It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Marines (Reserves) Ordered To Active Duty ISO Defense Support Of Civil Authorities

page: 3
14
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 7 2019 @ 02:46 PM
link   
a reply to: Zaphod58

No, but the anonymous yet very trusted source says so, so it’s obviously true.




posted on Oct, 7 2019 @ 03:07 PM
link   
Military Documents Reveal Trumps Preparing For Something Bad To Happen In The US…


This report by Lisa Haven does a side by side comparison of the old and new orders. New additions include:

  • Working with local authorities
  • DOD chain of control to POTUS
  • 72 hour response time



posted on Oct, 7 2019 @ 03:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: Shamrock6

originally posted by: ElectricUniverse

originally posted by: watchitburn
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

It's for the border mission.

We've had active duty units supporting the border patrol all year. Rather than continue to disrupt Active Component deployment and training cycles, it just makes sense to utilize the reserves going forward.


Could be, or could be for something else.

Read the bottom.


...
5.T. Additional contingency-specific manpower guidance released when activation is directed will include:
5.T.1. Reporting of personnel tempo instructions.
5.T.2. Crisis event code, Unique Identifier.
5.T.3. Contingency MCC and RUC if applicable.
6. This message is applicable to the Marine Corps Total Force.
7. Release authorized by Brigadier General Daniel L. Shipley, Director, Manpower Plans and Policy.//



Marine Corps Total Force is for pay and personnel records. Why you find that alarming is beyond baffling.

This MARADMIN cancels a previous MARADMIN pertaining to how reserves can be requested to assist civilian authorities. This notice mobilizes exactly zero Marines.

Maybe do an ounce of research before posting alarmist threads.


This is good to hear.

My friend took her money out of the bank filled her gas tank, and called me crying because some you tube celebrity had her scared to death.



posted on Oct, 7 2019 @ 04:04 PM
link   
a reply to: kwakakev

All of which is pretty standard. I realize people have trouble with this, but every few years the military updates their ops plans and tech orders. That means clarifying and adding things to them. That's all this is, no matter how desperately people want it to be more.
edit on 10/7/2019 by Zaphod58 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 7 2019 @ 04:17 PM
link   
Why would he need a army to fight off Politicians anyways it would have to be a armed coup for that.
edit on 10/7/2019 by Gargoyle91 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 7 2019 @ 04:31 PM
link   
a reply to: Zaphod58

Well hey, if you can’t trust infowars using Natural News for sources, who can ya trust?



posted on Oct, 7 2019 @ 05:21 PM
link   
The country is on edge right now. From what I'm seeing the MSM is acting as cover for a coup. However, I think it's best for everyone to remain calm and keep their heads on a swivel. If things did go south, expect no favors from the MSM. Remember, during a coup most civilians will ignore or be completely oblivious. Like most of us said here, I hope we are wrong, but I'm keeping my ear to the ground.



posted on Oct, 8 2019 @ 10:48 AM
link   
Before y'all start marching off in your SHTF wildest hopes and dreams you might want to brush up on your civics.

Posse Comitatus Act and Insurrection Act indicate a state's National Guard have to tap out and there is a Governor asking for assistance before the POTUS can go all devil dogs domestically. Without a Governor asking for help the POTUS would be making an unlawful order if he deployed.

It's for the best, really.

It's not a coup if a co-equal branch of government is exercising it's constitutional authority.

There are a number of paranoid blogs that are screaming fire in a crowded theater right now.



posted on Oct, 8 2019 @ 10:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: Shamrock6
...
The OP is flat out wrong and two minutes on google would’ve shown as much.


Seriously, sometimes I have to question the reading comprehension of some members.
I was enlisted in the Navy so was never an officer, and never got orders in written form. However, I understand English for the most part.

It could be an error but the new order states:


...
MARINES ORDERED TO ACTIVE DUTY ISO DEFENSE SUPPORT OF CIVIL AUTHORITIES
...


Marines "ORDERED to ACTIVE DUTY ISO DEFENSE SUPPORT OF CIVIL AUTHORITIES" "Ordered to active duty" is in past tense, as in already done, and this is an order to active duty and to stay in stand by.

Meanwhile the old order was:


...MARINES ISO DEFENSE SUPPORT OF CIVIL AUTHORITIES (DSCA)
...


In the old order it seems that the RC were not put in active duty.

I posted this from a military forum in which some of us asked Marine officers what this means. A couple said the same thing that Zaphod58 said, and then one of them said he wasn't entirely sure. Another pointed out what I am pointing here.

The past order this one is replacing did not put in active duty our reserves. This one does.

As an analogy, to me what some of you are claiming is similar to claiming that Defcon 1 and Defcon 2 are the same thing when they are not.

I didn't write anything about "Marines are ready to shoot" or anything like that. If other former military personnel, including officers, aren't entirely sure whether or not this is an active duty call for the higher ups to have our reserves ready for "ISO DEFENSE SUPPORT OF CIVIL AUTHORITIES," at a time in which democrats/socialists are becoming more and more unhinged, and democrats/socialists in power are trying to rile up their zombies in large numbers to illegally trying to depose POTUS Trump and VP Pence, this makes perfect sense to me.

But like I wrote earlier, I could be wrong, and hope that I am.




edit on 8-10-2019 by ElectricUniverse because: correct comment.



posted on Oct, 8 2019 @ 11:09 PM
link   
a reply to: ElectricUniverse




I was enlisted in the Navy so was never an officer, and never got orders in written form. However, I understand English for the most part.


Oooh. Yeesh, I don't know how you swabbies do it, but I have written orders that trace my entire enlisted Army experience. Um, "from stem to stern." I think that's a nautical term. You HAD to have written orders. Question is did you read them?



posted on Oct, 8 2019 @ 11:25 PM
link   
a reply to: Zelun

I got orders by word of mouth from officers and then a briefing between officers and enlisted Aircrew AWO personnel. I do have a flight record in written form with my flight hours and other info.



posted on Oct, 9 2019 @ 06:29 AM
link   
Ya know what, never mind. You want to read this as some sort of sign that a bunch of reservists are hiding in DC, go for it.
edit on 9-10-2019 by Shamrock6 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 10 2019 @ 01:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: Shamrock6
Ya know what, never mind. You want to read this as some sort of sign that a bunch of reservists are hiding in DC, go for it.


What the heck are you talking about?... I keep seeing a whole bunch of "Schiff wannabes" implying things I never even wrote.

I don't think "there are a bunch of reservists hiding in DC..." I don't think "these are orders to shoot..." Or any of the other BS some of you keep claiming I have written, which I didn't...

It could just be coincidence that this order was changed at a time when democrats/socialists are trying to rile up their base to even resort to violence to unseat the POTUS, but maybe it isn't.


edit on 10-10-2019 by ElectricUniverse because: correct comment.



posted on Oct, 10 2019 @ 03:41 AM
link   
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

So you enlisted in the Navy, and then just took it on faith, with the encouragement of the words of the officers appointed over you, that you were fulfilling your duties. At this point I can only assume we're not talking about the US Navy, because you would have been given individual orders directing you to basic training, to advanced individual training, then to your duty assignment aboard a given ship, then maybe other ship, then another, then eventually orders separating you from duty.

Orders are legal documents. If you served in the Navy of your home country, without receiving written orders, well, I hate to say it: You got taken for a ride. I don't mean to diminish your military experience. Not at all. I only mean to assert my own experience as an enlisted soldier, having received official orders and having acted upon them, and that if whatever country you're from doesn't issue written orders to enlisted members of its military really need to start to doing that. It's important.



posted on Oct, 10 2019 @ 06:15 AM
link   
a reply to: Zelun

Granted I was in the men’s department of the Navy, but that’s how it worked for us too.



posted on Oct, 10 2019 @ 06:17 AM
link   
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

You said an order for activation was signed on October 3rd. It’s well past 72 hours. All those activated on the 3rd have to be somewhere.

Sorry for lumping your uninformed and confused nonsense in with the rest of the uninformed and confused nonsense.



posted on Oct, 10 2019 @ 08:44 PM
link   
a reply to: Zelun

For crying out loud... 99% of orders are/were given to me by word of mouth from officers and briefings... Of course when I was transferred the orders were in written form, but not on this format presented in the op. Only other time we had written orders was if we were on leave and were recalled, but that was rare. What else do you want, you want me to also give classified information so I can get in trouble?...

And btw everything was recorded on paper of course...and yes even I had to respectfully request leave in writing...

Not to mention the fact that the majority of the RC these orders are for already have a rating,( MOS for the Marines) and have been assigned to their posts. So all these mentions about "but you had to have received orders in writing for basic training, etc", doesn't really apply to the orders this thread is about.





edit on 10-10-2019 by ElectricUniverse because: add comment.



posted on Oct, 10 2019 @ 08:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: Shamrock6
...
Sorry for lumping your uninformed and confused nonsense in with the rest of the uninformed and confused nonsense.


You know what Shamrock? You can stick it where the sun don't shine. Or maybe it is a stick you need to pull out...




edit on 10-10-2019 by ElectricUniverse because: add comment.



posted on Oct, 10 2019 @ 09:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: Zelun

Granted I was in the men’s department of the Navy, but that’s how it worked for us too.


Hang on. Are we talking about the Old Navy?



posted on Oct, 10 2019 @ 09:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
a reply to: Zelun

For crying out loud... 99% of orders are/were given to me by word of mouth from officers and briefings... Of course when I was transferred the orders were in written form, but not on this format presented in the op. Only other time we had written orders was if we were on leave and were recalled, but that was rare. What else do you want, you want me to also give classified information so I can get in trouble?...

And btw everything was recorded on paper of course...and yes even I had to respectfully request leave in writing...



I think there's something weird about me. I don't think I ever took leave unless prompted by a superior. When I was retired I had a full two months of accrued leave that I had to use before I could be separated. I had medical appointments during that two months, but I went in shorts, t-shirt and sandals. That Texas sun, though. Too hot for uniform.



new topics

top topics



 
14
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join