Trying to resolve 9/11

a reply to: neutronflux

Why was the collapse of building 7 reported before it collapsed?

originally posted by: neutronflux

originally posted by: kwakakev
a reply to: neutronflux

I am basing my arguments with what I see and know of this world, we all are. We have all just been left in the dark to figure it all out for ourselves, of course we look foolish.

Why not actually cite sources. Because they are debunked?

My eyes are the source and my eye sight has not been debunked!!

It is good to see how much struggle and fight is going on with this thread. It does show some will still remains in trying to resolve 9/11. But how do we get there? Is then even a there to get to?

Do we curl up at night and tell our selfs it don't exist? Do we grab our pitch forks and get shot down? Do we just wake up in the morning and get on with our lives just knowing the fox is in the chicken coop?

originally posted by: Itisnowagain

originally posted by: neutronflux

originally posted by: kwakakev
a reply to: neutronflux

I am basing my arguments with what I see and know of this world, we all are. We have all just been left in the dark to figure it all out for ourselves, of course we look foolish.

Why not actually cite sources. Because they are debunked?

My eyes are the source and my eye sight has not been debunked!!

Then post the video of columns being actively cut.

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: neutronflux

Why was the collapse of building 7 reported before it collapsed?

Over confusion from reports WTC was cleared out out of fear it would collapse. Now provide evidence of cut columns.

a reply to: kwakakev

No. Lies of the truth movement are being exposed. As they have been repeatedly for the last 17 plus years.

a reply to: neutronflux

Yes they have, along with the lies of the official story. We are not left with much. What is left sucks bad.

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: neutronflux

Why was the collapse of building 7 reported before it collapsed?

Why does it matter?

a reply to: mrthumpy

Does anything matter?

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: mrthumpy

Does anything matter?

You brought it up. I thought it must be significant to you in some way

a reply to: neutronflux

I don't have to...... I saw the 3 collapsing buildings.

a reply to: mrthumpy

Maybe it is the thread that did it!!
It is significant to the thread.

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: mrthumpy

Maybe it is the thread that did it!!

Just trolling then. OK, you carry on

a reply to: mrthumpy

So I am trolling??
Then what are you?

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: mrthumpy

So I am trolling??
Then what are you?

Looks like it

I was just asking why you brought it up. The Truth movement attaches major significance to it but none of them seem to know why

a reply to: mrthumpy

Well if you fail to see the significance then I feel sad for you.

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: mrthumpy

Well if you fail to see the significance then I feel sad for you.

So help me out then. What's the big deal about it?

a reply to: mrthumpy

What would be the point?
It seems that you believe the official story.

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: mrthumpy

What would be the point?
It seems that you believe the official story.

So you're another one with no idea. Colour me surprised

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: neutronflux

I don't have to...... I saw the 3 collapsing buildings.

And I researched that WTC 1, 2, and 7 had reported structure failures before collapse. WTC 1 and 2 started to lean before collapse. WTC 7 had a wall bulging before collapse.
And I saw WTC 1 and 2 collapse from fire related causes. With inward bowing and buckling on video. And I saw where WTC 7 was damaged by the collapse of the towers, and fire related issues. With zero evidence of Controlled Demolition. Especially in that the towers’ vertical columns fell last proving Gage used a falsehood.