-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings- PART -sIx-

originally posted by: wanderingconfusion
He was also paid another 129, 280 back in July of 2016.

link

Actually it was July 2017...while Trump was president. His work didn't stop after inauguration.

a reply to: liveandlearn

Thanks for catching that I thought I hit 2017 but must have hit the 6 instead.

a reply to: carewemust

I was just excited that the sleuths on the net are getting credit for the hard work they are doing and the MSM is left once again high and dry.

originally posted by: wanderingconfusion
Is this why Kerry was spotted with Iranian's today?

This was posted May 8.

H.J.Ansari Zarif’s senior advisor: “If Europeans stop trading with Iran and don’t put pressure on US then we will reveal which western politicians and how much money they had received during nuclear negotiations to make #IranDeal happen.” That would be interesting. #JCPOA

twitter

Does anyone have a source for this besides this guy's twitter?

a reply to: 0311Warrior

I sure hope so.

q1343

qntmpkts.keybase.pub...

Mueller is losing it. Mueller Indicted A Russian Company That Didn't Even Exist, Court Transcripts Say

This week, one of the Russian companies accused by Special Counsel Robert Mueller of funding a conspiracy to meddle in the 2016 U.S. presidential election was revealed in court to not have existed during the time period alleged by Mueller's team of prosecutors, according to a lawyer representing the Defendant.

U.S. Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey asked Eric Dubelier, one of two lawyers representing the accused Russian company, Concord Management and Consulting LLC, if he was representing a third company listed in Mueller's indictment.

"What about Concord Catering?" Harvey asked Dubelier. "The government makes an allegation that there's some association. I don't mean for you to – do you represent them, or not, today? And are we arraigning them as well?"

"We're not," Dubelier responded. "And the reason for that, Your Honor, is I think we're dealing with a situation of the government having indicted the proverbial ham sandwich."

"That company didn't exist as a legal entity during the time period alleged by the government," Dubelier continued. "If at some later time they show me that it did exist, we would probably represent them. But for purposes of today, no, we do not."

[url=http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/05/john-kerry-continues-shadow-diplomacy-pictured-leaving-meeting-with-iranian-officials-in-paris/]link[/url ]

a reply to: WhatTheory

Read the brackets from bottom to top. Message received thanQ.

a reply to: Perfectenemy

That's hilarious. They're making a mockery of the judicial system with these bogus charges.

originally posted by: daskakik

originally posted by: pavil
I hear that's the Intelligence Community's new rationale of what they did.

Sooo, Boom?

Say it with conviction.....

Duplicate

q1344

qntmpkts.keybase.pub...

a reply to: Perfectenemy

I read that yesterday and thought it was so revealing of how stupid they really are. The judge isn't having any of it. He knows what kind of crooks he is dealing with.

[CHINA-CHINA-CHINA] [DRAGON-DRAGON-DRAGON]

Tora! Tora! Tora! [TIGER-TIGER-TIGER]

The tora of the title is the two-syllable Japanese codeword used to indicate that complete surprise had been achieved. Japanese being a language with many homophones, it is a coincidence that tora also means "tiger" (虎).[4]

NXIVM case is spreading out into financial crimes now. They have discovered 90 companies and entities. OH boy!

BOMBSHELL! It looks like the DOJ's case against Raniere & Mack may be expanding to financial crimes! The prosecution has revealed in a court filing that they are aware of ninety [90] companies or entities!

warning a pdf

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
I'm tempting fate and a load of shills here... but, to my knowledge, in 1300+ Q posts NOTHING in those posts, related to past events, has been proven to be wrong?

Yes.

originally posted by: pavil
Say it with conviction.....

I wasn't, and still am not, sure what you were saying.

After the new Q drop, basically just talking Corsi and Jones and anyone else profiting, it seems Q does care about popularity which seems to go against their claim that there is no ego in this for them.

That is a boom against Q.

a reply to: wanderingconfusion

Expect another wave of sudden CEO resignations this coming month.

a reply to: WhatTheory

There you have it like i said many times over and over again. Why is that so hard to understand for some people? Not you WT.