It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: DigginFoTroof
This may surprise you but, not all votes are counted in an election. When the math supports a winner. Then a winner is declared.
It's when the votes are close. Then all votes must be counted.
This is normal and a problem.
We are in the day and age when we do not need to be using paper ballots. There are these great things called websites or phone apps that can be used to let people vote. And you can vote from home. Imagine that. And we'd have instant numbers. No more waiting a week to tally all the ballots. If security is a concern. A old fashioned printout of your vote could be done to keep for your records. It can be done. Why aren't we doing it?
have republicans ever done anything like that?
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Wardaddy454
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Wardaddy454
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Wardaddy454
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: Annee
There was no proper chain of custody for votes. There were clear violations of procedure. There are now no guarantees. That's really the point.
They failed the country. By cheating or by failing to do their job competently.
It doesn't matter. We deserve better than this BS.
And you'd feel the same way if it was the GOP making mistakes?
I doubt it.
ALL votes need to be counted.
The shenanigans of vote suppression needs to end.
Remember when the overseas votes weren't counted in 2012?
Pepefarms remembers.
I remember 2000 when the Supreme Court voted to retroactively allow military votes that were not valid due to late or no post date.
Military votes tend to favor Republicans.
Then the Florida Supreme Court chose Bush rather then allowing a legitimate vote count.
BTW: I voted for Bush.
After Gore got his two recounts.
Selective recounts is NOT counting ALL votes.
BTW - I voted for Bush
So you're saying all votes should be counted, including fraudulent votes?
And you keep saying you voted for Bush, like it matters or holds some relevance to your stance.
You rejected my article/link on fraudulent voting -- so, there's little point to continuing.
originally posted by: Annee
She held them in storage for 12 months.
Yes, it was a mistake -- cuz it should have been 22 months.
They're still available digitally.
originally posted by: toysforadults
we can't trust the voting process and anyone who tells you otherwise is not analyzing the situation correctly
originally posted by: Bicent
The only problem I have with the recounts is it’s all democrat votes appearing and no republican votes. That sounds fishy.. yet in 2018 their is no such thing as right and wrong..
originally posted by: Wardaddy454
originally posted by: Bicent
The only problem I have with the recounts is it’s all democrat votes appearing and no republican votes. That sounds fishy.. yet in 2018 their is no such thing as right and wrong..
Exactly.
As it stands, only one candidate is gaining from these "found" votes.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: DBCowboy
I should have voted for "the one who will not be named."
Kinda disappointed with the whole process.
As campaign manager for the ZNC I can tell you that a vote for her is like a vote for free giant beers in every fridge and a brown recluse in every slipper.