It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Apollo 15 Astronaut Says Humans Are Descendants Of Ancient Aliens

page: 17
102
<< 14  15  16   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 24 2018 @ 07:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: ThatDidHappen


The ancient stone-builders were not people because people could not
raise the Great Pyramid, it is beyond human capability.


It sounds like you got your inaccurate information from people like Erich von Däniken and others who didn't understand (or maybe didn't even try to understand) how the Pyramids were built, so they just said "since I don't understand it, it must have been done through some non-conventional/alien/mystical manner."

The reality of it is that we have a pretty good understanding of the general way the Pyramids were built. Some of the details are still a mystery, but people studying the Pyramids from an engineering and construction perspective have found many signs of how it was done (signs of hoistways, chisel marks, the tools themselves, quarries with more chisel marks , hieroglyphs showing how the quarried stones were moved the remnants of the builders' villages, etc.)

There were plenty of misunderstandings and incorrect assumptions by von Däniken and people after him that led to the myth of "it's impossible for humans to have built it" such as the false idea that ALL of the stones used in the Pyramid were cut smoothly and set in their place carefully, which would have been impossible to do in the time.

What he failed to understand was that only the exposed stones and other key structural stones are cut smooth; the rest that make up the bulk if the volume of the Pyramids are just rubble stones and the spoils of the cut stones. Most could just be dumped in between the structural walls of the pyramid.

Considering this, there was plenty of time for humans build the pyramids. They knew how to cut and move stones, and they knew how to hoist them into position, and they had the manpower required to do it in enough time...

...so if ancient Egyptian people had the conventional means to do it, why wouldn't they be able to do it?

Erich von Däniken didn't do his due diligence in trying to understand how, and jumped to his conclusions way too soon without any real investigation.




posted on Sep, 26 2018 @ 09:27 AM
link   
a reply to: whereislogic

Think of larvae forms...

In our earth science we only think of larvae forms being small and insect based... yet "they" rule this planet simply based on biomass than all mammals and reptiles combined.

Those larger and of the same sort of evolution except humanoid; to me? Are the "grays" when in form at least. I personally do not have a problem with them; they evolve and we evolve... eventually we we evolve into the same; however the symbiosis required is a delicate and touchy matter as far as politics goes.

I do not speak for anyone as I am just a heap of elements with a knowledge base to communicate referred to as a "mind" and consciousness being the only animator that drags this corpse along... the difference? In some of those evolutionary chains there is hive mind... in balance they have spoken back to say there is also herd mind or mentality. Meaning political one like a queen can and does speak for the community however; like herd mentality? A new queen queefs a quaff in their face and off they all go to leave the queen to die.

Of course that means our concept of cloning is basically the same as a monkey using an Iphone at this point in technological advancement compared to what gets termed the alien gray species. They composed of the elements are roughly the same; they have tasks to perform in their levels of knowledge that drags their corpse along... so no real difference as life being life goes.

Ignorance however always looks for a difference... the silly thing is? Over time that recognition that was once called a difference... at some point got called knowledge and learning.

The real approach in knowing all of this and yet it is simply being? Is just that; simply being. Not over complicating things for others not oneself, and making it easier for others where one has in excess of what they really need, some work on building things up to have a better future while other work trying to rob or tear that down... meaning a lot of work is counter productive.

That counter productive is a recursion loop; like a spiral galaxies arms eventually twisting back above and below the larger event horizon and being pulled back into itself.

The more concepts lost? The more "truth" becomes known. The funny thing is the idiosyncratic ways in which we have grown. evolved or adapted in communicating that sort of suchness as greed, hate and that not knowing of ignorance presents hurdles where someone must do a recursive on "them self" to lose that hive/herd mentality. That thought or knowledge swarm that chases one around as if that mental fog or miasma is anything other than immaturity trying to gain wisdom or understanding in life.

Take Care



posted on Nov, 4 2018 @ 04:23 PM
link   
a reply to: toysforadults

Nobody is seeing the obvious, hay fever sufferers can get it on a boat because the pollen travels hundreds of miles and is everywhere, plants are alcohol and drugs, people go to other worlds on plants like peyote.. Apes ate plants, plants gave us our consciousness, and create our brain chemistry, it's plants all the way, hail plants.



posted on Nov, 4 2018 @ 04:24 PM
link   
a reply to: ManyMasks

We came from plants.



new topics

top topics
 
102
<< 14  15  16   >>

log in

join