics, reporting incidents of
fear-non-compliance to the "appropriate authorities" and attempting to badger the non-compliant into fear submission.
In short, the induction of a sense of universal uncertainty induces a group or societal psychosis that breaks down first the weaker and more timid,
then spreads out from them to break down relationships, then group or societal cohesiveness, resulting in a society that cannot care for itself or
protect its own rights, coming under the complete control of those who proclaim themselves "leaders," "experts," or "authorities."
Again, I have watched this played out methodically in corporate and group settings many times. I worked for years in an organization where this
methodology was employed with much success. The very few who understood what was happening and became unwilling to just "play along" were seen as
threats, were ostracized and marginalized, and were usually eventually forced out. As I watch what's happening on a societal and global level, it is
all so very familiar. I have no doubt that this is being done intentionally by people who understand the principles.
But, you know, I'm just a selfish so-and-so who doesn't care about the chiiiiiiiiildren and I don't realize that BIG BROTHER REALLY DOES LOVE ME!and
even ministerial settings, where people are intentionally kept in a state of uncertainty in order to keep them psychologically and emotionally
dependent on those who present themselves as being "in control."
edit on 2020 5 25 by incoserv because: I'm a bit anal about my