It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Peter Strzok Testimony Before Congress 07-12-18

page: 24
66
<< 21  22  23    25  26  27 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 02:52 PM
link   
A lot of this today is the red herring fallacy Mr. Gutierrez.




posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 02:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
Who is this TROLL speaking?



Gutierrz!~


He is a top player as a race pimp.



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 02:53 PM
link   
a reply to: JinMI

No, that's a cop out ...what action. What did he do to guide the investigation towards entrapment or where did his bias make him destroy or create evidence. What did he do to influence other agents to alter destroy create evidence or otherwise do anything to hurt trump or his campaign.
Because experts from both sides have looked and have not found any action based in bias. your feelings about the situation don't matter. The facts do.



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 02:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT
"P.Q.G."?
Did anyone get the company's full name?

Penn Quarter Group..

democratic donors paid $50 million for new anti-trump research



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 02:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: six67seven

originally posted by: IAMTAT
"P.Q.G."?
Did anyone get the company's full name?

Penn Quarter Group..

democratic donors paid $50 million for new anti-trump research


Thank you.



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 02:55 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

It's got a nice ring.



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 02:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: loam
a reply to: TomLawless

Those are just words.

Apparently, we now live in a time where clear expressions of intent don't actually show intent. Only a subsequent action proves a previous intent. Accordingly, we'll need to throw out half of our current criminal statutes and rewrite them.



What exact law did he break in saying what he said?


He didn't break one, just said he had the intention to.


Ok. Which law did he intend to break?



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 02:56 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

How would you prove those actions?

Here's a hint, it would be almost impossible. Which is why this is a joke.



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 02:56 PM
link   
The illegal children , the children the children , islamaphopia , poor mulisms , stormy poor stormy and crew. How did Ill. vote this gutierrez in? Cheer lead for the adulterer. Lib values , rah rah rah. Evil republicans made strzok make thousand of anti - Trump texts and make the fbi look bad. Sickening.



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 02:56 PM
link   
This really has been a disturbing day.

The complete justification for what that same party wanted to get Nixon on.



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 02:57 PM
link   
a reply to: rollanotherone

Neo you sure do get around. It's like the portraits at Hogwarts around here. You keep winding up in someone else's avatar.



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 02:58 PM
link   
LOL

"I don't remember writing the email, but I typed it late at night."

LOL

Gowdy's expression was priceless.



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 02:59 PM
link   
For over 5 decades the left coined the phrase baby killers.

Investigate/stop Trump because of 'insulting' some family.



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 02:59 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

The fact that one side says the democrats only act on emotions becomes beyond laughable to me when I watch something like this happen, because the vast majority of what I see from the Republicans today is acting on emotion and trying to drum up emotion. I think one telling thing is that he infact did have this information about the investigation and didnt leak it for months...he could have screwed up like Comey did and leaked it and severely hurt the Trump campaign with an anonymous leak...and that didnt happen. Now the FBI office out of New York was leaking to Rudy Guiliani (or so he says) about the Clinton investigation.



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 02:59 PM
link   
So Strzok says he doesn't remember writing a text, and then goes on to say... 'well if you look at the texts i wrote the next day...'

So he remembers writing the texts that follow a text he conveniently doesn't remember writing... I guess one can forget about some texts when you produce 50,000 but let me say one thing...

LIAR!!!



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 03:00 PM
link   



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 03:00 PM
link   
a reply to: six67seven

It was late at night.



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 03:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: six67seven
So Strzok says he doesn't remember writing a text, and then goes on to say... 'well if you look at the texts i wrote the next day...'

So he remembers writing the texts that follow a text he conveniently doesn't remember writing... I guess one can forget about some texts when you produce 50,000 but let me say one thing...

LIAR!!!


Very selective memory this piece of fecal matter has indeed. Get em Gowdy!



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 03:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: six67seven

Is this the same $50 million?



I knew you'd make a connection, J & C.



posted on Jul, 12 2018 @ 03:02 PM
link   
a reply to: loam

This guy is coated in hubris and arrogance. He knows they can't prove his bias had anything to do with his actions, in this setting anyway.




top topics



 
66
<< 21  22  23    25  26  27 >>

log in

join