It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Prince Charles gives the world 18 months to save humanity from climate change

page: 3
14
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 23 2019 @ 12:16 PM
link   
Nothing will happen in 18 months from now unless the elitists do something stupid in order to justify their prediction.



posted on Nov, 23 2019 @ 12:37 PM
link   
a reply to: ChefFox

What prediction?



posted on Nov, 23 2019 @ 01:12 PM
link   
a reply to: oloufo

lmfao



posted on Nov, 23 2019 @ 01:14 PM
link   
in 17 months im going to start using her0in!!! they say its great, might as well go out with a bang.



posted on Nov, 23 2019 @ 01:28 PM
link   
"climate change" aka finding out about the gravy train all these deviants are riding on using our labor.



posted on Nov, 23 2019 @ 01:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
The future of our species is getting off this rock.


At least getting all of the idiots off the planet would be a good start, they can find another world to destroy. Leave this one here for the rest of us with common sense and it'll be just fine.



posted on Nov, 23 2019 @ 02:20 PM
link   
a reply to: CrazeeWorld777

Yea, what get's me is that they totally disregard science completely. They are still using the same data and report from the 60's and then the fabled al gore false data for the whole climate change scenario. They have said we have 12 years to live since the 60's and then al gore said it again... uh, it been way more than 12 years lol...

They fail to speak about the 3 EU satellites up there studying climate change, not to mention our's and others. The data all says the same thing. It is a natural cycle that we have been through before and is due to the magnetic poles shifting. As the poles shift so does our shield. Think about the magnets and shavings experiment you did in school as a kid. That is our shield and when the poles shift the shield shifts and at certain times it does allow more radiation into the atmosphere... but it is a natural cycle that we have been through before and has zero to do with man, zip, none... it is warmer some places and colder others lol...

Fact is there is zero we can do to change this.... as this pressure also builds around the earth more earthquakes and volcano's will happen as well. And dems want to kill your cow's and stop you from flying lol... guess what, one volcano puts more into the atmosphere in one explosion than all the cow's and car's, and plane's, in a whole year, a year lol...

Climate change nuts don't have a clue first and have an agenda second, what, they want to control you... plastic is another famous one... is there problem yea, why, well you ship all your garbage to china and they just dump it in the ocean lol... now here is the thing, is there not one of you here that does not understand that we could make a plastic that would degrade completely in five years, or ten, or however long we want... lol... of course we can lol....

One last example... man, is like ant, we occupy less than 2 percent of the land mass, not even talking about oceans... now think about fukishima.. still dumping tons of radiation into the Pacific even today, what, ten years later... if man could alter the earth the Pacific would be dead, it is not, nor is the gulf here where I live from oil spill, it thrives...

As for the princey, well everyone knows they are all pervert's and pedophiles and have been throughout history... even marrying family lol... seriously they would say anything to throw attention elsewhere lol...



posted on Nov, 23 2019 @ 02:25 PM
link   
a reply to: dlbott




That is our shield and when the poles shift the shield shifts and at certain times it does allow more radiation into the atmosphere.

Small point. That "shield" you speak of has no effect on electromagnetic radiation, which is the type of radiation which warms the planet.

On the other hand, the "shield" of greenhouse gasses does prevent electromagnetic radiation from leaving.


guess what, one volcano puts more into the atmosphere in one explosion than all the cow's and car's, and plane's, in a whole year, a year lol...
This is not correct.
www.intelligentliving.co...

edit on 11/23/2019 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 23 2019 @ 02:31 PM
link   
The climate change hoax is used to scare people towards things they'd normally be against like higher taxes, more government, less freedoms.

If it was just something government could actually "do", then they'd "do it".

It's all about and always has been about the accumulation of power.



posted on Nov, 23 2019 @ 02:32 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy




If it was just something government could actually "do", then they'd "do it".

Right. Oh wait, there's those energy company lobbyists and stuff.



posted on Nov, 23 2019 @ 02:41 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

That’s your excuse for the fear-mongers?



posted on Nov, 23 2019 @ 02:52 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

No excuses. I don't tend to pay much attention. I pay more attention to the science.



posted on Nov, 23 2019 @ 02:56 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Ahhh yes, the science.



You call it science, I call it engineered fear mongering.



posted on Nov, 23 2019 @ 02:58 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

Of course you would.

Do you think one volcano produces more CO2 than a year of fossil fuel combustion?
edit on 11/23/2019 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 23 2019 @ 03:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: DBCowboy

Of course you would.

Do you think one volcano produces more CO2 than a year of fossil fuel combustion?


Don't know.

Do you know of any study that takes into account the variances of measuring equipment and calibration methods?



posted on Nov, 23 2019 @ 03:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: DBCowboy

No excuses. I don't tend to pay much attention. I pay more attention to the science.


DO YOU NOW?



The scientific method is an empirical method of acquiring knowledge that has characterized the development of science since at least the 17th century. It involves careful observation, applying rigorous skepticism about what is observed, given that cognitive assumptions can distort how one interprets the observation. It involves formulating hypotheses, via induction, based on such observations; experimental and measurement-based testing of deductions drawn from the hypotheses; and refinement (or elimination) of the hypotheses based on the experimental findings. These are principles of the scientific method, as distinguished from a definitive series of steps applicable to all scientific enterprises.


The Science is NEVER settled.



posted on Nov, 23 2019 @ 03:21 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96




DO YOU NOW?

Yes, I do.



posted on Nov, 23 2019 @ 03:22 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy




Do you know of any study that takes into account the variances of measuring equipment and calibration methods?

All of them, pretty much. You were not aware of this?

Thus the "manipulation" of data which is so often discussed. The variations and instrumental biases are allowed for.

edit on 11/23/2019 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 23 2019 @ 03:26 PM
link   
PedoPrince?



posted on Nov, 23 2019 @ 03:30 PM
link   
a reply to: ArMaP

Truth?

The truth is these crusty old bloodlines think they have the right to treat us as serfs. Like fleas that are an irritating parasite on their Earth.


I can see why you might relate to them through your posting.
edit on 23112019 by Wide-Eyes because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
14
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join