It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Boeing commercial airplanes can, in fact, be flown remotely through the use of independent embedded software and satellite communication. By engaging this system, it prevents pilots or hijacker from flying the plane, and instead uses digital signals that communicate with air traffic control through satellite links for the rest of the flight.
This technology is known as the Boeing Honeywell Uninterruptible Autopilot System, and the mere existence of this technology creates a new possible answer for a few of the most prominent airline disasters, including 9/ 11 and the Malaysia MH370 mystery.
In the event of a hijacking, the control of the airplane could be taken away from those in the cockpit, be it an actual pilot with a gun to the back of his head, an inexperienced Muslim with 40 hours of flight time in a Cessna, or an experienced pilot just minding his own business and flying a commercial airline.
“The ‘uninterruptible’ autopilot would be activated–either by pilots, by onboard sensors, or even remotely via radio or satellite links by government agencies like the Central Intelligence Agency, if terrorists attempt to gain control of a flight deck.”–John Croft, Flight Global.
The unique feature of the uninterruptible autopilot is that it has its own power supply, so if someone thinks they can shut it down by cutting the power, they would be in for a very big surprise. This feature was by no means accidental, and the separate power supply allows for the automatic landing function.
“To make it fully independent, the system has its own power supply, independent of the aircraft’s circuit breakers. The aircraft remains in automatic mode until after landing, when mechanics or government security operatives are called in to disengage the system.”–John Croft, Flight Global.
There wouldn’t need to be any terrorists onboard an aircraft to make it look like there actually was. All the controller would need to do is engage the autopilot and fly the plane themselves. The pilots would instantly be turned into passengers.
Is this how the planes on 9/ 11 were flown into the World Trade Center towers at such a low altitude at such a high speed? Most pilots with experience with these airplanes that are interviewed about this topic seem to question how the planes could even be flown so low and so fast.
“I flew the two actual aircraft which were involved in 9/ 11; the Fight number 175 and Flight 93, the 757 that allegedly went down in Shanksville and Flight 175 is the aircraft that’s alleged to have hit the South Tower. I don’t believe it’s possible for, like I said, for a terrorist, a so-called terrorist to train on a [Cessna] 172, then jump in a cockpit of a 757-767 class cockpit, and vertical navigate the aircraft, lateral navigate the aircraft, and fly the airplane at speeds exceeding it's designed limit speed by well over 100 knots, make high-speed high-banked turns, exceeding—pulling probably 5, 6, 7 G’s. And the aircraft would literally fall out of the sky. I couldn’t do it and I’m absolutely positive they couldn’t do it.”–Captain Russ Wittenberg, former U.S. Air Force fighter pilot.
Captain Wittenberg has forgotten more about flying than most pilots even know. With over 100 combat missions under his belt, he later became a commercial pilot and flew for Pan Am and United Airlines for 35 years. Aircraft flown: Boeing 707, 720, 727, 737, 747, 757, 767, and 777. Captain Wittenberg has 30,000 + total hours flown, so he is very experienced when it comes to airplanes.
How many times have we heard the phrase “19 Arab hijackers” when discussing the plot of 9/ 11? Basically every single time the media talks about 9/ 11. They never seem to mention that the names of those 19 Arab hijackers never show up on any of the airline passengers manifests, instead they just show us the grainy image of a well-dressed Mohammed Atta breezing through security with his box cutter, the weapon of choice for hijackers and movers, presumably well hidden up his ass.
So the way the story goes is that there were 19 Arab hijackers that were members of Al-Qaeda, and they overpowered the flight crew and took control of the planes and flew them into the buildings, the Pentagon and into a small hole in a field in Pennsylvania.
There are a few problems with this story that created some understandable confusion. The first problem with the passenger lists that have been released is that the identities of several of the alleged hijackers have changed with no explanation. That shouldn’t happen, and if it did happen, who made those changes, and why?
Another problem with the story, and it is sort of a big one, is that at least 10 of these “hijackers” turned up alive. If these guys were able to take control of an airplane, fly it around for an hour without being shot down, fly them into the World Trade Center, blow up the plane, knock down three buildings with two planes, and then come back to life in Saudi Arabia, it is time to throw David Copperfield’s ass out and get these boys a show in Las Vegas because that is really impressive.
“We know that the 15 hijackers who were Saudis, the alleged hijackers, because they were not on those planes–not one of the 19 hijackers, or any Arabs, were on any of the four planes, according to the passenger list, and according to all of the evidence that would be there if they were on the planes, but has not been produced.
“So these 15 Saudi patsies, who were set up to take the blame for 9/ 11, were, in fact, CIA agents. We know this–I had this confirmed directly by a CIA source that these 15 Saudis entered, and repeatedly reentered on these supposedly–they call them employment visas, but there’s a special number for employment visas that are only given to CIA assets as a reward for their service to the Central Intelligence Agency, and this visa allows them to come to the US. Typically they’re paid for their work for the CIA in Saudi Arabia, and then they are given this special kind of visa which is disguised as an employment visa but it’s of a particular type.
“And all 15 of these guys had that visa. That shows that they were, in fact, Central Intelligence Agency agents. Some of them were living with FBI people in California. So these 15 Saudis were not working against the United States government, they were working for the United States government, and they were set up so that Saudi Arabia could be potentially blamed for the September 11 attacks, which were actually perpetrated by Israel and its American assets.”–Dr. Kevin Barrett, journalist.
"I was real close to Building 7 when it fell down. That didn't sound like just a building falling down to me while I was running away from it. There's a lot of eyewitness testimony down there of hearing explosions. I didn't see any reason for that building to fall down the way it did, and a lot of guys should be saying the same thing. I don't know what the fear is coming out and talking about it? I don't know, but it's the truth."–Craig Bartmer, New York Police Officer.
World Trade Center Building 7 was 610 feet tall, 47 stories. Although it was not hit by an airplane, it completely collapsed into a pile of rubble in less than 7 seconds at 5: 20 p.m. on 9/ 11, seven hours after the collapses of the Twin Towers.
“We originally had thought there was like an internal detonation explosives because it went in succession, boom, boom, boom, boom, and then the tower came down.”–Ed Cachia, New York Firefighter.
WTC7 would be the only steel framed building in history to collapse due to fire. If we are to believe that WTC7 actually did collapse due to fire, then it stands to reason that the procedures for firefighters working on high rise buildings would need to be changed. Also, the engineering standards regarding fire would need to be revamped, and an alternative material would need to be used instead of steel. None of this happened.
Remember the “9/ 11 Commission Report”, or as the rest of the country likes to call it, the “9/ 11 Omission Report”? This pile of flaming dog # didn’t even mention that Building 7 collapsed on September 11th. What, you guys just forgot about a 47-story building that came down at free-fall speed?
Stop for just a moment and think about that. The commission that was basically forced to investigate the largest terrorist attack in American history did not mention that Building 7 collapsed. They just pretended like it never happened. Why? What the hell are they hiding? There is no reasonable explanation for this. It simply doesn’t make any sense at all, if they were conducting an actual investigation, which they obviously were not.
Building Seven has never been a focal point of the media or any remarkable investigation. This report contends that there is plenty of evidence suggesting that Building Seven was a primary target, and a small amount of evidence suggesting Building 4 was a target as well. Building Seven housed government offices of the CIA, SEC, IRS and Secret Service, which held documents for thousands of investigations of financial crime. The center also housed the El Dorado group, an interagency money- laundering group of specialists under the control of the US Customs agency. Never explained fires raged for hours on the floors of those offices, and seismic recording show the same burst of energy prior to the building coming down, as was experienced just prior to the collapse of both Towers 1 and 2. There has never been even a plausible explanation for the deliberate destruction of Building Seven. Building Seven was probably the target for United Airlines Flight 93, delayed at the gate for 40 minutes, and downed in Pennsylvania, before it could reach its unknown target. Just a very few minutes after Flight 93 downed, Building 7 was ordered evacuated by parties unknown today. After everyone had evacuated, the fires started!
The key matter for consideration and inquiry is that, according to John O’Neal, and Sibel Edmonds, the FBI (whose files were in the North Tower) was denied information by the CIA and Secret Service, whose files would have been kept in Building Seven. One has to presume that any files relating to financial investigations of money laundering related to “intelligence” operations and the Russian/Israeli Mafiya around Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Afghanistan were kept in Building Seven or Tower 1. These Towers also held investigative information for the Bank of New money laundering scandal, which will later be shown to be intricately linked to covert oil operations in the aforementioned countries. From another perspective, three of the agencies involved in the Enron investigation were housed in the WTC: SEC, the Justice Department, and the FBI. (With a great deal of certainty this report concludes that Enron was a major money-laundering vehicle for the financial rape of Russia, buying and selling petrochemical contracts from the U.S. subsidiaries of the Russian oligarchs.) Both DoD and HUD had contracts with Enron, and those agencies were reported by Rumsfeld (on September 10, 2001) to be unable to account for some $3.3 trillion in funding. The IRS, in Building 7 was looking at Barrick’s offshore hedge book. What is suggested about the collapse of Building 7 by reports other than FEMA’s report?
The first mention of WTC7 happened in the early evening of 9/ 11 on the London-based BBC news. 4: 57 pm (Eastern Time United States) BBC studio reporter states:
“We'll leave it there for a moment. We've got some news just coming in actually, that the Solomon Brothers' Building in New York, right in the heart of Manhattan, has also collapsed. This does fit in with a warning from the British Foreign Office a couple of hours ago to British Citizens that there is a real risk, ah let me get the exact words, the British Foreign Office, the foreign part of the British government, said it was a strong risk of further atrocities in the United States, and it does seem as if there now is another one with the Solomon Brothers' Building collapsing. We've got no word yet on causalities. One assumes that the building would have been virtually deserted. Whether this latest collapse is going to influence the President, who we heard about a few moments ago, who was expected to be heading from Nebraska back to Washington, we don't know.”
5: 00 pm (Eastern Time United States) BBC studio reporter states:
“The 47-story Solomon Brothers', situated very close to the World Trade Center, has also just collapsed.”
5: 07 pm (Eastern Time United States) BBC studio reporter states:
“Now more on the latest building collapse in New York, you may have heard a few moments ago we were talking about the Solomon Brothers Building collapsing and indeed it has, and apparently it's only a few hundred yards away from where the World Trade Center Towers were. And it seems that this was not the result of a new attack; it was because the building had been weakened during this morning's attacks. We'll probably find out more about that from our correspondent Jane Standley. Jane, what more can you tell us about the Solomon Brothers' Building and its collapse?” The studio reporter turns in his chair to see the large televisions behind him with his colleague Jane Standley reporting live from New York. She is standing outside from a high vantage point, possibly on a rooftop deck, with a view of the New York City skyline behind her as she begins to confirm to the studio news host that indeed the Solomon Brothers building has collapsed.
There are a few problems with their report that become very clear when watching it again. The first issue is that the Solomon Brothers building hadn’t actually collapsed until 5:20 pm, a full 23 minutes after they announced it. The second problem is that over Jane Standley’s shoulder is the Solomon Brothers Building, otherwise known as WTC7, still standing there as they talk about how it has collapsed. The text scroll on the bottom of the screen reads “The 47-storey Salomon Brothers building close to the World Trade Centre has also collapsed.”
The BBC had actually announced the collapse of a 47-story steel and concrete building, 23 minutes before it actually happened.
How the hell did the BBC know that WTC7 was going to be coming down? The video of the BBC broadcast of that night is easily found online. There was no misinterpretation of their words, it wasn’t an honest mistake, the comments weren’t taken out of context, they screwed up and reported a story before they were supposed to report on it.
originally posted by: dashen
a reply to: ucanthandlethetruth
If israel did it, then america aided and abetted
Cant secure and plant that much nanothermite without showing up on a lot of radars
Thus, the similarities between the Ivan Boesky saga and the Enron story continue to grow. Both reeked of astounding hubris, self-dealing and greed. Boesky, it was argued, ripped off small investors by trading takeover stocks with inside knowledge, and by manipulating securities prices to suit his desires. The same was said of Milken and his brokerage, Drexel Burnham Lambert. Boesky’s testimony was key to the eventual imprisonment of Milken and the bankruptcy of Drexel.
“I stopped being coroner after about 20 minutes because there were no bodies there.”-Wallace Miller, Coroner of Somerset County, Pennsylvania.
He was among the first people to arrive at the alleged Flight 93 crash site on the morning of 9/ 11. The day of September 11th of 2001 was total pandemonium. There was just so much happening, in so many different locations, involving too many people. It is understandable to treat information that was discovered on that chaotic day as unverified, or perhaps classify the information as “this is what we currently know, verification still pending”.
“I got to the actual crash site and could not believe what I saw. Usually, you see much debris, wreckage, and much noise and commotion. This crash was different. There was no wreckage, no bodies, and no noise. It appeared as though there was no passengers or crew on this plane.” –Wallace Miller, Coroner of Somerset County, Pennsylvania.
It is not fair to criticize everyone that misreported information on that day, provided that they later corrected their error and updated their version of the events. It was a confusing and traumatizing day, and the public was starving for information to try and make sense of what had just happened.
“It was really a very unusual site. You almost would’ve thought the passengers had been dropped off somewhere. Even by the standard model of an airplane crash, there was very little, even by those standards.”-Wallace Miller, Coroner of Somerset County, Pennsylvania.
No human remains were found at the crash site, according to a person who knows a thing or two about dead people, the county coroner, Wallace Miller.
“This is the most eerie thing. I have not, to this day, seen a single drop of blood. Not a drop.”-Wallace Miller, Coroner of Somerset County, Pennsylvania.
The coroner said that there were no bodies and no blood at the crash site. None of the 37 people that were aboard that flight were found, no bodies were found, no bones, no blood, no nothing. This is weird, but perhaps this guy is somehow mistaken.
“Several trees were burned badly and there were papers everywhere. We searched. I was told that there were 224 passengers, but later found out that there were actually forty. I was stunned. There was nothing there.”-Faye Hahn, an EMT, responded to the first reports of the crash in Shanksville.
An EMT is saying there were no bodies.
“We were so early that they hadn’t had a chance to set up a barrier for the press. I was able to get right up to the edge of the crater. All I saw was a crater filled with small, charred plane parts. There were no suitcases, no recognizable plane parts, no body parts.”-Jon Meyer, reporter, WJAC-TV, regarding the plane crash in Shanksville. Now a reporter is also saying there were no bodies.
“We arrived in the immediate area and walked up to the crater and the burning woods. My first thought was, ‘Where is the plane?’ Because most of what I saw was this honeycomb looking stuff, which I believe is insulation or something like that. I was not seeing anything that was distinguishable either as human remains or aircraft debris.”–Wells Morrison, FBI agent. An FBI agent is confirming that he did not see any bodies.
What is going on here?
"It didn't look like a plane crash because there was nothing that looked like a plane. I [have] never seen anything like it. Just like a big pile of charcoal."-Homer Barron.
A pile of charcoal is a weird description, but once again, no mention of bodies.
"I was looking for anything that said tail, wing, plane, metal. There was nothing."-photographer Scott Spangler. How could a plane crash in a field not leave parts of the wings or tail? No metal either? "I was amazed because it did not, in any way, shape, or form, look like a plane crash."-Patrick Madigan, Commander of the Somerset barracks, Pennsylvania State Police.
Now we have a police commander saying that there wasn’t a plane in this crash.
"Where is this plane? And where are the people? Thousands of tiny pieces scattered around--bits of metal, insulation, wiring--but no fuselage, no wings, only a smoking crater and charred earth."-Assistant Fire Chief Rick King, driver of the first fire truck to reach the site.
We can add an Assistant Fire Chief to the list of other professionals stating that there was not a plane in this plane crash. There were also no people in this non-plane plane crash.
"… like a trash heap, nothing but tiny pieces of debris. It's just littered with small pieces."-Frank Monaco, Pennsylvania State Police. Another police officer is telling us that the Flight 93 plane crash was missing people.
"There were pieces of debris, small pieces of debris laying everywhere, and there were a lot of papers blowing around, and the ground was on fire. The debris was very, very small. There was actually nothing to tell you that that was an aircraft. Had you not known that that was an aircraft crash, you would've looked at that and you would've said something happened here, but I don't know what."-Lyle Szupinka, Area Commander, Pennsylvania State Police.
Yet another police officer is saying that there was no plane in this plane crash.
"There was no way. The hole wasn't big enough and there was nothing there."-John Maslak.
Maybe the reason why everybody on the scene in Shanksville said that it didn’t look like a plane crash is that there wasn’t a plane crash. If this wasn’t a plane crash, then what made the hole in the ground? Where is Flight 93 then? We were told that there were four planes that were hijacked and that the passengers of Flight 93 rose up and stormed the cockpit, then put the plane down in Shanksville before it was used to fly into the White House.
Here we have at least 11 different people contradicting the official story about the crash of Flight 93 in Shanksville. These witnesses included police officers, a Fire Chief, an FBI agent, a reporter, a professional photographer, an EMT, and the county coroner. They all said there were no bodies in the wreckage. They said there were no airplane parts. No sign of passenger luggage or seats. The official story about the crash of Flight 93 in Shanksville is a lie.
“Because of the asbestos health risks, and their size, the Twin Towers couldn’t be demolished. And because of the asbestos, they couldn’t be upgraded. And disassembling them floor by floor would have run into the double-digit billions of dollars.”
In case you were wondering, Larry Silverstein is alive today because he, coincidentally, didn’t show up for his strict daily routine of breakfast at Window on the World, followed by heading down to his office. He explained that he had a dermatologist appointment that morning that luckily kept him away from his building. Wow, what are the chances of that happening? Larry Silverstein’s two children, Roger and Lisa, also worked in the towers, but how fortunate for them that they too were “running late” and were not in the building when it collapsed. Larry’s publicist, Howard Rubinstein, was also “running late” that day, but it is probably just another coincidence.
So let’s see if we have got this right, Larry Silverstein and Frank Lowy, two very smart and successful commercial real estate developers, bought the #tiest buildings in New York that were half occupied and filled with asbestos. A couple of weeks later, these money pits miraculously came down, for free, and their insurance policies made these two guys billions of dollars?
This is too big of a coincidence.
The United States government still refuses to release its input data on the collapse of WTC7 for independent scientific peer review, due to “reasons of public safety”. Guess what? This is not how innocent parties behave. According to the federal government, there is some strange anomaly that magically turns perfectly good buildings into a fine dust in a matter of seconds, don’t you think that is beneficial for “public safety” to figure out what is causing this? Or is there something that they don’t want the public to discover about why these buildings came down?
Thank you for looking out for our safety, we all feel much better now.
“Now what happens to a society when we all share a secret, but nobody can talk about it? The fact is that the post-9/ 11 society is characterized by lies and fear. This time they #ed up. When you see Building 7 it is obvious, it is so open for everyone ready to see what they see, this time they went too far. We are talking about the fundamental laws of physics.
We are talking about Sir Isaac Newton’s Laws of Motion, and according to these this [official 9/ 11 WTC7 collapse story] is impossible, unless you have applied some force to make the building fall. Gravity cannot do that because when a building is in free fall, all of the energy of the building is going into accelerating the building down. There is no energy left for breaking thousands of steel beams and girders. This is completely basic physics.
There is no way Building 7 could be brought down without application of explosives unless you are ready to violate Sir Isaac Newton’s Lows of Motion, and this hasn’t happened since 1687 yet. So if you claim the official story you are talking about miracles, because a miracle is a violation of the laws of nature, and I don’t believe that.”-Niels Harrit, Emeritus Professor of Chemistry, Copenhagen University. Professor Harrit was a witness in ‘9/ 11 Truth vs. BBC Court Case’.
It seems that people living outside of the United States have a much easier time seeing through the media fog that obscures the truth about this topic, for obvious reasons. The disinformation campaign through the mainstream media in America is pervasive and unrelenting, so it shouldn’t come as much of a surprise that the non-Americans have a different view of the chain of events that happened on that day.
“The 9/ 11 attacks were a global state terror operation permitted by the administration of the USA, which had foreknowledge of the operation, yet remained intentionally unresponsive in order to make war against Afghanistan and Iraq. To put it briefly, the 9/ 11 events were an instance of the strategy of tension enacted by political and economic powers in the USA to seek advantage for the oil and arms industries.”–Judge Ferdinando Imposimato, Honorary President, Italian Supreme Court, and former legal consultant to the United Nations.
In the controlled demolition industry, there are few people more respected than Danny Jowenko, the owner of Jowenko Explosieve Demolitie, a controlled demolitions company headquartered in the Netherlands. With over 30 years of building demolition experience, he was asked to contribute to a documentary about buildings, but he was not told that the building in question was in New York City and that the footage he would be shown was from September 11th.
In September 2006, Jowenko was interviewed by a Dutch filmmaker, who presented him with footage of the destruction of a building and asked his opinion on it. After a couple of minutes, Jowenko concluded that this particular building was clearly brought down as the result of a controlled demolition. "This is professional work, without any doubt," he said, as translated from Flemish to English subtitles.
The filmmaker then informed Jowenko that this was World Trade Center 7 and that it came down the afternoon of September 11th, 2001. The look on his face pretty much said it all, however, he did offer up a hopeful “Are you sure it was the 11th? That can't be.” Jowenko sat there in stunned disbelief.
After that encounter, Jowenko went on to become very vocal about the demolition of all three of the New York buildings that came down on 9/ 11, even joining advocacy groups. Danny Jowenko was killed in a one-car accident in which he hit a tree. Make of that what you will.
“All the intelligence services of America and Europe know full well that the disastrous attack (of 9/ 11) has been planned and realized from the Mossad, with the aid of the Zionist world in order to put under accusation the Arabic countries and in order to induce the Western Powers to take part in Iraq and Afghanistan.”-Francesco Cossiga, former Italian President. He exposed Operation Gladio several decades ago, and he has been vocal about America’s role in the 9/ 11 attacks.
Just in time for the 15 year anniversary of the 9/ 11 attacks, a new forensic investigation into the collapse of the three World Trade Center towers on 9/ 11 was published in Europhysics News, a highly respected European physics magazine.
The article was titled: 15 Years Later: On The Physics Of High Rise Building Collapses, and the conclusion of their study directly contradicts the official story of 9/ 11, which really isn’t much of a surprise. The four scientists conclude that not only was WTC 7 brought down in a controlled demolition, but WTC 1 and 2 were as well, as many people close to the subject had suspected.
“It bears repeating that fires have never caused the total collapse of a steel-framed high-rise before or since 9/ 11. Did we witness an unprecedented event three separate times on September 11, 2001? The NIST reports, which attempted to support that unlikely conclusion, fail to persuade a growing number of architects, engineers, and scientists. Instead, the evidence points overwhelmingly to the conclusion that all three buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition. Given the far-reaching implications, it is morally imperative that this hypothesis is the subject of a truly scientific and impartial investigation by responsible authorities.” -Steven Jones, former professor of Physics, Brigham Young University.
“We are dealing with a criminal undertaking at a global level, and there is an ongoing war, it is led by the United States, it may be carried out by a number of proxy countries, which are obeying orders from Washington. The global war on terrorism is a US undertaking, which is fake, it’s based on fake premises. It tells us that somehow America and the Western world are going after a fictitious enemy, the Islamic state when in fact, the Islamic state is fully supported and financed by the Western military alliance and America’s allies in the Persian Gulf. They say Muslims are terrorists, but it just so happens that terrorists are made in America. They’re not the product of Muslim society, and that should be abundantly clear to everyone on this floor. The global war on terrorism is a fabrication, a big lie and a crime against humanity.”–Dr. Michel Choissudovsky, Canadian economist & Ottawa’s Professor of Economics.
However, when you learn that drills were being run the same time as the 9/ 11 attacks, the 7/ 7 London bombing, the Oklahoma City bombing, the Madrid bombing, the Norway Oslo attacks, the Sandy Hook shooting, the Aurora movie theater shooting, and the Boston bombing, you must understand that this is not a coincidence.
This is a pattern.
“Big Brother in the form of an increasingly powerful government and in an increasingly powerful private sector will pile the records high with reasons why privacy should give way to national security, to law and order, to the efficiency of operation, to scientific advancement and the like.”—William O. Douglas, former U. S. Supreme Court Justice.
“We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”–American President, Barack Obama.
The concept of parole is not a bad one on the surface, but those that have had to bend their entire world just to make sure they don’t break any of the additional rules of their parole will tell you that the system of parole is designed to make sure that the offender comes back to prison. Early release is the bait that they use to entice you to bite on accepting parole, but once you do, it is almost impossible for a person to comply with all of the additional rules, restrictions, terms, and conditions. Parole is the feedback loop that keeps people coming back to prison over and over. So why would the government have any reason to install a revolving door at the entrance to the American prison system? “The concept of parole is not a bad one on the surface, but those that have had to bend their entire world just to make sure they don’t break any of the additional rules of their parole will tell you that the system of parole is designed to make sure that the offender comes back to prison. Early release is the bait that they use to entice you to bite on accepting parole, but once you do, it is almost impossible for a person to comply with all of the additional rules, restrictions, terms, and conditions. Parole is the feedback loop that keeps people coming back to prison over and over. So why would the government have any reason to install a revolving door at the entrance to the American prison system?
“Poor people, especially those of color, are worth nothing to corporations and private contractors if they are on the street. In jail and prisons, however, they can each generate corporate revenues of $ 30,000 to $ 40,000 a year.”-Chris Hedges, author, and journalist.Poor people, especially those of color, are worth nothing to corporations and private contractors if they are on the street. In jail and prisons, however, they can each generate corporate revenues of $ 30,000 to $ 40,000 a year.”-Chris Hedges, author, and journalist.
The emergence of crack coc aine coincides with the rise of private prisons, and that is no accident. Some of these prisons put inmates to work on a variety of things and are paid slave wages, so the prison owners benefit from this because their labor costs are obviously very low.
The “Prison Industrial Complex” costs the American taxpayer around $ 75 billion a year, and it has the highest incarceration rate in the world. According to the Sentencing Project, the prison incarceration rate has increased by 500% over the last four decades, with the prison population exploding by over 800%.
... dozens of states have legalized the contracting of prison labor to corporations, which include such names as IMB, Boeing, Motorola, Microsoft, AT& T, Wireless, and Dell. Some of these inmates are getting approximately $ 2/ hour. What a bargain.
“The major world powers, new and old, also face a novel reality: while the lethality of their military might is greater than ever, their capacity to impose control over the politically awakened masses of the world is at a historic low.
To put it bluntly: in earlier times, it was easier to control one million people than to physically kill one million people; today, it is infinitely easier to kill one million people than to control one million people.”-Zbigniew Brzezinski, Co-Founder, Trilateral Commission.
The choice of PROMIS had the consequence of foreclosing the consideration of alternative case management information system designs. About the time PROMIS was being prepared for transfer, DALITE began operation. Yet no effort was made to determine whether it might provide a better prototype for diffusion than PROMIS. Such a study might have led to adoption of the mini-computer concept that has contributed to the greater success of DALITE in producing logistical support information.
For info on Bear Cat Post, Bill suggested calling Capt. Red McDaniel at American Defense Institute; McDaniel was cellmate to Sen. McCain in Vietnam POW - said that Ross Perot had mentioned meeting E.B. in about 1970 - and said he was probably just as sleazy now as he was then.
- What part of the CIA?
- What is it called?
- Glass Rod?
- Promis Plus?
There is also a reference on the opposite facing page to a book and something I can't quite make out, computer viruses and "white collar"
...an undecipherable city name in Bermuda.
He also wrote a name which may be Wallace Sellars, or something close to it.
where he's written Nichols' name again, along with two other unknown names.
"Odom brought McFarlane's activities [indecipherable] Israelis to the attention of White House"
...indecipherable couple phrases followed by "were only two survivors of Alaskan plane crash."
Venezuela, Panama (I think), Vegas, Brazil, Costa Rica, and maybe Nicaragua. Hard to make out.
originally posted by: ucanthandlethetruth
So when I’m a person who’s read on MK ULTRA and realizes when the programs were “shut down” they only went private. The combination of drugs and hypnosis on mental patients inducing mind control is tech that was unleashed from Pandora’s Box of Evil but we went from Nazi mind control research to America doing it to now who knows who doing it. Controlling minds.
“I was a very minor missionary, actually a heretic, but I toiled wholeheartedly in the vineyards because it was fun, fun, fun. Where else could a red-blooded American boy lie, kill, cheat, steal, rape and pillage with the sanction and blessing of the all-highest?”