It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

OIG Report on FISA Abuse Released

page: 10
37
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 12 2019 @ 11:57 AM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: tanstaafl
I already accepted your terms.

Now you are trying to change them.


Oh well, those are the breaks.

Ok, so we're back to the original terms.

Thanks. I look forward to being paid in a timely fashion should I win.




posted on Dec, 12 2019 @ 12:08 PM
link   
a reply to: tanstaafl

Wow, that's some linear thinking there.

(PS, I'm going to catch your last two responses here to save time if you don't mind.)

Using the "you bought into the MSM" counter is so old and tired, you guys need to find new material, frankly.

You guys hinged so much on this report, and got nothing. Now you're hinging on Durham, and trust me, given that you seem to think Obama might be in play tells me that you're either fantasizing or merely pushing narrative.

Procedural errors are not going to put anyone in jail. An incompetent atty kept in the dark may be scapegoated.

And McCabe. He's really pissed in someone's Wheaties along the line; they want blood.



posted on Dec, 12 2019 @ 12:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
You guys hinged so much on this report, and got nothing.

Nothing? Nothing!?!?


Now you're hinging on Durham

Ummm... I'm not sure what you mean. Everyone knows that Horowitz - the DOJ IG - has zero power to indict anyone.

Everyone also knows that Durham does.

The action - the results - the indictments - have always - always - been coming from Durham.


and trust me, given that you seem to think Obama might be in play tells me that you're either fantasizing or merely pushing narrative.

I quote:

"'POTUS wants to know everything we're doing'" Text from Lisa Paige to Peter Strzok.

Clapper (CNN Interview): "It’s kind of disconcerting now to be investigated for, you know, having done our duty and done what we were told to do by the president."

Yeah, just pushing a narrative.

Sorry, thats what the demwits do. They are good at it too, I'll give them that.


Procedural errors are not going to put anyone in jail.

I agree - but these were far from mere 'procedural errors'.

As silly would say: Read the report.



posted on Dec, 12 2019 @ 12:30 PM
link   
a reply to: tanstaafl

/yawn

Let us know when the Next Big Thing comes along that's going to answer all your dreams of political vengeance.



posted on Dec, 12 2019 @ 12:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: elDooberino
a reply to: tanstaafl

I'd say you made a good bet.

Klinesmith, at the very least, will probably be charged.


Like he did the email edit solely by himself for no reason. He should be pretty easy to flip as they have him right dead to rights and will easily do some time unless he squeals like a pig.



posted on Dec, 12 2019 @ 12:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
Let us know when the Next Big Thing comes along that's going to answer all your dreams of political vengeance.

I have never been on any of the NBG (next big thing) trains.

No one knows when Durham will start unsealing/issuing indictments except Durham, or when or even if he will ever 'issue a report'. He is a Prosecutor. Prosecutors don't generally 'issue reports', they prosecute criminals. Reports are what IGs do.

Tick-tock.



posted on Dec, 12 2019 @ 01:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

/yawn

Let us know when the Next Big Thing comes along that's going to answer all your dreams of political vengeance.


There is a lot going on here but I can give you just one biggie of many. On Page's initial investigation the email that was falsified to read "is not" on the CIA's payroll from "is" started it all off...just that one change turned Page into a possible enemy of the State from a CIA asset.

If you find that a /yawn too then I'm not sure what to say.



posted on Dec, 12 2019 @ 05:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: tanstaafl
Ok, so we're back to the original terms.


Not really.



posted on Dec, 12 2019 @ 05:18 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66



Procedural errors

Oh, that’s what you call it.



posted on Dec, 12 2019 @ 05:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: tanstaafl
I will bet you $1,000. Right now.


Done. I expect to be paid when no one of any consequence gets indicted.


Hi guys.

"No one of any consequence" is rather a subjective premise, no?

Where is the line drawn?
Is it Wray?
Sjtrok?
Mccabe?

I think if Joe blow the plumber goes to jail, he is someone of consequence- if my toilet is clogged.

Anticipating a good flush in the process!

Feeling irreverent is cause for me to apologize for interrupting your discussion.

edit on (12/12/1919 by loveguy because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 12 2019 @ 05:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: tanstaafl

/yawn

Let us know when the Next Big Thing comes along that's going to answer all your dreams of political vengeance.


Here is a preview.

The cia got ally countries to use their intelligence assets to set up papadapolous and most likely others as a way to have a basis to start the fbi investigation. They also used five eyes to illegally surveill Trump campaign members.

Durham knows this Because he has talked to the Italians and Australians and they ratted out the cia.

It is all but a guarantee the order to do this came from Obama.



posted on Dec, 12 2019 @ 07:10 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66




Procedural errors


Egregious violations of civil rights are not mere 'procedural errors'.



posted on Dec, 12 2019 @ 08:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: shooterbrody
does the ig do that?


No, Good-For-Two-Things Barr does that, which he won't.

Careful
Lots of crow on this site
I hear its not so tasty



posted on Dec, 13 2019 @ 05:38 AM
link   

originally posted by: loveguy
"No one of any consequence" is rather a subjective premise, no?


Someone of recognizable name in the current political discussion, unlike your plumber.



posted on Dec, 13 2019 @ 05:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
Lots of crow on this site
I hear its not so tasty


Yeah, yeah, tick tock, tick tock.

*vaping smoke GIF*



posted on Dec, 13 2019 @ 06:16 AM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Where is Foxy anyway. Have not seen his vaping girlfriend in forever.



posted on Dec, 13 2019 @ 08:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
Not really.

Careful. You need to be clear, before I respond.

I will even allow for the unilateral after-the-fact modification of the terms you attempted:

Original terms:

"Prediction: Despite the Q-LARPing and tick tocking there will be no meaningful charges filed against anyone."

New terms:

"Prediction: Despite the Q-LARPing and tick tocking there will be no meaningful charges filed against anyone of consequence."

Now... are you or are you not backing out of our bet?



posted on Dec, 13 2019 @ 08:42 AM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
Speak of crow
Look who appears

Seems potus was wiretapped...
No?



posted on Dec, 13 2019 @ 08:48 AM
link   
a reply to: tanstaafl
Seems those statements weren't so serious?
Alligator mouth and all that.....



posted on Dec, 13 2019 @ 09:05 AM
link   
a reply to: tanstaafl

You don't like my terms find a bookie to lay off on.



new topics

top topics



 
37
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join