The Trump Administration Asked The Supreme Court To Legalize Firing Workers Simply For Being Gay

a reply to: Sillyolme

your response is the definition of paranoia

I've had tons of homophobic bosses but they all have the same thing in common. They keep wanting me to suck up to or off them, an try to screw me, and dont want to spend a cent.

How am I supposed to get home, if they giving me the cab fare. They just toss me out like some dumpster of sorts when they had their fill.

a reply to: M5xaz

Wasn't a Canadian man facing two years of prison for the "hate crime" of passing out safe sex pamphlets at a gay pride parade too?

originally posted by: Sillyolme

Gays keep pushing the goalposts and do not want mere equality but DOMINATION

a reply to: M5xaz

This statement is the very definition of homophobia.

What's equal about marching naked in the streets and not getting arrested for indecent exposure?

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: M5xaz
What rights exactly do trannys get that non trannys dont?

How about using the government as an attack dog over speech.

a reply to: Dr UAE

You can call me sweetheart if it makes you feel any better. x

I simply presented the article, other links to other News articles that support it, plus my opinion.

But yeh your correct is all my fault and I'm insane because we disagree.

I don't really think its my sanity that should be called in to question but possibly your own.

Good Christ is LORD, I just can't take it. Ughhh.

Sometimes the gullibility, stupidity, and hypocrisy on some of these boards just frosts my damn cookies...

What was once a meeting place for those with a knack for logic and reason...not to mention the common sense needed to navigate the world without looking like fools or giving people like me a headache...is now quite often on par with your run-of-the-mill DailyMail or YouTube comment section.

I swear, is the Millennial Generation the first generation in which its members haven't a clue whereabouts, more or less, each finds himself on the smarts spectrum?!? A Boomer or a Generation X-Man at least had an idea of where he stood but nowadays, everyone knows what's up, everyone knows about every last subject on Earth, everyone knows enough about every subject and thus is comfortable drawing a pretty hefty conclusion or forming an opinion and permanently tacking it up online. Of course though, nobody ever has the decency to take ownership of an opinion and kindly put a foot in the mouth once a third website or something brings about a revelation and change of opinion.

And as a more-or-less related side note, people...reading something on a website is not research, knowledge or familiarity with an issue.

And even more true than that, waiting to cross-reference a second website before deeming information verified is not prudence.

Prudence, in fact, is keeping your mouth shut sometimes and deciding maybe you just haven't the expert command of the situation at hand which really should be required to be taken seriously. At least you could come to this conclusion from time to time before you make a judgement or public statement so as not to look like a misguided misinformed mammering mumble-news.

originally posted by: LSU2018

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: drewlander

Well, they may wish to make some money, that could be a reason for one.

Not everyone enjoys the luxury of working for people they like.

It helps all the same.

I can't understand why any employers would care as to a person's sexual preference in this day of age.

Can you understand why they would care about a person's political interests? I bet you can.

Nice jab. Now that i spent some time thinking about it, this topic i think it boils down to fringe benefits where its not a political issue. I would dread tanking my business over the cost of a sexual deviants crotch-ectomy. And it wouldnt stop there. How would i explain to my clients that i had to close shop? The dick jokes would never end and it would be an embarassing way to bury my lifes work and legacy.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: M5xaz

What election fraud did Hillary engage in?

You really need to backup these statements you're making.

A proclaimation from you, even from a knight, needs backup.

Because Hillary did not engage in election fraud EVER....

You are just stating opinion and you know what they say about those...

You hardly ever do yourself. And when presented with such, you're hardly ever to be found again. So lie in this bed.

originally posted by: Barcs

originally posted by: M5xaz
Sorry buddy, but you asked for it - gays are going over the line, this is pushback.

How are they going over the line???

Talking about Canada is a red herring. Trump is proposing this for AMERICA.

This less than 5% of the population wants CONTROL of the MAJORITY.
NO. Enough !

LOL! How exactly are they CONTROLLING anybody?

Majority Rule. NOW !
If majority rule is good for South Africa it is also good for everywhere in the West.

Really stupid statement. Keep spreading your bigotry.

READ MY POSTS !

ASKING FOR EQUALITY IS BIGOTRY ???
You prove my point.

What the LGBT pushes for in Canada they also want in the US is NOT equality but special treatment and demand for dominance/revenge over heterosexuals.
NOT GONNA HAPPEN

Equality ONLY

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: M5xaz
What rights exactly do trannys get that non trannys dont?

READ MY POSTS AGAIN, slower.

In Canada, if you insult a heterosexual by using the wrong pronoun to address him/her, best that person can do is sue you in civil court for slander.

If however you insult a tranny using the wrong pronoun to address it, you can get charged criminally and do JAIL TIME. Heterosexuals have no similar rights.

This is NOT equality but dominance, the true objective of LGBTs

QED

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: M5xaz

What election fraud did Hillary engage in?

You really need to backup these statements you're making.

A proclaimation from you, even from a knight, needs backup.

Because Hillary did not engage in election fraud EVER....

You are just stating opinion and you know what they say about those...

NO. I AM STATING FACT:
www.thedailybeast.com...
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) on Thursday backed former Democratic National Committee chief Donna Brazile’s assessment that the 2016 Democratic primary was “rigged” in favor of Hillary Clinton and against Bernie Sanders.

www.thedailybeast.com...
Former interim Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Donna Brazile claims Hillary Clinton secretly took over the DNC before she had won the Democratic primary. In an excerpt from her new book published by Politico, Brazile said she promised Clinton’s opponent, Bernie Sanders, that she would get to the bottom of whether Clinton had “rigged the nomination process.” She wrote, “By September 7, the day I called Bernie, I had found my proof and it broke my heart.” Brazile describes a fundraising agreement between the Hillary Victory Fund, Hillary for America, and the DNC that stipulated that Hillary would control the “party’s finances, strategy, and all the money raised” in exchange for Clinton raising money and investing in the DNC. It was signed long before Clinton became the nominee.

Hillary Clinton's rallies were always a few hundred to a few thousands - nobody showed up. Rigging the primary per above PROOF is the only way she could become the nominee

Hillary Clinton is grossly incompetent ( as shown during her SoS stint), unable to handle classified information, corrupt ( Clinton Foundation) and a keel over drunk ( as when she passed out drunk at the 911 memorial ). And Hillary enabled her PEDO husband.

Thank God that loser is not President.
Looking for a female role model ? Think Margaret Thatcher, not drunkard "I like my Chardonnay" Clinton.

originally posted by: Wardaddy454
a reply to: M5xaz

Wasn't a Canadian man facing two years of prison for the "hate crime" of passing out safe sex pamphlets at a gay pride parade too?

EXACTLY !!
ENOUGH !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: M5xaz

You seem to think in circles with a hatred of Hillery Clinton at the center of your being. Give it up man, she is never going to threaten you again except apparently in your dreams. Meanwhile, in your hatred for her you have allowed a total nincompoop and a fraud into the White House who in his incompetence is bringing about the very fears of all REAL conservative hopes

Majority rule??? Bosh. The rule you have allowed to happen is the rule of a few who control the emerging alternative hate media and you have drunk it like cool aid. CNN? Who cares about CNN, not me, not many others on this site. But this network of ''truth'' that many here subscribe to as truth and continue to bring to this site as proof of your erratic belief system is rotting your brains.

Sure, listening to the msm with little to no discernment is childish but to toss them all and turn to this ''underground'' network of idiotic propaganda that is backed up by your nincompoop is madness. SNIP

You are the one who raised the issue of 2016 and Hillary, cupcake, not me. You support a candidate that rigs elections. Most people don't.

With respect to drinking the Kool aid, check a mirror. Socialism always ends in failure and mass homicide. You have learned nothing from the millions freed by the fall of the Berlin wall or the millions still suffering under socialism, be it Cuba , Venezuela, etc. You swallow the BS without any intellectual analysis of the history of the Left.

Unless on purpose you want mass famine, starvation, hardship and homicide.

Maybe you share goals with Stalin or Pol Pot
Most people don't...

originally posted by: underwerks
...
Some of y'all have never bought anything illegal and it's showing.

What the heck? So, you are stating that you have bought illegal things, but I wonder what does that have to do with this thread... However, it does show that indeed liberals/democrats like yourself are in fact criminals, buying something illegal makes you a criminal, and instead of wanting to punish criminals people like you want to instead punish law abiding citizens... No wonder the people you vote for all favor CRIMINALITY...

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

I'll take underwerks for 1000 Alex................

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: SailorJerry

If you don't like buzzfeed i have posted some other links, but it appears to be legit, as unfortunate as the case may be.

The problem is, the left-wing sources are all making claims that are false.

Notice first of all that the title of the article you gave states "The Trump Administration Asked The Supreme Court To Legalize Firing Workers Simply For Being Gay"

But if you read down below this is what they wrote...:

Friday’s brief comes after the administration argued that federal law allows firing workers simply for being transgender.
....

There is a big difference between being gay/lesbian and being "transgender," but the article is trying to claim they are the same thing and hence they are trying to make gay/lesbians think that the Trump administration is targeting them when this is FALSE.

So the article started off falsely claiming that the administration wants to fire gay people, when the problem is "transgenders" and the forceful laws that have been implemented all around the country in which people must not only accept the views of transgenders, but people have to accept even biological men, who look NOTHING like a woman and still have their male parts, inside women's restrooms... Same thing with women whom claim to be male. The administration is not wanting to fire gay people, but your article lies and you are accepting these lies...

And of course, left-wingers like yourself can't even understand that with the "bathroom laws" employers would have to allow men in women's restrooms in the workplace, when it has been shown multiple times that these laws are allowing perverts whom claim to be women in women's/girl's restrooms and locker rooms, or women whom claim to be male being allowed in men's/boys restrooms and locker rooms...

These bathroom laws also open employers to more lawsuits since men or women can enter the bathrooms of the opposite sex and perverts, including peeping toms are using these laws to satisfy their perversions.

I have said it from the start. Perhaps it is time to make a new bathroom just for transgenders. It will solve all problems, even though it would be more expensive, but at the same time it would not force girls, women, boys, men to have to share their bathrooms/restrooms with the opposite sex.

originally posted by: SailorJerry
Buzzfeed


NEXT!!!!!!!

Just having buzzfeed as a source is enough to get this thread thrown in the LOL or Hoax bin

Literally nothing in that article was factual

What's more, if a "conservative" or "independent" source was lying like they are lying in the article that thread would have IMMEDIATELY been thrown into the LOL or hoax bin.

These left-wing articles are trying to claim the Trump administration want to fire gay/lesbians when the problem is the transgenders and the problems with the bathroom laws.

Not to mention the fact that a man can even claim "to feel like a woman inside" and as thus be considered as a woman. What if let's say a job decides to hire all transgender men whom claim to be women and as thus it fills the requirements of having people of both sexes in those jobs. A woman, or women whom applied to that same job can start a lawsuit stating they were denied a job for being a real woman/women. If it hasn't happened already, it will happen.

The left still seems unable to understand the can of worms you all opened with these "bathroom laws."

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

" I have said it from the start. Perhaps it is time to make a new bathroom just for transgenders. "


Yes , a Lower Urinal Slash Toilet for those who Cannot Decide . ...Hmm.....

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

" I have said it from the start. Perhaps it is time to make a new bathroom just for transgenders. "


Yes , a Lower Urinal Slash Toilet for those who Cannot Decide . ...Hmm.....

It would eventually have to be a completely separate bathroom. Just a separate urinal won't be enough.

What's more, the original poster and the articles claim that "the Trump administration want to discriminate against gays," when in fact if you read the court document the lawsuit is against "CLAYTON COUNTY,GEORGIA" not against the Trump administration. So, it is not the "Trump administration' that is making the argument, it is the "CLAYTON COUNTY,GEORGIA" which is making the argument...

www.supremecourt.gov...

This thread should be thrown into the hoax bin and if the original poster wants to post it again he should make sure to use articles that are not lying, and he should make sure to write in context what this is about and whom is actually being sued, which is not the Trump administration...

Heck, I have had threads closed down, or thrown in the LOL forum for less than the lies the op and the articles he is presenting are making. I am sure several members have had to do the same thing.