It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

FBI Agent Peter Strzok Decided Which Hillary Emails On Weiner’s Laptop Could Be Examined By FBI

page: 5
38
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 29 2018 @ 02:29 PM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody


and to think for a second I thought you had posted actual facts about actual crimes..........


Try this:
www.politico.com...

The company he keeps means nothing to you, does it?




posted on Aug, 29 2018 @ 02:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: Butterfinger
a reply to: DJW001

Dont flatter yourself, I dont really remember you in specific terms. The statement in question would be one that would/could sully one's reputation.




It sure sounded like you did. Are you admitting that you were just throwing out a baseless opinion?



posted on Aug, 29 2018 @ 02:32 PM
link   
a reply to: DJW001


You post about crimes as if they have been committed and then you post this?


The company he keeps means nothing to you, does it?

Guilt by association with you people eh?



posted on Aug, 29 2018 @ 02:33 PM
link   

pedophile, Anthony Weiner


I stopped reading after that...Weiner is a lot of things, pedophile is not one of them, but hey I guess it makes the story sound better. Good, true journalism doesn't that though on either side.



posted on Aug, 29 2018 @ 03:38 PM
link   
a reply to: Xtrozero

So, what do you call someone sexting with a minor?



posted on Aug, 29 2018 @ 04:37 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

"Present me the person, I'll present the crime."

Warrants are always limited in scope. Why would this be different? We are supposed to be against open investigation without constraints. The warrant was limited to the scope of the investigation into her mishandling of information as SoS which was the crime being investigated.


It's certainly not a good look for the Bureau though that he was the one making the decision. I'm not at all convinced it was the wrong decision.



posted on Aug, 29 2018 @ 04:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: shooterbrody


and to think for a second I thought you had posted actual facts about actual crimes..........


Try this:
www.politico.com...

The company he keeps means nothing to you, does it?


Hmmm.....some people keep far far worse company, pedophiles, and defend them, and get them off even when she knows they are guilty, and even laugh about it....does the following mean anything to you ?




...but you would still vote for her...?
edit on 29-8-2018 by M5xaz because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 29 2018 @ 05:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: DJW001


You post about crimes as if they have been committed and then you post this?


The company he keeps means nothing to you, does it?

Guilt by association with you people eh?

Why not? Trump supporters always do it with you know who. (See above.)



posted on Aug, 29 2018 @ 06:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: DJW001


You post about crimes as if they have been committed and then you post this?


The company he keeps means nothing to you, does it?

Guilt by association with you people eh?

Why not? Trump supporters always do it with you know who. (See above.)

Hahahaha
What a joke
What is seriously deranged is you have no issue with it
And why would you
It is all you people have done for the last 2 years with your epic tantrum



posted on Aug, 30 2018 @ 12:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: Simon_Boudreaux


So, what do you call someone sexting with a minor?



How old was the minor...I'm not saying he isn't some weird pervert, but to label someone a pedophile means that they are sexually attracted to pre-adolescent age. This is actually a mental disorder that is incurable. Is that what you saying what Wiener is?

I typically don't harp on this too much but lately it seems it is all about the label and people in 2018 seem to want to label people with whatever would generate the most negative impact, and I feel if one is going to label they should be extremely accurate in that label, otherwise it means little outside of trying to prove a point that must be lacking to feel the need to label like this in the first place.



posted on Aug, 30 2018 @ 05:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: DJW001


You post about crimes as if they have been committed and then you post this?


The company he keeps means nothing to you, does it?

Guilt by association with you people eh?

Why not? Trump supporters always do it with you know who. (See above.)


Except that in Hillary's case, it's not mere guilt by association innuendo.
Hillary did choose to defend a pedophile and get him off.



new topics

top topics



 
38
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join