OIG Report on FISA Abuse Released

originally posted by: machineintelligence
The judge coming out yesterday and reporting that the FISC court was outright lied to for the purpose of illegal wiretapping on Carter Page and as a result, the Trump campaign is a serious indication of wrongdoing by the FBI at the highest levels. Read it for yourself. This is a clear pattern of misconduct without question.

www.fisc.uscourts.gov...

interesting to see many here completely ignore this
almost as if the dnc talking points of such have not come out yet......

huge historical context as the court has never made this type of statement

originally posted by: shooterbrody
when brennan make an admission of the problems, it wont just be a "low level functionary" that is held accountable

*yawn*

You read the last part of that judge's comments? He lets the FBI offer up reasons why they believe they are not in error. Brennan only has to say, 'We don't feel like we did anything wrong'.

NO ONE OF ANY CONSEQUENCE IS GOING TO JAIL. The only people who can't seem to register this are Q-LARP'ers and people who still believe Trump is draining something.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

NO ONE OF ANY CONSEQUENCE IS GOING TO JAIL.

mkay carnac
you were the one claiming to study history.....

happy holidays

Just a little note:
This is not the first time the FISA Court has rebuked a government agency.

The document, signed by Judge Rosemary M. Collyer, said the court had learned in a notice filed Oct. 26, 2016, that National Security Agency analysts had been conducting prohibited queries of databases “with much greater frequency than had previously been disclosed to the court.” It said a judge chastised the NSA’s inspector general and Office of Compliance for Operations for an “institutional ‘lack of candor’ ” for failing to inform the court. It described the matter as “a very serious Fourth Amendment issue.” The Fourth Amendment protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government, and is a constitutional bedrock protection against intrusion. Parts of the ruling were redacted, including sections that give an indication of the extent of the illegal surveillance, which the NSA told the court in a Jan. 3 notice was partly the fault of “human error” and “system design issues” rather than intentional illegal searches. The NSA inspector general’s office tallied up the number of prohibited searches conducted in a three-month period in 2015, but the number of analysts who made the searches and the number of queries were blacked out in the ruling. Read more here: www.mcclatchydc.com...=cpy

Impact 2020

originally posted by: shooterbrody
mkay carnac

Karnak.

you were the one claiming to study history.....

Which is why I am confident in saying that, you seem to be ignoring history because feelz.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus



-------------------------------

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: machineintelligence
The judge coming out yesterday and reporting that the FISC court was outright lied to for the purpose of illegal wiretapping on Carter Page and as a result, the Trump campaign is a serious indication of wrongdoing by the FBI at the highest levels. Read it for yourself. This is a clear pattern of misconduct without question.

www.fisc.uscourts.gov...

interesting to see many here completely ignore this
almost as if the dnc talking points of such have not come out yet......

huge historical context as the court has never made this type of statement

"Fixing" the process makes it necessary to find out WHY the FISA application contained 17 errors and omissions. That is HUGE!

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Karnak.

tomatoe
tomatoo

Which is why I am confident in saying that, you seem to be ignoring history because feelz.

yeah cause the fisa court has openly and in public called out the fbi previously and challenged their credility?
right?

just a small thing.......


happy holidays

originally posted by: shooterbrody
yeah cause the fisa court has openly and in public called out the fbi previously and challenged their credility?

Yeah, that'll seal the deal. No one's ever lied before or had their 'credibility challenged'.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
Lol
Ignore the actual historical fact that the fisa court called out Obama's fbi.
As crappy as w was he didnt get called out by the fisa court.

Lol

Happy holidays

originally posted by: shooterbrody
Ignore the actual historical fact that the fisa court called out Obama's fbi.

Oh my God! They actually called them out!!

Once again, let me know when someone goes to jail. I'll be here in 2000 and never when that happens.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
Le sigh
I have no doubt you will be here in 2000.

Happy holidays

originally posted by: shooterbrody
I have no doubt you will be here in 2000.

...and never. The same time the indictments come in on anyone notable.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
Is it someone?
Soneone notable?
Of consequence?
Make up your mind....

Happy holidays

originally posted by: shooterbrody
...notable?
...consequence?

These are called, wait for, 'synonyms'. That's a big person word for 'things that mean the same thing'.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
Nice try
Someone may be someone of no consequence

Lol
And your not a big person perhaps simply fat

Happy holidays

originally posted by: shooterbrody
Nice try

Thank you, glad you appreciated the vocabulary lesson.

Here's another one: 'disappointment', the sensation you'll feel when this all leads to nothing, it's akin to being a 'sad panda'.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
You have me confused with your furry friends?
No disappointment here.
We have only just begun.
No wiretaps only a short time ago.
Today a letter from from the fisa court demanding documents from the fbi.
Your poo poo is ineffective.
Not for size or smell tho....

Happy holidays

originally posted by: shooterbrody
You have me confused with your furry friends?

No, I certainly don't have you confused as one of my friends.

Today a letter from from the fisa court demanding documents from the fbi.

Yeah, the famous 'call out'. A public one no less. What could be next? Maybe a 'yo mamma' joke to really teach them a lesson.

Then the inevitable nothing happens. But hey, at least you have Q and the LARP'ing. Tick tock, tick tock.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
Phew
Thanks

Oh I dont particpate in your q club.
Sorry

Happy holidays