Should we fix Gays/Transgenders in the womb (assuming we could)??

a reply to: halfoldman

and if further studies reveal psychopaths are naturally occurring in order to reduce populations
what then ?

it#s pretty crazy to think that nature and bio feedback can determine your sexual preference in order to prevent the death of the family unit.

what if we find out with further understanding we humans dont even have free will and the only way to get this "free will" is to escape biology and become completely transhumanist !

weird world we live in

a reply to: sapien82

There are a ton of disorders/illness/ diseases that occur “naturally” in order to combat a human situation based on society / environmental circumstances.

It doesn’t mean they aren’t disorders just because they occur for a reason.

A disorder occurring because - in your opinion - an area is over crowded, has a reason for occurring, but is still a disorder.

a reply to: fatkid

That approach removes nuance from the equation rather too much, to be valid.

Evolution is not a disorder, nor are any of its outworkings.

I didn't realize being gay or trans was a disease.

a reply to: TrueBrit

I don’t think any person said evolution is a disorder, I certainly didn’t.

a reply to: odzeandennz

It isn’t

a reply to: fatkid

Really?

I am pretty sure you did... you just used different words.

a reply to: TrueBrit

No I didn’t

a reply to: FlukeSkywalker

These people have no idea.

The monsters forgot to put the “welcome to hell” sign up.

a reply to: TrueBrit

Both are right...


No he didn’t say that about evolution. That’s a big leap..


But if being gay is an evolutionary population control mechanism. The. No it would not be a disorder.


I don’t see how trans could be population control, but gay might work..

The “gay uncle” theory could make it evolutionary as well. The thought that “gay” evolved from needed trusted males to protect the camp without stealing your women..

a reply to: TrueBrit

Both are right...


No he didn’t say that about evolution. That’s a big leap..


But if being gay is an evolutionary population control mechanism. The. No it would not be a disorder.


I don’t see how trans could be population control, but gay might work..

The “gay uncle” theory could make it evolutionary as well. The thought that “gay” evolved from needed trusted males to protect the camp without stealing your women..

a reply to: sapien82

Freaky freaky thought..

Good call..

a reply to: KingSun

Lol, yea and forgot to tell the mortality, murder and rape rates lol...

a reply to: JoshuaCox

But at that point, why inject emotional response to other males, instead of having the “gay uncle” why not just be a warrior drone, like in the ant colony

a reply to: fatkid

Good to hear that. Because I have a cousin who likes the same sex, and she's an attorney and one of the smartest persons I know, and 100% healthy too.

a reply to: fatkid

the thing is its not my opinion , it is the theory presented in the video posted in this thread .

If it occurs naturally by genetic / epigenetic markers , then it is not a disorder but it is "ordered"

the theory is postulating that homosexuality is naturally occurring in human populations to prevent overcrowding and to esnure the survival of the family/ tribal unit

that is order to me , not disorder!

a reply to: odzeandennz

Yeah bud I’m pretty sure everyone knows somebody who is gay.

a reply to: sapien82

All disorders occur naturally, how do you think we get them?

Ifs not like some insect stings you and you get Down syndrome or become epileptic

a reply to: JoshuaCox

I think a bigger part of he problem is we are so brainwashed into conformity it is hard to except that not all disorder is bad. Some things are outside of the normal order of reproduction and survival, it doesn’t mean that it has to have a negative implication.

a reply to: fatkid

Occur naturally doesn’t equal “has an evolutionary cause”...

Everything is natural, only things with benefits have an evolutionary cause..