It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: ketsuko
Oh..I understand perfectly that there are various "degrees" attached to some crimes. What caught me by surprise, and was hugely disappointing, was Barr declaring, with certainty, that there was NO LEGAL TREASON committed.
But he's careful to say that "IT APPEARS" the Trump campaign "MAY HAVE BEEN" "IMPROPERLY" surveilled.
originally posted by: PilSungMtnMan
That’s my point. Let Barr/Durham have the 18 months (10/31/20) to see what was/was not done.
originally posted by: FlyingFox
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: ketsuko
Oh..I understand perfectly that there are various "degrees" attached to some crimes. What caught me by surprise, and was hugely disappointing, was Barr declaring, with certainty, that there was NO LEGAL TREASON committed.
But he's careful to say that "IT APPEARS" the Trump campaign "MAY HAVE BEEN" "IMPROPERLY" surveilled.
It's a matter of what they did with the surveillance product, if it were treason or just a administrative issue.
originally posted by: PilSungMtnMan
- Q knew it was bogus when posting
- Q had no idea Q would morph into Q
- Q had bad info that was passed on
- Q had good info but action aborted
originally posted by: daskakik
originally posted by: PilSungMtnMan
That’s my point. Let Barr/Durham have the 18 months (10/31/20) to see what was/was not done.
I agree, let them have all the time they need but, there is always a but, I'm going to guess that all posteriors will have been legally covered.
That is how it usually goes. I mean I get that some people have a bias and they already have their guilty verdict but IRL, especially with all the "security issues", they are probably all covered. Add closed doors and redactions and we will probably never know.
originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: cherokeetroy
Who is we? You don't speak for anyone else.
You don't even know if Q is really standing with you.
originally posted by: PilSungMtnMan
a reply to: IAMTAT
That IG finding says “FBI Deputy Assistant Director (DAD)” so that’s got to be McCabe, right?
+++
++
+
Q
Nothing is random.
Everything has meaning.
+++
Q