Prince Charles gives the world 18 months to save humanity from climate change

a reply to: Phage

You drive a car. I don't.

I win.

a reply to: Wide-Eyes

I didn't know it was a contest.

originally posted by: Wide-Eyes
The truth is these crusty old bloodlines think they have the right to treat us as serfs. Like fleas that are an irritating parasite on their Earth.

As I said before, I don't care about this particular prince or any other, I was talking about the truth of what was said or not.

I can see why you might relate to them through your posting.

Really? Could you explain how did you came to that conclusion?

a reply to: Phage

Who's the largest fossil fuel burner?

Okay, you win.

a reply to: Wide-Eyes

By which criterion? Per capita or total emissions.

And why does that matter?

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Wide-Eyes

serfs

But most here don't really care to hear what Charles actually was talking about. Because that's no fun.

Why should we ?

Ignoring the EPA that's been in charge of the environment for the last 50 years?

originally posted by: CrazeeWorld777
well, why was it a big headline today then on BING homepage:

www.bing.com

And heres more lniks from BING today:

www.dailytelegraph.com.au...

www.theaustralian.com.au...

That's a different story, not his "18 month" speech on the reception for the Commonwealth Heads of Government Conference at Clarence House, back in July.

And I see you haven't shown where and when did he say that "we have 18 months left on this Earth".

Still waiting.

Edited to add that your second link appears to want me to subscribe to show me the (I suppose) article.

a reply to: neo96

Why should we ?

Ignoring the EPA that's been in charge of the environment for the last 50 years?

Huh?

a reply to: Phage

What Huh ?

Tell us why we just give a snip about what Prince charles or any other FEAR MONGER says about the climate ?

Environment LAWS have existed for over half a century.

A government organization called the EPA enforces those laws.

So WHAT THE EFF are people crying about?

a reply to: neo96

Yeah. Those regulations have/would have done quite a lot to help. Too bad the current administration doesn't like them much.

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: Fallingdown
18 months from today !

That means were all going to die on the Pentecost!!!

I pray this prediction isn’t true . 🙏

Something had to take over for the Mayan Doomsday crapola.

Enter Weathergeddon.

I haven’t heard anyone mention Nibiru in quite a while either . ☠️

a reply to: Phage

It doesn't matter one God damn bit if he doesn't.

If this climate crap was so important maybe those jacksnips in congress should have been trying to pass some instead of trying to get rid of a sitting president for the last three years.

a reply to: neo96

If this climate crap was so important maybe those jacksnips in congress should have been trying to pass some instead of trying to get rid of a sitting president for the last three years.

Yeah. Damn Democrats. You know the Senate has something to do with it, right?
projects.propublica.org...

a reply to: Phage

There's a reason for that.

a reply to: Phage

Yeah DAMN THEM.

Point out the law that says I or anyone else has to believe in cult of climatology?

a reply to: Wide-Eyes

I know. A lot has to do with trying to prop up the coal industry. Production goes down because of reduced demand so you have to make it cheaper by removing regulations in an attempt to boost profits. While demand continues to fall.

a reply to: neo96

Point out the law that says I or anyone else has to believe in cult of climatology?

There isn't one. You can believe anything you wish. No matter how much it ignores the facts.

It's freggin sickening to read this crap.

Getting slapped over the head year after year.

The cult of climatology are nothing short of religious fanatics and call their DOGMA science.

a reply to: Phage

There is nothing wrong with propping up an industry to help families pay taxes.

In fact you've just pointed out that the coal industry has a dwindling demand.

Yay for lower emissions and yay for coal miners! 🙌 🙌

a reply to: Wide-Eyes

There is nothing wrong with propping up an industry to help families pay taxes.

Even it it means increasing pollution levels?
www.nytimes.com...
www.politico.com...