Susan Collins Signals she will support Trump SCOTUS pick

a reply to: Phage

How did he lie? He merely said that's what would happen.

a reply to: Aallanon
Did you read the post I replied to?

originally posted by: carewemust
How stupid is this? Pro-Abortionists are sending COAT HANGERS to Susan Collins.
www.motherjones.com...

It is stupid. But the term is pro-choice.

a reply to: Phage

I did and technically it's not readily apparent he lied.

In one instance he said he would appoint only pro life judges.

In the other he said he never asked Gorsuch his position.

Maybe he already knew it?

a reply to: Aallanon

Or maybe he lied. Nah.

Couldn't be.

a reply to: Phage

Can you prove he did? I would like to see proof.

ETA please

a reply to: Phage


I have no idea one way or the other. Why ask me a question like that?

originally posted by: Aallanon
a reply to: Phage

I did and technically it's not readily apparent he lied.

In one instance he said he would appoint only pro life judges.

In the other he said he never asked Gorsuch his position.

Maybe he already knew it?

BINGO! He's not throwing darts and hoping for a winner. History is best indicator...for the most part.

originally posted by: Aallanon
a reply to: Phage

Can you prove he did? I would like to see proof.

ETA please

Well, you got me there.

Word games are fun. I only asked if he lied, I didn't say he did.

a reply to: Phage

touche'

a reply to: carewemust

BINGO! He's not throwing darts and hoping for a winner. History is best indicator...for the most part.

Let me get this straight.

1) He has a "litmus test", he will only appoint anti-abortion judges.

2) But, since he didn't ask Gorsuch, he didn't really know that Gorsuch is anti-abortion.

3) But he did know Gorsuch is anti-abortion so that's why he appointed him.

Bingo?

a reply to: Phage

If I may, he only stated he didn't ask him. Semantics? Yes but well....

I am not saying I agree with this tactic.

I believe it is how obama believed he would get away with all his .....endeavors.

It's called plausible deniability not believable deniability

I don't see how anyone can say they support or don't support a Supreme Court nominee without knowing who it is.

None of the Dems are needed, there are 51 Republicans who can vote yes, well 50 plus the VP Pence if you count on butthurt McCain to drop the ball every time.

a reply to: Phage

Do you have a link or source showing him say that. I wouldn't be surprised, but I don't remember hearing that.

Edit:
Nvm, I see that now. That's disappointing, but I've learned to live with disappointment. Especially concerning our Govt.

a reply to: watchitburn

Here's the video. At around 11:55 I believe.
www.c-span.org.../presidential-nominees-debate-university-nevada-las-vegas

originally posted by: TinfoilTP
None of the Dems are needed, there are 51 Republicans who can vote yes, well 50 plus the VP Pence if you count on butthurt McCain to drop the ball every time.

Does McCain feel that he's coming back? McCain loves his country and Republican ideals enough to relinquish his seat to someone else, if he thought he wasn't returning. Right?

originally posted by: VictorVonDoom
I don't see how anyone can say they support or don't support a Supreme Court nominee without knowing who it is.

Were you here in America, back in December 2017? Every single Democrat voted AGAINST Tax Cuts for Americans. They will oppose anything that Trump/Republicans are for. It's pitiful.

a reply to: carewemust

Silly Democrats. Voting against a huge increase in the deficit.
Wait a minute. That sounds sort of Republicany. At least, it used to.

originally posted by: Phage

originally posted by: carewemust
How stupid is this? Pro-Abortionists are sending COAT HANGERS to Susan Collins.
www.motherjones.com...

It is stupid. But the term is pro-choice.

How about Pro-LIFE vs Pro-DEATH?