It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

They're Going After Hillary, Comey, Lynch, And Others in DOJ and FBI For Crimes

page: 5
75
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 28 2018 @ 03:25 PM
link   
a reply to: KansasGirl

For contrast, about a defibrillator



www.snopes.com...

Hillary Clinton Wears a Defibrillator?
A photograph of Hillary Clinton speaking at a campaign event was circulated as proof that the presidential nominee wears a defibrillator.

False


And this is unproven?




Bill Clinton Was Expelled from Oxford Over a Rape Incident?
A long-circulating but completely uncorroborated rumor holds that Bill Clinton raped an Oxford classmate named Eileen Wellstone.

edit on 28-5-2018 by neutronflux because: Added and fixed

edit on 28-5-2018 by neutronflux because: Looked at wrong story




posted on May, 28 2018 @ 03:26 PM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux

Snopes is a very biased source.
And even they do not say it is disproven. They just claim to not trust the source.

The behavior described in the reports of that incident coincide with other reports of Clinton meltdowns, which gives it credibility.

The big question is... what did she fear so much that she believed if Trump won they would all hang from nooses?



posted on May, 28 2018 @ 03:33 PM
link   
a reply to: BlueAjah

So? You just run with whatever narrative you want to believe? Or do you do a bit of research and contrast first? Then draw a conclusion?



posted on May, 28 2018 @ 03:39 PM
link   
a reply to: KansasGirl

I was trying to show Snopes is biased. But does provide a counter argument. Lauer still has a job. And at the time of the supposed hang quote polling wise, why would Hillary think trump was going to win? And most stories about Hillary’s tantrums are with her isolated, or in private?
edit on 28-5-2018 by neutronflux because: Added last sentence.



posted on May, 28 2018 @ 03:43 PM
link   
Note how no one is leaking about these investigations to the press, and if they are, the press wants nothing to do with it.



posted on May, 28 2018 @ 03:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: KansasGirl

I was trying to show Snopes is biased. But does provide a counter argument. Lauer still has a job. And at the time of the supposed hang quote polling wise, why would Hillary think trump was going to win? And most stories about Hillary’s tantrums are with her isolated, or in private?

The polls ended up being wrong.
But those were the polls that were shown to the public. I believe that internal polling by the DNC showed just how close the race actually was.



posted on May, 28 2018 @ 03:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: neutronflux


I guess Lauer still has a job and has not committed suicide.......,,.. you tell me wha the truth is?


Actually, NBC fires Matt Lauer after complaint about 'inappropriate sexual behavior'

Accusations like that are pretty much the standard way for Dems to take down people they don't like. Hillary threatened Lauer at the same time she reportedly made the nooses remark.
So.... you tell me what the truth is?



posted on May, 28 2018 @ 03:58 PM
link   
a reply to: butcherguy

Which is one reason why the Obama deep state sharply ramped up their efforts to help Hillary and hurt Trump. This will be evident in the next installment of the IG report.



posted on May, 28 2018 @ 04:04 PM
link   
a reply to: BlueAjah

So, I am to believe cold Hillary is a big ball of emotion that throws tantrums in public?

So, is Hillary responsible for Weinstein too? Or have enough women gotten tired of being treated like party favors by the likes of Bill Clinton? I think Lauer and sexual misconduct has more to do with the backlash of the likes of Hillary enabling the likes of Bill.



posted on May, 28 2018 @ 04:08 PM
link   



posted on May, 28 2018 @ 04:29 PM
link   
a reply to: BlueAjah

Her failures were many Masterpieces.

😎🥁



posted on May, 28 2018 @ 04:33 PM
link   
a reply to: BlueAjah

So, you cannot directly quote a named source to set the context that Hillary throws tantrums in public. In the context that the Clintons surround themselves with very loyal and tight lipped people.

Or you cannot quote a namned source Hillary threw a tantrum on a set, in public, in a election that polling showed she would win, over one suprize question? During a debate?

I don’t like Hillary. But to think a seasoned Hillary said that we will hang during a public tantrum is a stretch, and out of character.

If you cannot place a named source with the hang quote, that is no better than all the unnamed leaks used to create false trump narratives. Is that false?



posted on May, 28 2018 @ 04:34 PM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux

If you read the sources I supplied, there are plenty of quotes. And there are plenty of other sources if you search, including her own Secret Service protection details. I am trying not to let this thread get totally derailed.


edit on 5/28/18 by BlueAjah because: eta



posted on May, 28 2018 @ 04:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Deetermined

What have they come up with?


Here's the most recent report dated May 23rd...


Newly released documents show Doug Band served as a liaison for Clinton Foundation donors looking for favors and official acts from the Clinton-run State Department, the ACLJ reported.

Doug Band was the 'go-to' guy for Clinton Foundation donors. If they needed anything from Hillary Clinton, they would email Doug Band and within minutes he would forward the message to Huma Abedin and or Cheryl Mills to help expedite the favor.

For example:
An email dated December 6, 2010 (tucked away at the very end of the State Department's most recent production) reveals that Secretary Clinton, upon receiving information that we now know to be classified from a State Department employee, forwarded the classified information via her private email account (HDR22@clintonemail.com) on to various individuals outside the State Department including senior associates at the Clinton Foundation - Justin Cooper and Doug Band. She writes in her email to "print for Bill."

Of course most of the information contained in the email has been redacted (and won't be unclassified until 2025) but it appears that the classified communications relate to the investigation into Nobel prize winner Muhammad Yunus's alleged diversion of foreign aid from the non-profit Bank he chaired (a bank specifically fashioned to provide loans to the poorest of people on easy terms). It is of no surprise - given what we know about the former Secretary's abuse of her office to grant favors to Foundation donors and supporters - that Yunus was also a donor to the Clinton Foundation.
The ACLJ stated they will be receiving Clinton documents at a pace of approximately 300-600 pages per month.

Jay Sekulow sounded off on Twitter. "You need to read this to believe it."


www.sott.net... ys-State-Department-and-Clinton-Foundation

Here's news that dates back to January 4th...


The Justice Department has launched a new inquiry into whether the Clinton Foundation engaged in any pay-to-play politics or other illegal activities while Hillary Clinton served as secretary of State, law enforcement officials and a witness tells The Hill.

FBI agents from Little Rock, Ark., where the foundation was started, have taken the lead in the investigation and have interviewed at least one witness in the last month, and law enforcement officials said additional activities are expected in the coming weeks.


thehill.com...

Bottom line, you have to know that whatever Sekulow is getting his hands on, that the FBI field office has them too.



posted on May, 28 2018 @ 05:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: neutronflux

If you read the sources I supplied, there are plenty of quotes. And there are plenty of other sources if you search, including her own Secret Service protection details. I am trying not to let this thread get totally derailed.



No, you cited whole articles. Can you produce individual named sources and quotes to create an argument to counter the likelihood that Hillary most likely did not say we will all hang on a public set:
A) Hillary is a seasoned politician.
B) She was believed to have the election in the bag.
C) Think tight lipped Hillary supporters would leak?
D) She does not have a history of throwing tantrums in public.
E). To believe a well seasoned politician who according to ATS thinks she won all the debates, would throw a public tantrum because of one suprize question during a presidential debate where anything can happen?

I am simply arguing it is out of context. And with no named source, the hang quote is about as dubious as the unnamed leaks to create false narratives concerning Trump.

Your stance seems to be one out of needing to believe than trying to determine if Hillary actually said if Trump wins we all hang? When you think about it, it really is meaningless? Especially, if there is real evidence of Clinton corruption? Or if it really is a quote, it maybe in reference to her big campaign/ Foundation contributors. Nothing to do with law investigations at all.
edit on 28-5-2018 by neutronflux because: Added and fixed



posted on May, 28 2018 @ 05:14 PM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux

I thought that the statement from Hillary that they would all hang form nooses was not in public. It was a statement she made in front of campaign staffers and friends at her private hangout election night. I'm going out on a limb here, but I thought that her statement was recounted in Donna Brazile's book, but I could be wrong.

Edit to Add: Now I'm finding information online that says this quote was published by Bill Still with the Still Report over some incident that happened in the Green Room after the Matt Lauer interview?
edit on 28-5-2018 by Deetermined because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 28 2018 @ 05:29 PM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux

Once again, this is not the topic of this thread. So, the constant posts are considered derailing.
Perhaps you want to start a new thread on your separate topic


The original post was relevant, because it showed that Hillary may have felt she was in danger of prosecution if she lost the election. The temper tantrums would need a new thread, although there have been many on that subject already.

Back on topic:


House Republican Call for Second Special Counsel A group of House Republicans held a news conference about their resolution calling on Attorney General Jeff Sessions to appoint a second special counsel. The group wants an investigation into possible Justice Department and FBI misconduct, as well as investigations into 2016 Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton during the presidential campaign. Led by Representative Lee Zeldin (R-NY), the group said they would request that House Republican leaders allow a vote on their resolution.


C-Span May 22 2018

H.Res.907 115th Congress


edit on 5/28/18 by BlueAjah because: 2nd link



posted on May, 28 2018 @ 06:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: Doctor Smith


Investigating the criminals instead of one of the few innocent politicians (Trump).


Trump innocent? During the campaign he had to settle a fraud suit, pay off a porn star he had sex with, surrounded himself with Russian agents, and had to get rid of his share of a condo development because the media found out his business associates were Russian mobsters! And that's just what we already know are facts!


And which one of those things were illegal, again?



posted on May, 28 2018 @ 06:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: carewemust

Oh just stop already.
You just don't see it do you?
Shakes head.
Pathetic.

This is not about Hillary or any other dems
Trump is the criminal and trump is the one we had to appoint a special counsel for and trump is the one under investigation and NO Mueller and he are not secretly working together. They're AFTER TRUMP and they're GOING TO GET HIM.

Every week you guys announce the same thing in a slightly different way but it's always the same false hope.
Memos from the house that they claim exonerated the president when it didn't, and meetings to review top secret info to exonerate the president but it didn't, and IG reports that never get released except for the part that works for trump.


Never give up hope I guess.


I thought we were told recently by Mueller that Trump isn't under investigation, and that they can't indict a sitting President?

And why would Trump be under investigation? All of the claims in the past 2 weeks have been that the intelligence agencies were only spying on him to protect him? Do you disagree with them?



posted on May, 28 2018 @ 06:24 PM
link   
a reply to: Deetermined

The source I found claimed it was because and at the Lauer mediated debate.



SR# 1271 NBC Crew - Crooked Hillary’s MASSIVE MELTDOWN at Commander-in-Chief Forum
m.youtube.com...


This is not directed at you.

This the problem with unnamed sources and basing judge on innuendo.




top topics



 
75
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join