It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump told to ‘resign or be impeached’

page: 8
23
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 18 2019 @ 11:57 AM
link   
Not phased?

"Kevin Corke, @FoxNews “Don’t forget, Michael Cohen has already been convicted of perjury and fraud, and as recently as this week, the Wall Street Journal has suggested that he may have stolen tens of thousands of dollars....” Lying to reduce his jail time! Watch father-in-law!"

He seems positively unhinged, TBH.




posted on Jan, 18 2019 @ 11:58 AM
link   
a reply to: JDmOKI



Why are we hearing this now? You can't keep a secret in Washington

I think that Robert Mueller has proven that you can.



posted on Jan, 18 2019 @ 11:59 AM
link   

originally posted by: knoxie
a reply to: Arnie123


his tweeting about border security proves to you he's just peachy today, totally doesn't care about this new news?

bless your heart.



Yup, why talk about fake news? It's intentions are for optics.

It's silly but also pitiful to see you grasping this Buzzfeed report as your saving grace, so, where is the sizzle? 😏



posted on Jan, 18 2019 @ 11:59 AM
link   

originally posted by: FilthyUSMonkey

originally posted by: LSU2018

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

To be fair it was ultimately an unnamed source that led to Nixon's resignation.


A lot has changed in 45 years.


The Constitution of the United State of America?


The technology to find evidence.



posted on Jan, 18 2019 @ 12:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: Beach Bum
a reply to: FilthyUSMonkey

Mr Trump to be removed if the claims, first published by Buzzfeed News, are proven. There's your first problem first published by Buzzfeed. lmao


Are you saying buzz feed isn't a good source for news?

Weird, because they are on some next level s###.

They can guess your favorite color if you take a quiz telling them your favorite food.




posted on Jan, 18 2019 @ 12:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: FilthyUSMonkey

originally posted by: Speedtek

originally posted by: ADVISOR
a reply to: FilthyUSMonkey

How much trouble does one get in for selling uranium to Russia?


How much uranium was sold to Russia? None.
Is this retro-day?


They still think the golden oldies will work. Meanwhile:

57 percent of voters would not vote to re-elect President Donald Trump in 2020, a new poll finds
Source


57 percent of registered voters saying they would "definitely" vote against re-electing the current White House occupant to a second term, according to the results of a brand-new poll from PBS NewsHour, NPR and Marist.



large number of voters who oppose Trump, as well as his low job approval ratings, suggest the president faces a "steep, steep incline" on the road to re-election. "The president has had his base and not much else,"



among Republicans, 69 percent said they planned to vote for Trump in 2020, while 10 percent said they would vote against him and 21 percent said they were "unsure." Along those lines, nearly all Democrats — 91 percent — said they planned to vote against the nation's leader, while 5 percent said they would vote for Trump and another 5 percent said they did not know who they would support in 2020. Meanwhile, 62 percent of independents said they plan to vote against Trump, while 25 percent said they would vote to re-elect him. Thirteen percent of independents said they were unsure.


Uh-oh. With poll numbers like that, Trump better not bother running. He should go ahead and resign.



posted on Jan, 18 2019 @ 12:02 PM
link   
a reply to: matafuchs

Guess trump should accuse him of something. Have his DOJ arrest this guy. LOL.

The Godfather is fiction. Much like trumps innocence.



posted on Jan, 18 2019 @ 12:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: MisterSpock
a reply to: FilthyUSMonkey

Ohh a poll, how quaint, and you believe it too. That's absolutely adorable.



And his poll numbers are higher now than they were on election day. Kinda lets you know who gets polled.



posted on Jan, 18 2019 @ 12:04 PM
link   
a reply to: LSU2018

Yeah, his opponent, whoever it is has a 97.5% chance of beating him... I know this because of polls.



posted on Jan, 18 2019 @ 12:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: FilthyUSMonkey
Michael Cohen's got the receipts - Possible new evidence against Trump is more damning than ever. But Republicans don't care whether he's guilty
Source


Perhaps most important, Leopold and Cormier report that there are text messages, internal memos and emails to prove this — throwing a wrench in Trump's legal strategy of writing Cohen off as a liar and turning the issue into a "he said/he said" standoff....there's little doubt that instructing your lawyer to lie to Congress is a crime


Uh oh. Emails, memos and text...Looks bad for Trump.

Also, Cohen was known for recording meetings and phone calls...


So let's see them.



posted on Jan, 18 2019 @ 12:08 PM
link   
a reply to: Xtrozero

Where is it recorded that Cohen is a tax lawyer?

He was not a tax lawyer... ever

You just make it up as you go along or something?


Cohen was a vice-president of The Trump Organization, and the personal counsel to Trump, and was often described by media as Trump's "fixer".[3][4] He previously served as co-president of Trump Entertainment and was a board member of the Eric Trump Foundation, a children's health charity.[5] From 2017 to 2018, Cohen was deputy finance chairman of the Republican National Committee.[6][7]


Not a friggin thing about being a tax lawyer. He began as a personal injury lawyer.... ambulance chaser...



posted on Jan, 18 2019 @ 12:09 PM
link   
a reply to: CriticalStinker


Are you serious?

Buzzfeed is where you take a quiz to find out what your Patronus is.

Buzzfeed News is where you find more than a dozen Pulitzer Prizes awarded over the past two years.

You guys have lost your minds. Directing a subordinate to lie to congress is how Nixon got bent.

Witness tampering and intimidation are felonies. The medium does not mitigate the crime.

It's like Trump is the UFO none of you want to beieve in. I salute your commitment, but these are serious allegations and Congress has already commited to investigating them.



posted on Jan, 18 2019 @ 12:12 PM
link   
a reply to: 0zzymand0s




Buzzfeed is where you take a quiz to find out what your Patronus is.


And yet every news outlet is running the story.








Can you link to the patronus quiz?









.
edit on 1182019 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 18 2019 @ 12:12 PM
link   
a reply to: 0zzymand0s

When you cannot cope with the accusation, attack the source. Logical fallacy 101.



posted on Jan, 18 2019 @ 12:13 PM
link   
Your next glorious leader:



posted on Jan, 18 2019 @ 12:13 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme


Because it's not from Buzzfeed, house of astrology. It's from Buzzfeed News, home of the Pulitzer.



posted on Jan, 18 2019 @ 12:16 PM
link   
a reply to: 0zzymand0s

Buzzfeed News is where you find more than a dozen Pulitzer Prizes awarded over the past two years.

I'm so sorry, they look to be the bastion of journalism.



Listen, their stories may be legitimate, but their site is cancer, and anytime I've been it's been laughable.



posted on Jan, 18 2019 @ 12:18 PM
link   
a reply to: Speedtek

Impeachment is a process, not an outcome. We should not forget this.

I agree that some of the posters don't want to talk about Impeaching Trump, and would rather say

1. It is a lie
2. The source is not credible

and next they will move on to:

3. It doesn't matter, it is not a crime,

and

4. You can't charge a sitting president with a crime, even though he committed one.

This is a different sort of process than the one that will be used to Impeach Donald Trump


edit on 18-1-2019 by FilthyUSMonkey because: so



posted on Jan, 18 2019 @ 12:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: Speedtek

originally posted by: LSU2018

originally posted by: FilthyUSMonkey
a reply to: LSU2018

Mueller's investigation has not even been going on for two years (May 17,2017). Watergate June 17, 1972. Nixon resign August 9, 1974.

Give it time.



Do you realize how much more technologically advanced we are today than we were in 1972? There would've been an indictment within a month if there was anything to indict Trump on. How much longer should I wait, 6 more years? At least when Trump finishes his second term we won't have to hear "just you wait, something's there!" anymore.


Except that there is an ongoing investigation - I'm not sure why people do not understand this. They do not prosecute on 'parts' if it it effects the rest of the investigation. When it wraps up and the final report is given, assuming wrongdoing is found, then the hammer will drop. Stating 'nothing has been done so far' is not a proof of innocence, Muller holds his cards close to his chest.


That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that we're technologically advanced enough - especially compared to 1972 - that it doesn't take this long to find the data and evidence they've been looking for.



posted on Jan, 18 2019 @ 12:21 PM
link   
a reply to: 0zzymand0s


Buzzfeed News is where you find more than a dozen Pulitzer Prizes awarded over the past two years.


Also, please source that, I just searched and found in the last two years they had two finalists.



new topics

top topics



 
23
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join