It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: seeker1963
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: Lumenari
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: Irishhaf
If I was a citizen there I would be irate, to me that is saying your vote does not matter and we don't care that you know.
To me it goes against everything are system was set up to support that you the individual is supposed to matter.
I live in Texas, and I do not vote Republican. I’ve had to live with the fact that my vote doesn’t matter at all. So, I know how it feels.
Who knows... with enough liberal votes, Texas can one day turn into the progressive craphole that California is.
We have an awful lot of undocumenteds in Texas. A WHOLE lot. They mow our lawns, trim our trees, replace our roofs, bus our restaurant tables, and even clean our houses and offices. They help our small businesses make a lot of profit. Does that make us a crap hole?
Nope!
Using that logic IMO it makes me think you support slavery.
I would support anyone who worked hard to get here and worked hard to achieve part of the American Dream. Undocumented or not.
originally posted by: bender151
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: Irishhaf
If I was a citizen there I would be irate, to me that is saying your vote does not matter and we don't care that you know.
To me it goes against everything are system was set up to support that you the individual is supposed to matter.
I live in Texas, and I do not vote Republican. I’ve had to live with the fact that my vote doesn’t matter at all. So, I know how it feels.
Um, ok. Now imagine your vote DOES match the popular vote in your state and it still ends up meaning nothing because the popular vote everywhere didn't match your own... when you night have won otherwise. So... not really the same thing.
originally posted by: Pyle
originally posted by: bender151
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: Irishhaf
If I was a citizen there I would be irate, to me that is saying your vote does not matter and we don't care that you know.
To me it goes against everything are system was set up to support that you the individual is supposed to matter.
I live in Texas, and I do not vote Republican. I’ve had to live with the fact that my vote doesn’t matter at all. So, I know how it feels.
Um, ok. Now imagine your vote DOES match the popular vote in your state and it still ends up meaning nothing because the popular vote everywhere didn't match your own... when you night have won otherwise. So... not really the same thing.
So kinda like how Bush and Trump got the presidency?
True. But not for the reason you may think. It is not a state which casts electoral votes, but electors.
It is not within the authority of a state to overturn their populace's wishes in regards to their votes in favor of overall popular vote.
archive.fairvote.org...
There is no federal law that requires electors to vote as they have pledged, but 29 states and the District of Columbia have legal control over how their electors vote in the Electoral College. This means their electors are bound by state law and/or by state or party pledge to cast their vote for the candidate that wins the statewide popular vote. At the same time, this also means that there are 21 states in the union that have no requirements of, or legal control over, their electors.
No Constitutional Amendment is required.
A Constitutional Amendment to Change the Status Quo will not be Supported by the Majority of American Citizens from Any Political Party ...PERIOD .
The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his Office during the Term of four Years, and, together with the Vice President, chosen for the same Term, be elected, as follows
Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.
The pact is meant to be a work-around to the constitutional requirements that created the Electoral College system, which awards each state's electors to the winner of that state.
Over 22 occasions, a total of 179 electors have not cast their votes for President or Vice President as prescribed by the legislature of the state they represented. Of those, 71 electors changed their votes because the candidate to whom they were pledged died before the electoral ballot (1872, 1912). Two electors chose to abstain from voting for any candidate (1812, 2000).[3] The remaining 106 were changed by the elector's personal interest, or perhaps by accident. Usually, the faithless electors act alone. An exception was the 1836 election, in which all 23 Virginia electors acted together.