It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

OIG Report on FISA Abuse Released

page: 9
37
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 12 2019 @ 08:34 AM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
the increased level of interest here between members is what I was referencing

you did catch the bit when the ig stated the ig report did not vindicate anyone?




posted on Dec, 12 2019 @ 08:57 AM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: tanstaafl
I will bet you $1,000. Right now.


Done. I expect to be paid when no one of any consequence gets indicted.

By the way, you said you'd give me better than 50/50 odds. I assume you meant better than 1:1, so, what are my odds here?
2:1 (meaning, you win, I pay you $1k, I win you pay me $2k)?
3:1?

Just for the record...



posted on Dec, 12 2019 @ 09:33 AM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
you did catch the bit when the ig stated the ig report did not vindicate anyone?

I know I did, and laughed out loud, imagining the demwits claiming it isn't his job to 'vindicate' anyone, after the screaming about how Mueller didn't 'exonerate' Trump.



posted on Dec, 12 2019 @ 09:38 AM
link   
a reply to: tanstaafl
paging mr comey....
paging james comey......



posted on Dec, 12 2019 @ 09:42 AM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: tanstaafl
I will bet you $1,000. Right now.


Done. I expect to be paid when no one of any consequence gets indicted.

Correction, for the record...

The bet is: "there will be no meaningful charges filed against anyone."

Not "no one of any consequence gets indicted.".

Your claim was:

"originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
Prediction: Despite the Q-LARPing and tick tocking there will be no meaningful charges filed against anyone.

Who wants to bet me? I'll even give you better than 50/50 odds."

That is the bet.



posted on Dec, 12 2019 @ 09:58 AM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

I'm catching the part where no one is getting indicted.



posted on Dec, 12 2019 @ 09:59 AM
link   

originally posted by: tanstaafl
By the way, you said you'd give me better than 50/50 odds. I assume you meant better than 1:1, so, what are my odds here?
2:1 (meaning, you win, I pay you $1k, I win you pay me $2k)?
3:1?

Just for the record...


I'll make it 3:1 but let's make this interesting and start the bet at $10,000 on your part.



posted on Dec, 12 2019 @ 10:00 AM
link   
a reply to: tanstaafl

Bet yourself then. Low level people of no consequence are of no interest to anyone, I want the name brands indicted like Trump promised.



posted on Dec, 12 2019 @ 10:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: shooterbrody

I'm catching the part where no one is getting indicted.

does the ig do that?
hmm
all this time I though the ig made recommendations....



posted on Dec, 12 2019 @ 10:16 AM
link   
wow
that was quick




posted on Dec, 12 2019 @ 10:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: shooterbrody

I'm catching the part where no one is getting indicted.

You are confused. IG Horowitz has no power to impanel Gran Juries or issue indictments.

He did make referrals to Durham, and in fact that is Durhams purpose, and what we are waiting for.

I'll decline your offer to increase the existing bet, but...

Am I correct that you are now going back on your word and backing out of the bet unless I allow you to change the terms after the fact, changing 'no one will be indicted' to 'no one of any consequence'?

Whether or not I agree depends... please define 'of any consequence'.



posted on Dec, 12 2019 @ 11:34 AM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
does the ig do that?


No, Good-For-Two-Things Barr does that, which he won't.



posted on Dec, 12 2019 @ 11:35 AM
link   
a reply to: tanstaafl

You don't like my terms go to Vegas or find a bookie.



posted on Dec, 12 2019 @ 11:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: tanstaafl

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
Prediction: Despite the Q-LARPing and tick tocking there will be no meaningful charges filed against anyone.

Who wants to bet me? I'll even give you better than 50/50 odds.

I will bet you $1,000. Right now.

Durham is coming for them. I'm just not sure how far he will be able to take it. Best case is Barry goes down too.


LOL. I'll call your ludicrous raise with one lower level FBI Atty (the "OI" from the report) and maybe McCabe.

If that.



posted on Dec, 12 2019 @ 11:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: tanstaafl

You don't like my terms go to Vegas or find a bookie.


The fantasies that folks tell themselves in echo chambers and amen corners are fascinating.

Not a lot of realism invovled.



posted on Dec, 12 2019 @ 11:49 AM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: tanstaafl

You don't like my terms go to Vegas or find a bookie.

I already accepted your terms.

Now you are trying to change them.

I'm not outright rejecting your requested change, I'm asking for clarification on the meaning of 'person of any consequence'.

Again - are you now backing out of a bet you have already made, here in front of everyone?



posted on Dec, 12 2019 @ 11:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
LOL. I'll call your ludicrous raise with one lower level FBI Atty (the "OI" from the report)

You fell for t he MSM mis-characterization of this higfh-level FBI Attorney as 'low-level'? lol


and maybe McCabe.

Is the Deputy Director of the FBI 'low-level' and/or 'of no consequence' now too?

Rotflmao!



posted on Dec, 12 2019 @ 11:54 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
I'll call your ludicrous raise

Oh - I didn't raise anyone anything.

I made and sealed a bet with Augustus for $1,000.

Terms:

I bet that one or more people will be indicted.

Augustus bets that no one will be indicted.

He has attempted to change these terms after the bet was made, changing 'anyone' to 'anyone of consequence'.

I asked for clarification as to what 'anyone of consequence' means. He has yet to respond, and appears to be trying to weasel out of our firm, agreed upon bet, but hasn't provided a final response yet, so we'll see.



posted on Dec, 12 2019 @ 11:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: tanstaafl
I already accepted your terms.

Now you are trying to change them.


Oh well, those are the breaks.



posted on Dec, 12 2019 @ 11:57 AM
link   

originally posted by: tanstaafl

Yes. I wish I had the time to read and study the report, but thankfully there are enough decent truth seekers out there doing just that that I don't have to do it myself.

Bongino has gone through it with a fine tooth comb, and regardless of the weak carefully worded 'conclusions' in the summary, the actual facts in the report are extremely damning, far worse than I expected.


The guy who changed Page's relationship with the CIA in an email from yes to no is going to jail for a start, AND that is the ball just starting to roll.

Exactly.

KAG 2020, and again in 2024 and 2028 (Don Jr)!


The report is one thing...full of legal type script that most people would not really want to read, BUT Horowitz replies were extremely interesting on both sides of the questioning and in the end he showed there was a huge amount of failures at many levels with in the FBI. To say "significant inaccuracies and omissions" is basically saying they falsified data at a level people can go to jail over, and one just needs to ask why? That why can only lead to anti-Trump agenda, otherwise why even do it in the first place. It is a speculation that is reality but Horowitz made it very clear he would not provide any speculation no matter how easy the path it would have to a conclusion. He did only hard facts...


edit on 12-12-2019 by Xtrozero because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
37
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join