It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Arbitrageur
I keep saying that Fravor should have turned his camera on. All he had to do was flip the switch on his helmet to record. Why do you think there's a saying "pics or it didn't happen?" I believe Fravor saw something but obviously there's some skepticism and even the Nimitz report says that he and his WSO had conflicting reports on the speed of the object, Fravor saying it was hovering and the WSO saying it was going about 500 knots; they can't both be right.
“I guess you’re being diplomatic, but some of the stories and claims that have been made by people, who may have been on those ships, are just bull#.”
TTSA released three videos, but none of those show anything that interesting once you understand them.
originally posted by: celltypespecific
a reply to: ConfusedBrit
New Lue Interview (Former Head of Pentagon's UFO Program)
Lue latest Interview
Why is Fravor that much more erm bankable than the rest?
originally posted by: ConfusedBrit
And Fravor discounting Kevin Day's own story doesn't help matters, especially since Day was the Star of 'Unidentified''s second episode. Again, I have to ask why Corbell deleted Fravor's comments from the video of Fravor, Curious George and Corbell on stage at the 2019 McMinnville UFO Fest. More details here
As George told Fravor:
“I guess you’re being diplomatic, but some of the stories and claims that have been made by people, who may have been on those ships, are just bull#.”
Thanks for the link, that's a very interesting article. So it's not just Fravor and his WSO that disagree on what happened, there are other disagreements.
originally posted by: ConfusedBrit
And Fravor discounting Kevin Day's own story doesn't help matters, especially since Day was the Star of 'Unidentified''s second episode. Again, I have to ask why Corbell deleted Fravor's comments from the video of Fravor, Curious George and Corbell on stage at the 2019 McMinnville UFO Fest. More details here
As George told Fravor:
“I guess you’re being diplomatic, but some of the stories and claims that have been made by people, who may have been on those ships, are just bull#.”
Why is Fravor that much more erm bankable than the rest?
Maybe but excuse me if I don't fall off the edge of my chair in anticipation, after the disappointment that was the first three videos they released.
originally posted by: celltypespecific
a reply to: Arbitrageur
Arbitrageur....TTSA has approximately 21 videos cleared for release....
You will see...
They know how to manipulate the media very well and will not simply give away the "goods"
Media has a short attention span....hence SLOW DRIP.... STEADY BURN....
I read a lot of Condign, and so did Isaac Koi, and I pretty much agree with Isaac Koi's assessment which he posted in an ATS thread. If you're so inclined you might want to read that instead.
originally posted by: zazzafrazz
He also mentioned we might find the 'answer' in Condign. I didn't read it all lol....I told him I did, but it was just more Mystery Peddling that doesn't engage me .
The report put way too much emphasis on the plasma theory, which as Isaac said doesn't mean the plasma theory doesn't explain some events, it certainly might, but probably not to the extent that the report suggests and it's disappointing that the evidence in the report doesn't even really point to the plasma hypothesis as Isaac says.
Conclusion
Even on a preliminary review of its content, numerous severe flaws in the Condign Report can be readily identified.
As stated above, the severe flaws in the Condign Report highlighted below do _not_ mean that the plasma theory (or any other theory) is necessarily wrong, and they certainly do not mean that the claims that extraterrestrials are visiting Earth are true. Publications of such sloppy quality give skepticism a bad name.