It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Susan Collins Signals she will support Trump SCOTUS pick

page: 2
6
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 29 2018 @ 07:56 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

How did he lie? He merely said that's what would happen.
edit on 29-6-2018 by Aallanon because: (no reason given)




posted on Jun, 29 2018 @ 07:58 PM
link   
a reply to: Aallanon
Did you read the post I replied to?



posted on Jun, 29 2018 @ 07:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
How stupid is this? Pro-Abortionists are sending COAT HANGERS to Susan Collins.
www.motherjones.com...

It is stupid. But the term is pro-choice.



posted on Jun, 29 2018 @ 08:02 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

I did and technically it's not readily apparent he lied.

In one instance he said he would appoint only pro life judges.

In the other he said he never asked Gorsuch his position.

Maybe he already knew it?



posted on Jun, 29 2018 @ 08:05 PM
link   
a reply to: Aallanon

Or maybe he lied. Nah.

Couldn't be.



posted on Jun, 29 2018 @ 08:07 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Can you prove he did? I would like to see proof.

ETA please
edit on 29-6-2018 by Aallanon because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 29 2018 @ 08:07 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage


I have no idea one way or the other. Why ask me a question like that?



posted on Jun, 29 2018 @ 08:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: Aallanon
a reply to: Phage

I did and technically it's not readily apparent he lied.

In one instance he said he would appoint only pro life judges.

In the other he said he never asked Gorsuch his position.

Maybe he already knew it?


BINGO! He's not throwing darts and hoping for a winner. History is best indicator...for the most part.



posted on Jun, 29 2018 @ 08:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: Aallanon
a reply to: Phage

Can you prove he did? I would like to see proof.

ETA please

Well, you got me there.

Word games are fun. I only asked if he lied, I didn't say he did.



posted on Jun, 29 2018 @ 08:11 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

touche'



posted on Jun, 29 2018 @ 08:12 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust




BINGO! He's not throwing darts and hoping for a winner. History is best indicator...for the most part.

Let me get this straight.

1) He has a "litmus test", he will only appoint anti-abortion judges.

2) But, since he didn't ask Gorsuch, he didn't really know that Gorsuch is anti-abortion.

3) But he did know Gorsuch is anti-abortion so that's why he appointed him.

Bingo?


edit on 6/29/2018 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 29 2018 @ 08:14 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

If I may, he only stated he didn't ask him. Semantics? Yes but well....

I am not saying I agree with this tactic.

I believe it is how obama believed he would get away with all his .....endeavors.

It's called plausible deniability not believable deniability
edit on 29-6-2018 by Aallanon because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 29 2018 @ 08:14 PM
link   
I don't see how anyone can say they support or don't support a Supreme Court nominee without knowing who it is.



posted on Jun, 29 2018 @ 08:15 PM
link   
None of the Dems are needed, there are 51 Republicans who can vote yes, well 50 plus the VP Pence if you count on butthurt McCain to drop the ball every time.



posted on Jun, 29 2018 @ 08:18 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Do you have a link or source showing him say that. I wouldn't be surprised, but I don't remember hearing that.

Edit:
Nvm, I see that now. That's disappointing, but I've learned to live with disappointment. Especially concerning our Govt.
edit on 29-6-2018 by watchitburn because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 29 2018 @ 08:23 PM
link   
a reply to: watchitburn

Here's the video. At around 11:55 I believe.
www.c-span.org.../presidential-nominees-debate-university-nevada-las-vegas

edit on 6/29/2018 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 29 2018 @ 08:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: TinfoilTP
None of the Dems are needed, there are 51 Republicans who can vote yes, well 50 plus the VP Pence if you count on butthurt McCain to drop the ball every time.


Does McCain feel that he's coming back? McCain loves his country and Republican ideals enough to relinquish his seat to someone else, if he thought he wasn't returning. Right?



posted on Jun, 29 2018 @ 08:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: VictorVonDoom
I don't see how anyone can say they support or don't support a Supreme Court nominee without knowing who it is.


Were you here in America, back in December 2017? Every single Democrat voted AGAINST Tax Cuts for Americans. They will oppose anything that Trump/Republicans are for. It's pitiful.



posted on Jun, 29 2018 @ 08:40 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Silly Democrats. Voting against a huge increase in the deficit.
Wait a minute. That sounds sort of Republicany. At least, it used to.

edit on 6/29/2018 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 29 2018 @ 09:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage

originally posted by: carewemust
How stupid is this? Pro-Abortionists are sending COAT HANGERS to Susan Collins.
www.motherjones.com...

It is stupid. But the term is pro-choice.


How about Pro-LIFE vs Pro-DEATH?







 
6
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join