It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Another woman brings sexual allegation against Kavanaugh

page: 14
42
<< 11  12  13    15  16  17 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 24 2018 @ 06:42 AM
link   
a reply to: annoyedpharmacist


So know we know why they wanted to drag this out.....the democrats had an army of PI's out there trying to dig up dirt.


Correct. They are doing to Trump's nomination what the Republicans did to Obama's... running out the clock to the election. Choosing Kavanaugh was a huge mistake. The Democrats will have no problem smearing a white guy. If Trump wasn't such a racist misogynist, he would have realized that nominating a woman or a minority would have put the Democrats on the wrong foot. Oh well.




posted on Sep, 24 2018 @ 06:49 AM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

Right... it's Trump's fault the Dims have gone completely batsh** crazy.

FFS



posted on Sep, 24 2018 @ 06:59 AM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: annoyedpharmacist


So know we know why they wanted to drag this out.....the democrats had an army of PI's out there trying to dig up dirt.


Correct. They are doing to Trump's nomination what the Republicans did to Obama's... running out the clock to the election. Choosing Kavanaugh was a huge mistake. The Democrats will have no problem smearing a white guy. If Trump wasn't such a racist misogynist, he would have realized that nominating a woman or a minority would have put the Democrats on the wrong foot. Oh well.


Actually, since Kavanaugh actually agrees with Garland on 90% of the issues, I would think Trump did make a good choice. It was a chance to try once again to bring our divisive government back together.

Unfortunately, the only thing is the Dems showing their own hypocrisy. I am glad he chose a nominee based on his actual merits and not just choose someone based on race nor gender! That shows integrity, something many on the left simply do not understand.



posted on Sep, 24 2018 @ 07:08 AM
link   
I find it hilarious that the second accuser actually called old Yale schoolmates to ask if they remember Kavanaugh waving his penis in her face.

Imagine getting that call from someone you had not spoken to for around 30 years.

Wonder how that conversation went.....



posted on Sep, 24 2018 @ 07:11 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Grambler

Isnt it time to just say NEXT... This guy is flawed. Time to move on. No one has anything invested in this guy and he's not the last possible candidate for the position.

hahahahaha
no date no location but NEXT....
nice try
I hope they vote him in TODAY



posted on Sep, 24 2018 @ 07:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: annoyedpharmacist


So know we know why they wanted to drag this out.....the democrats had an army of PI's out there trying to dig up dirt.


Correct. They are doing to Trump's nomination what the Republicans did to Obama's... running out the clock to the election. Choosing Kavanaugh was a huge mistake. The Democrats will have no problem smearing a white guy. If Trump wasn't such a racist misogynist, he would have realized that nominating a woman or a minority would have put the Democrats on the wrong foot. Oh well.


Great to see people that dislike trumo admitting this is all just a political ploy

Does it upset you that they are attempting to ruin a mans life, and causing great damage to every real victim of sexual assault just to play politics?

Do you think the fact that Dems will attack any white make makes them racist and misandrist?



posted on Sep, 24 2018 @ 07:30 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Grambler

Isnt it time to just say NEXT... This guy is flawed. Time to move on. No one has anything invested in this guy and he's not the last possible candidate for the position.
Yes he's so flawed he decided to stay and fight it out with the despicable Dems.



posted on Sep, 24 2018 @ 07:32 AM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

Since this is becoming a recurring theme, maybe there should by an investigation.

Of course, the accusers will have to file a formal their cases through the standard F B I channels and fill out all the necessary papers work to initiate the investigation. Even if there is not sufficient details to allow for a complete and through investigation these things must be done.

I would hope if nothing can be found to back up the charges being made, these women are prepared to face the possibility of themselves being charged with filling false reports to the F B I. This is not a small matter and could bring about some serious fines or jail time. It could also have a negative impact on their futures as well. So it should not be taken lightly.

Now, with this in mind, do you think they "really" want an F B I investigation into stories which they may have just made up about events which didn't happen thirty years ago.



posted on Sep, 24 2018 @ 07:34 AM
link   

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
And this woman also has connections to George Soros!

Great find!



posted on Sep, 24 2018 @ 07:35 AM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

Actually, it's really not the same.

The Republicans just didn't move procedure forward on Garland.

The Dems are smearing a man's life and future to prevent procedure from taking place.

If you look back at history, there is precedent for the former, but this pretty much a recent tactic for the latter.



posted on Sep, 24 2018 @ 07:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: Vasa Croe
I find it hilarious that the second accuser actually called old Yale schoolmates to ask if they remember Kavanaugh waving his penis in her face.

Imagine getting that call from someone you had not spoken to for around 30 years.

Wonder how that conversation went.....


Now we know why 6 more days were demanded by Ford.
Democrats needed 6 days to jog Ramirez's memory that it was Kavanaugh.

BTW: Did you just say "penis"?
It says in your post that you said "penis".

penis.



posted on Sep, 24 2018 @ 07:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: Vasa Croe
I find it hilarious that the second accuser actually called old Yale schoolmates to ask if they remember Kavanaugh waving his penis in her face.

Imagine getting that call from someone you had not spoken to for around 30 years.

Wonder how that conversation went.....


Now we know why 6 more days were demanded by Ford.
Democrats needed 6 days to jog Ramirez's memory that it was Kavanaugh.

BTW: Did you just say "penis"?
It says in your post that you said "penis".

penis.


The penis mightier than the sword.



posted on Sep, 24 2018 @ 07:45 AM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT

I once lost my car keys so I went to a porn lawyer to help jog my memory.

Of course it was only then that I realized that Kavanaugh touched me.


Penis.



posted on Sep, 24 2018 @ 07:50 AM
link   
let's not derail this thread with dicking around, ok?



posted on Sep, 24 2018 @ 07:57 AM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: IAMTAT

I once lost my car keys so I went to a porn lawyer to help jog my memory.

Of course it was only then that I realized that Kavanaugh touched me.


Penis.



It's clear they wanted the six days to make her cock-sure about it being Kavanaugh.



posted on Sep, 24 2018 @ 07:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: Grambler

As Senate Republicans press for a swift vote to confirm Brett Kavanaugh, President Trump’s nominee to the Supreme Court, Senate Democrats are investigating a new allegation of sexual misconduct against Kavanaugh. The claim dates to the 1983-84 academic school year, when Kavanaugh was a freshman at Yale University. The offices of at least four Democratic senators have received information about the allegation, and at least two have begun investigating it. Senior Republican staffers also learned of the allegation last week and, in conversations with The New Yorker, expressed concern about its potential impact on Kavanaugh’s nomination. Soon after, Senate Republicans issued renewed calls to accelerate the timing of a committee vote. The Democratic Senate offices reviewing the allegations believe that they merit further investigation. “This is another serious, credible, and disturbing allegation against Brett Kavanaugh. It should be fully investigated,” Senator Mazie Hirono, of Hawaii, said. An aide in one of the other Senate offices added, “These allegations seem credible, and we’re taking them very seriously. If established, they’re clearly disqualifying.”

The woman at the center of the story, Deborah Ramirez, who is fifty-three, attended Yale with Kavanaugh, where she studied sociology and psychology. Later, she spent years working for an organization that supports victims of domestic violence. The New Yorker contacted Ramirez after learning of her possible involvement in an incident involving Kavanaugh. The allegation was conveyed to Democratic senators by a civil-rights lawyer. For Ramirez, the sudden attention has been unwelcome, and prompted difficult choices. She was at first hesitant to speak publicly, partly because her memories contained gaps because she had been drinking at the time of the alleged incident. In her initial conversations with The New Yorker, she was reluctant to characterize Kavanaugh’s role in the alleged incident with certainty. After six days of carefully assessing her memories and consulting with her attorney, Ramirez said that she felt confident enough of her recollections to say that she remembers Kavanaugh had exposed himself at a drunken dormitory party, thrust his penis in her face, and caused her to touch it without her consent as she pushed him away. Ramirez is now calling for the F.B.I. to investigate Kavanaugh’s role in the incident. “I would think an F.B.I. investigation would be warranted,” she said.


www.newyorker.com... aughs-college-years-deborah-ramirez

Will comment more after reading again.

The jist is that she says kavanaigh expoised his penis and made her touch it as a freshman at yale.

It seems extremely convenient that another allegation would come up now, after kavanaugh was supposed to have been voted on.

But that dosent mean this woman might not be telling the truth


you left out these gems from your link



“The magazine contacted several dozen classmates of Ramirez and Kavanaugh regarding the incident”




”The New Yorker has not confirmed with other eyewitnesses that Kavanaugh was present at the party.”




The former friend who was married to the male classmate alleged to be involved, and who signed the statement, said of Ramirez, “This is a woman I was best friends with. We shared intimate details of our lives. And I was never told this story by her, or by anyone else. It never came up. I didn’t see it; I never heard of it happening.” She said she hadn’t spoken with Ramirez for about ten years, but that the two women had been close all through college, and Kavanaugh had remained part of what she called their “larger social circle.” In an initial conversation with The New Yorker, she suggested that Ramirez may have been politically motivated. Later, she said that she did not know if this was the case.





“In a statement, two of those male classmates who Ramirez alleged were involved the incident, the wife of a third male student she said was involved, and three other classmates, Dino Ewing, Louisa Garry, and Dan Murphy, disputed Ramirez’s account of events: “We were the people closest to Brett Kavanaugh during his first year at Yale. He was a roommate to some of us, and we spent a great deal of time with him, including in the dorm where this incident allegedly took place. Some of us were also friends with Debbie Ramirez during and after her time at Yale.” “We can say with confidence that if the incident Debbie alleges ever occurred, we would have seen or heard about it—and we did not. The behavior she describes would be completely out of character for Brett. In addition, some of us knew Debbie long after Yale, and she never described this incident until Brett’s Supreme Court nomination was pending. Editors from the New Yorker contacted some of us because we are the people who would know the truth, and we told them that we never saw or heard about this.””


No one the magazine reached out to will back this ladys story.
Why is this even a thing?



posted on Sep, 24 2018 @ 07:58 AM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT


I find her flaccid accusation, limp.



posted on Sep, 24 2018 @ 08:00 AM
link   
a reply to: ketsuko

The end result would be exactly the same...



Kavanagh won’t be fired from his job on the court of appeals and I doubt seriously anyone of any influence truly believes the accusations are of the life long variety even if by some chance they are true.


That is the way life works... you do something crappy, then your victim does something crappier . Was , rinse repeat



posted on Sep, 24 2018 @ 08:01 AM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: IAMTAT


I find her flaccid accusation, limp.



I doubt it would stand up in court.



posted on Sep, 24 2018 @ 08:01 AM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT

Of course not..

Indecent exposure has a statued of limitation.



new topics

top topics



 
42
<< 11  12  13    15  16  17 >>

log in

join