Ohio shooting, first reports: At least 7 people killed

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: ViXxeN

Guns don't kill people,

Correct. It's a piece of lead traveling at 1,200 fps that does so.

Triggered by human hands, hopefully. (as apposed to run away monkeys)

a reply to: ViXxeN

Intentionally and otherwise.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: ViXxeN

Intentionally and otherwise.

And many times in self defence.

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: xuenchen

What? I never discuss without you because of stupid comments like that.

Hollywood, the gaming industry, a militarised society, cult around the most selfish, ignorant pricks one can find ... those things don't come from the middle east.
Wtf?

As opposed to ritual killings due to one's religion ?
They dont need video games , a militarized society . It is part of their culture and history.
As stated , the Middle East "takes the cake"
Done
Next

a reply to: ViXxeN

Sometimes in self defense.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Grimpachi

Yup, society has changed.
Now what?

How about more schools that are not overcrowded. The states taking an active interest in guiding the youth toward something constructive maybe more apprentice programs being subsidized. There are a lot of things that can be done to bring down the tension and unite people that don't require making a scapegoat.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: burdman30ott6

Heh. Good one.

You think that pointing out division is decisive.

I think being a condescending feeb who waltzes into a discussion precipitated by the murderous actions of a crazy asshole with some internet flex of "teh gunz" is divisive. What you excuse as "pointing out division" I calcall acting a fool... comse comsa, you know?

a reply to: Grimpachi

I don't know if there's really just one thing like tv or schools that need adjustment and it goes away. Self worth and self acceptance seems to be a big issue the mentality of "I show you all how powerful I am / who is laughing now" could be part of it, but not the only thing.
It's such a complex issue and just shooting those who do these kind of horrible acts won't get us any closer to figuring out what leads to it.
I mean it could all start with being neglected as baby and not developing enough empathy as a result of that.
But what could you really do about it without a serious violation of privacy from families?

a reply to: Grimpachi

There are a lot of things that can be done to bring down the tension and unite people that don't require making a scapegoat.

Where should that start, do you think?

a reply to: burdman30ott6

Do you disagree that gunz make it easy to kill lots of people?

a reply to: Gothmog

Okay now that you've declared it "done" what has been accomplished?

a reply to: Phage

Legal gun holders using their amendment rights for Self defence against illegal gun holders and crazy people, is a beautiful thing. Don't you think.

a reply to: ViXxeN

Yeah. Sure.
Beautiful. Tell that to those in Dayton.

originally posted by: sunkuong
a reply to: carewemust

chemical castration isn't 100% effective.

But so far it is promising compared to "shoot them all let God sort them out"

Lobotomies 🎯

a reply to: Phage


My point was the true value of human life versus liberal goals . Meaning the second amendment and the wall .

Human life is cherished when the left preaches about the Second Amendment .

Human tragedy is ignored when they condemn the wall .

Then to avoid actual discussion they say stuff like this .

That's why people put water out in the desert. Stupid bleeding heart libs!

Yep we put water out we even install spickets for them to drink from.

Still on average 400 still die year with the border patrol rescuing about 3000 per year .


So my question to you is.

Are you only concern with human lives when it matches your agenda ?

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: ViXxeN

Yeah. Sure.
Beautiful. Tell that to those in Dayton.

We can't save everyone, but we can save a large majority, with guns. It goes both ways. Illegal gun holders don't obey the law, legal gun owners do.

The MSM media rarely talks about people who've been saved because of a responsible gun owner, usually its all about the bad. Poor journalism when they only give half the story.

a reply to: xuenchen

You people are a freakshow. Gun restriction: my rights! My freedom!
But lobotomy and chemical restriction is fine? Is that supposed to be funny?

originally posted by: muzzleflash
a reply to: Peeple

Finally yall are starting to understand what I was posting threads about years ago.

Maybe I can start posting threads questioning the entire concept of 'mental illness' now? Back then, just a few years ago, those threads got shut down and people got so unbelievably angry with me because I dared to question their beliefs in mental illness.

Oh I know I know, not you, you always understood and agreed - I mean the rest of them. *They* are finally starting to understand. I know you personally always did.

An example of what I'm referring to

Hi I had a quick look at the link you provided regarding mental illness being a myth. Unfortunately it was tldr as I don't have time atm but will later.

Could you quickly summarise what is actually wrong with people who are permanent residents in psychiatric hospitals, if they're not mentally ill that is. Thanks

a reply to: Fallingdown

Are you only concern with human lives when it matches your agenda ?

Still off topic. But, no.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Grimpachi

There are a lot of things that can be done to bring down the tension and unite people that don't require making a scapegoat.

Where should that start, do you think?

That's the thing right. It needs to start somewhere but right now people are so wrapped up in the symptom "guns" they won't even consider addressing the cause.

Take away the guns and it continues then what? Take away their knives, cars, axes, and anything someone can be used to harm others?