It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: Halfswede
There are a number of ways to use lasers to make an image appear out of seemingly thin air without a backdrop. However, I can't picture a way you could make that same image have enough mass to generate a radar return, at least not one which moves.
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: Jukiodone
Yes, I am acutely aware of this. No it doesn't detect mass, but my point was it needs to reflect off of an object with mass in order to get a return.
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: Jukiodone
Yes, I am acutely aware of this. No it doesn't detect mass, but my point was it needs to reflect off of an object with mass in order to get a return.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: tjocksteffe
Except it isn't. It makes flight safety a little more of a concern, and means the test article has to stay farther away with a more restricted envelope, but there's nothing I've ever seen that says they can't. It's not the best idea, but no reason they can't.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: tjocksteffe
So the guys that wouldn't know about the program then, or now don't think it was a test, so it couldn't be. Definitely has to be aliens then. If they don't think it was a test that's all it could be.
One thing I’m excited about is I had an article recently come out in the American Institute for Aeronautics and Astronautics. It’s a technical organization of engineers, scientists, astronauts, anyone really in the aerospace or astronaut field. I was very excited about that interview because I think those are the type of people that would need to take this seriously and treat it with the scientific rigor that it deserves. Instead of you know, the internet armchair group that doesn’t really understand what you’re looking at. But to have the scientific community looking at this in earnest, I think is a huge leap forward as far as what we’ve seen in the thirty years?
Everyone on the internet is an absolute moron that doesn't know anything.
KR: Yeah, when you see that image of that UFO rotating 90 degrees, as someone that is trained in this field, like, that’s that’s impossible, right? Does that just blow your mind?
RG: It kind of does. I mean, you gotta remember, too…if I was in a jet and I just wanted to drop my wing ninety degrees, I could do that. But I’m also traveling at a certain airspeed where this thing was motionless, essentially, other than the spin. I mean, I guess if I really, really want to…you could probably do some experimenting with the helicopter, right? But it certainly didn’t look like a helicopter. People talked about it being exhaust, which I think, pretty much any pilot that spent any time looking through the FLIR is going to tell you this not an exhaust can. But it’s great for people that, you know, are professional debunkers because it doesn’t matter what the answer is. It matters if they can make it look similar to something that they can recognize. And that’s all the work they have to do. It’s kind of a lazy thing, in my opinion. I could I can show you a wolf and I can show you a dog. It doesn’t mean they’re the exact same animal.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: celltypespecific
Oh of course. Everyone on the internet is an absolute moron that doesn't know anything.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: tjocksteffe
So the guys that wouldn't know about the program then, or now don't think it was a test, so it couldn't be. Definitely has to be aliens then. If they don't think it was a test that's all it could be.