It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: RadioRobert
Impossible. NHS is the besf health care system in the world. Socialized medicine is the path to the future if you rabble would just embrace it. It's for your own good!
It makes absolutely no sense that they cant take him to the Vatican hospital for treatment .
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
originally posted by: RadioRobert
Impossible. NHS is the besf health care system in the world. Socialized medicine is the path to the future if you rabble would just embrace it. It's for your own good!
Science knows best.
Do not resist.
Some #head knows what's best for you.
no wonder they have targets on their backs.
originally posted by: Chadwickus
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
originally posted by: RadioRobert
Impossible. NHS is the besf health care system in the world. Socialized medicine is the path to the future if you rabble would just embrace it. It's for your own good!
Science knows best.
Do not resist.
Some #head knows what's best for you.
no wonder they have targets on their backs.
Yeah, it’s so nice the Vatican was concerned about this one kid, but spent decades covering up institutionalised child sexual abuse.
Go Vatican!
originally posted by: HanSolo31
a reply to: Chadwickus
If he cant make the flight anyways, and the hospital is letting him die, then whats the problem ? If he is going to die either way, why is it so important to not let him fly ? The worst that can happen is he dies. Which according to them is an inevitability.
originally posted by: Peacetime
a reply to: notsure1
Don't you find it rather repulsive that the parents of this child are willing to let it be a guinea pig at the hands of the Vatican? That is a very unsettling notion to me. How selfish as a parent do you have to be to insist their child be left alive to suffer through an incurable disease?
Why do people the world over insist that a person be left alive when it is obvious they will never have a quality life? This baby is 2 years old. Let's be generous and say he can live for 2 more years. What will HIS quality of life be? Remember too that he will have no comprehension of why he feels so bad all the time. Four years of sickness, and THEN he dies.
How heartless do people have to be to allow that to happen? Would he feel love from his parents? Im sure he would. But he will die knowing, as much as a 4 year old can, that the love he felt didnt make him better and couldnt stop him from dying.
Sorry, but if you ask me that not only is a fckd up way to live out 4 years, but the parents should be ashamed of themselves for being so self-involved that they couldn't see how it effected their own chilld.
Whom they claim to love.
Yes, I know I'm being pragmatic. But when you let your emotions take over to the point where you can't see the reality of a situation anymore............you end up hurting the last person you wanted to.
originally posted by: notsure1
Wow . I am sure most of you are aware of baby Alfie Evans in the UK.
The UK has basically decided to let this kid die because he has a degenerative neurological condition that doctors say is incurable.
Now the family who desperately want to keep their son alive has been offered free care at the Vatican hospital where they will try experimental treatments .
For some reason the UK government has decided to not let him go even though it will be no cost to them whatsoever.
Well now the hospital who has decided to murder this child (they are not even feeding him) is upset at all the hatemail and phone calls from around the world .
Not only upset but they have the police monitoring social media accounts looking for anyone speaking out against this and threatening legal action.
I do not understand why the UK would not let this family take their son somewhere else for treatment. You guys across the pond have no rights left .
No gun rights ,no freedom of speech ,not even the freedom to get your own child the care you think he needs.. The drs and the Government get the final say over your childs care ?
Not even the freedom to bitch about the care hes not getting without being arrested.
Despite the fact that this will come at no cost to the UK government or the hospital, they are legally forcing the family to stay in the UK, where they will be denied medical care because the government decided that it was not worth the effort to keep the boy alive. Even worse, the hospital has not been feeding the child while he is under their care, which is now court mandated.
thefreethoughtproject.com...
Hey America you should be more civilized like us and give up your guns. Now excuse me while we go murder this child...
They decided an infant is not worth the effort?
originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: NarcolepticBuddha
They decided an infant is not worth the effort?
Why are you ignoring the 18 months they kept him on life support?
But nah, no effort was mad at all....
originally posted by: NarcolepticBuddha
a reply to: notsure1
Jesus, this is insane.
They're legally forcing the family to remain in the UK? They decided an infant is not worth the effort?
How can this be real? This is a sick joke.
Even if treatment is far-fetched, doesn't the attempt yield data for future cases? What the hell is going on over there?
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
POST REMOVED BY STAFF