BRUCE G. OHR - Key Player in the Ongoing Coup Attempt Against President Trump.

a reply to: vinifalou

I doubt much will be heard from that rabble today.
The rushia thing has uncoiled upon its perpetrators.

a reply to: vinifalou

CNN actually is covering it - sort of.
It is so full of lies and glowing praise for Ohr, that I am not even going to link to it.
They are totally omitting the real reason for his testimony, and blaming it on Trump wanting to be rid of him.

GOP lawmakers grill DOJ official Ohr over Trump dossier

Gaetz, emerging from the interview after nearly two hours, said Ohr appeared to be answering questions forthrightly but that his testimony about the timing of his contacts with Fusion appeared to conflict with answers given to lawmakers by Fusion GPS cofounder Glenn Simpson and former FBI attorney Lisa Page.

“Either Bruce Ohr’s lying or Glenn Simpson’s lying,” Gaetz said, describing “a number of factual conflicts” between their testimony.

Gaetz, Meadows and Issa told reporters that Ohr’s testimony revealed that the FBI had more significant doubts about the credibility of the Steele dossier than the bureau revealed when it applied for a court-ordered surveillance warrant on a former Trump campaign adviser, Carter Page, in October 2016.

“Not only did the FBI know that the dossier was unverified, but they also knew that there were real credibility issues where it would never end up in a courtroom,” Meadows said.

I really wish this was an open session.

originally posted by: vinifalou
a reply to: shooterbrody

This whole Russia thing is going down to the river.

If there is nothing to fear, why isn't CNN reporting the Ohr's testimony? So obvious.

Anyone? Silly? No? No one?

Thought so.

CNN has already reported on it....the "Russia thing" would stand without Ohr....you do know that they have other sources, right?....what next?...pizzagate? birtherism?....the constant fear and paranoia displayed on ATS for the last ten years have made critical-thinking a liability to the right-wing

a reply to: jimmyx

"Reported" is you giving much credit to them.

a reply to: jimmyx

You do understand the application for fisa warrants were denied without the steele dossier?
You should look up fruit of the poisonous tree.
This is effectively the end of the mueller investigation as it was founded on bs.

a reply to: shooterbrody

I doubt it.

a reply to: shooterbrody

And that fairy tale never happened either.

www.foxnews.com...

Special Agent Jonathan Moffa, who worked with controversial former FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, testified last Friday behind closed doors before the House Judiciary Committee and House Oversight Committee. A source with knowledge of his testimony confirmed to Fox News that Moffa said FBI personnel would use media reports based on information they leaked to justify applications for Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrants.

House Freedom Caucus Chairman Mark Meadows, R-N.C., told Fox News on Tuesday that the committee had evidence of the FBI’s practice that would be “hard to refute.” “We know that some people at the Department of Justice and the FBI actually gave information to the media, then the stories were reported. Then they used those reports to justify further investigations,” Meadows said on “America’s Newsroom” Tuesday. “You know, that’s like saying, we’re going to incriminate on one hand, and be the jury on the other. It just doesn’t work that way.”

(((Timber!!!)))

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: shooterbrody

And that fairy tale never happened either.

bring more than pocket lint and your opinion, or at least let everyone know it is just your opinion

a reply to: Sillyolme

Thanks for your amazing input in the discussion, as well as your contribution.

Mankind will never forgets.

a reply to: shooterbrody

And it provides a written record we can use later.

a reply to: Sillyolme

What if the FBI leaked information to the media and then used this same information to obtain the FISA warrant?

What's your opinion on that?

I know that either you'll deflect from my question or you'll just disappear from the thread.

Either way I'll be happy.

a reply to: DBCowboy

You're not even in the canoe.

a reply to: shooterbrody

We're not Worthy.


You got that much right.

a reply to: shooterbrody

Why do you think page IS important? Roger Stone is more important I believe.

a reply to: vinifalou

Because the testimony is not open to the press. It's behind closed doors.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: DBCowboy

You're not even in the canoe.

Silly silly silly.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: vinifalou

Because the testimony is not open to the press. It's behind closed doors.

Did he show up? Any video?

a reply to: Sillyolme

So because the testimony isn't open to the press they shouldn't inform the public what is going on?