It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
If there’s one archaeological find that would turn the world on its head it would be the discovery of the lost city of Atlantis. Many have looked for the remains of the mythical locale, but nobody has come close to actually finding it and researchers claiming to have found it in the past have all ultimately been proven wrong.
Now, with a suite of high-tech hardware at its disposal, a company called Merlin Burrows believes it might have finally pinpointed the location where the city once stood. Needless to say, you should take everything you read from this point on with a huge grain of salt.
So my guess is that we're looking for a much smaller, Renaissance-era civilization concentrated on the coastlines who may have had some magic tricks up their sleeve for moving and shaping stone. There is no woo-woo necessary for this scenario to work.
originally posted by: toysforadults
a reply to: schuyler
So my guess is that we're looking for a much smaller, Renaissance-era civilization concentrated on the coastlines who may have had some magic tricks up their sleeve for moving and shaping stone. There is no woo-woo necessary for this scenario to work.
I would like to highlight the most important part of your post.
There's more to the story than what meets the eye due to the fact that we do not truly understand energy systems and their affect on the manifestation of our observable physical plane.
The key to finding out what happened to Atlantis is in understanding the frequency of this place. What we see of Shambala, or Atlantis or Lemuria or Tartaria or whatever anybody wants to call it may in fact be what we're able to experience from our current place in the evolutionary timeline.
More precisely, the particle is a quantized manifestation of a field (the Higgs field) that generates mass through its interaction with other particles. But why couldn’t mass just be assumed as a given?
A classical field theory is a physical theory that predicts how one or more physical fields interact with matter through field equations.
Electric fields are created by differences in voltage: the higher the voltage, the stronger will be the resultant field. Magnetic fields are created when electric current flows: the greater the current, the stronger the magnetic field. An electric field will exist even when there is no current flowing. If current does flow, the strength of the magnetic field will vary with power consumption but the electric field strength will be constant.
The question of whether or not there is an objective reality has plagued philosophers for centuries. It still does. How do we know any of what we see or hear is real? Do we construct our world with our perceptions? Or is there really something there? Robert Lanza’s recent book “Biocentrism” takes the stance that conscious life *creates* the universe, that there is no reality other than that which we create. This post will show why he is wrong.
originally posted by: toysforadults
a reply to: schuyler
Energy and frequency is actually the most fundamental science we have.
You may lack an understanding of how particles interact on a sub atomic level but don't go making bold claims due to your own ignorance.
Higgs Boson