The Trump Administration Asked The Supreme Court To Legalize Firing Workers Simply For Being Gay

a reply to: M5xaz

You are the one who raised the issue of 2016 and Hillary, cupcake, not me. You support a candidate that rigs elections. Most people don't.

You sound like an idiot. You keep repeating yourself when you insist that I support Clinton. I have told you that I do not and had you read any of my other posts where she or Slick Willy were discussed you could have seen that.

Cupcake. Oh yeah, an old pejorative denoting inferiority Oh my how you find these old hacks, you really are wonderful.

Socialism? Man oh man, your brain is stuck in a very deep rut.

a reply to: andy06shake

You are the original poster and it seems that you didn't even read the court document. The article lies, first of all it is not the Trump administration making the argument... The court document states in specific

GERALD LYNN BOSTOCK,PETITIONER v. CLAYTON COUNTY,GEORGIA ALTITUDE EXPRESS,INC.,ET AL.,PETITIONERS v. MELISSA ZARDA,AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF DONALD ZARDA,ET AL

www.supremecourt.gov...

So you, and the articles you have posted are all lying... The Trump administration are not even the ones making the arguments...

Sex = Male or Female.

Can't discriminate between the two biological sexes.

What you like to put in your mouth doesn't determine your biological sex.

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

What Did Our Ancient Transgender Ancestors do ? Poop in a Hole in the Ground ? ........Hmm...

How many times do the anti-trump crowd need to have egg on their face?

You believe every article negative on the President, then time and time again be shown to be a gullible fool for believing it.

its true, FAKE NEWS has infected so many

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: M5xaz

You are the one who raised the issue of 2016 and Hillary, cupcake, not me. You support a candidate that rigs elections. Most people don't.

You sound like an idiot. You keep repeating yourself when you insist that I support Clinton. I have told you that I do not and had you read any of my other posts where she or Slick Willy were discussed you could have seen that.

Cupcake. Oh yeah, an old pejorative denoting inferiority Oh my how you find these old hacks, you really are wonderful.

Socialism? Man oh man, your brain is stuck in a very deep rut.

For fact-free discussions, examples of contradicting yourself and stupidity, read your own posts.

a reply to: M5xaz

I think that from now on I will just refer to you as Mr. Nana I know you are but what am I.
Off with you pest, you bore me.

Another fool posting dumbass comments that low life liberals use,majority of people have self esteem and wouldn't post such nonsense,but then again look at source,seems to be the normj on ATSa reply to: andy06shake

originally posted by: M5xaz
a reply to: andy06shake

Sorry buddy, but you asked for it - gays are going over the line, this is pushback.

[...]

Majority Rule. NOW !
If majority rule is good for South Africa it is also good for everywhere in the West.

Pushback??

Do hate crimes also get excused by that reasoning? Just pushback after all. "you asked for it".

Majority Rule without inalienable Minority Rights is not Democracy it is Dictatorship.

Minority rights are fundamental to democracy. If the majority is allowed to disenfranchise the rights of the minority, they seize power indefinitely and democracy fails replaced by tyranny. The majority also enjoys the same protections when they become the minority, and at it's core, we are all minorities as individuals.

....
Individual rights are not subject to a public vote; a majority has no right to vote away the rights of a minority; the political function of rights is precisely to protect minorities from oppression by majorities (and the smallest minority on earth is the individual).

Ayn Rand

a reply to: andy06shake

Hmm...wasn't Trump always "gay-friendly?" If this is true, then it simply reeks of orchestration. In other words, feeding the rift between the two opposing sides "they" have so successfully created.

...if only 95% of the citizenry weren't lemmings.

originally posted by: panoz77
Sex = Male or Female.

Can't discriminate between the two biological sexes.

What you like to put in your mouth doesn't determine your biological sex.

...so you're saying I'm not a steak lover?

This has nothing to do with the current administration but I am sure it will get all the left riled up and ready with pitchforks.

LGBTQR2D2 are NOT a minority. They are not discriminated against. They are not a race. They are a special interest group who does not want equality. No, they want special rights. I feel bad for those who actually transition and do it the right way because they get caught up in this nonsense.

The issue is that the LGBT community wants to change the definition of gender and make it sexual preference or identity. This is not the way the real world works. If you are a man and you transition, you then apply to the courts and you 'legally' become a man or woman. This is LAW.

What we see here are people who are identifying but not completing the process legally. If Frank in Accounting decided one day to wear a dress to work and said "Call me Sally" it has nothing to do with his job. However, it could be a distraction to other workers. Many times they will want to be treated different. Use the other bathroom. No. Legally, you are still a male.

As far as Trump and gay rights, he is the ONLY major party candidate to EVER support gay marriage before or during the election process. Look up who introduced him at the RNC convention before he accepted his nomination. Peter Theil. His administration has passed legislation to PROTECT gay rights at home and abroad.

Do some research and in all honestly read your own article OP and you just might learn something. The MSM has become worse than the bait and switch that sales people read. The headline is the hook and the small print is how it really is.

a reply to: Extorris

Agreed, provided both sides play by the same rules, which is not the case here.
The rights of the majority matter as well.

Having lopsided laws that punish slander against trannys with JAIL , which is NOT the case for insults against heterosexuals is not EQUALITY but domination.

LGBTs asking for domination is causing pushback, not me.

Equality.
Period.
Nothing more.

a reply to: andy06shake
Buzzfeed really. You need some help to believe that propaganda feed. Please. President Trump has far more important issues than LGBT issues.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: funbobby

The terms “because of sex” or “on the basis of sex” include, but are not limited to

Seems to me firing an individual based on sexual preference is covered there. At least, that's what Obama's DOJ asserted, that Title VII already provided protection for the LGBT community.

I work with a lot of coding systems. One of them is FIPS, which is a standard used for census information. While trying to check the FIPS codes and definitions that are used by the united states government, i came across the legal definition used by the census for both sex and gender.

census definition



In general discussions, the concept of “gender” is often confused with the concept of “sex,” and the terms are used interchangeably. These two concepts are not the same:

Sex is based on the biological attributes of men and women (chromosomes, anatomy, hormones).

Gender is a social construction whereby a society or culture assigns certain tendencies or behaviors the labels of masculine or feminine.



Your reference says "sex". By the governments own standard, sex specifically means the biological anatomy, chromosomes and hormones as they relate to men and women. Nowhere does the legal definition state anything about how one chooses to pleasure themself or others.

Sorry. Your argument has no ground to stand on.

I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION SAID ANYTHING LIKE THAT OR EVEN CLOSE. NO ONE SHOULD BE FIRED OR PREVENTED FROM EARNING A LIVING BECAUSE THEY ARE GAY OR LESBIAN OR ANYTHING ELSE.

If you're gay and someone wants to fire you for it, how would they prove they are right? I've known lots of people who I thought were gay at first but weren't and also the exact opposite. This is nothing more than legalizing discrimination. Besides people are fired for being gay already. They just don't don't say that's why they're doing it.. This just allows people to be aholes about it openly.

a reply to: mOjOm

We are 10 pages in. You should read the thread next time. The headline is fake news and lies, it isn't happening.

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Just the part about Trump was wrong I thought. There is still the case going to the supreme Court, right?