It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Intelligence Committee approves release of Dems’ rebuttal to FISA memo

page: 5
39
<< 2  3  4    6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 10:29 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Xcathdra

Maybe a dead FBI agent or two. Shouldn't matter I guess. Trump was ok with the risk so...

Try looking a little further out than what's right in front of you.
Trumps giggling like a little girl who thinks this is some kind of game.
It's not a game. there are real rank and file members of the FBI out there in the field.
He cares not. His only concern is himself.

Please show proof of these dead agents. You can't just spout off the mouth without it.

No it isn't a game we are taking our country back from the treasonous dems.




posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 10:30 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

They just got the classified info from the FBI in January.
So it's been weeks. Not months.
www.washingtonpost.com... html



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 10:32 AM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

You mean all the big words don't you?
edit on 262018 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 10:35 AM
link   
I predict this will go over about like that hail mary the deflater threw at the end of the super bowl.

Get's credit for not giving up but just comes off unworthy and self centered.



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 10:39 AM
link   
a reply to: face23785

They wouldn't include anything that trump hasn't already declassified.



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 10:41 AM
link   
a reply to: Martin75

Maybe.
Maybe next week. Maybe next month.
You think it's not possible? But you participate in that Q thread don't you?

I rest my case.



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 10:43 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Martin75

Maybe.
Maybe next week. Maybe next month.
You think it's not possible? But you participate in that Q thread don't you?

I rest my case.

One never knows....especially in this climate....a sitting republican congressman was shot at a baseball game by an angry dem for crying out loud
Who knows what these people are capable of



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 10:43 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Martin75

Maybe.
Maybe next week. Maybe next month.
You think it's not possible? But you participate in that Q thread don't you?

I rest my case.


Is that the same Q Thread that had most of the memo details down before anyone even heard of the memo?



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 10:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Grambler

Gonna keep starting hash tags until they get to where they have to say no? Then they can claim they are not being transparent.
Did you hear that trumps lawyers are advising him to refuse to answer questions from the special counsel? Mueller will be forced to subpoena the president to appear before a grand jury. Season two is already gearing up to be Emmy material.


You realize he can refuse to answer questions then too...Subpoena doesn't mean you have to answer anything. I would go in and plead the fif all day long.

What's good for the Dems is good for the repubs.....

FIF.



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 10:49 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Martin75

Maybe.
Maybe next week. Maybe next month.
You think it's not possible? But you participate in that Q thread don't you?

I rest my case.

Yes I participate in that "Q thread", what's your point?

Your statement sounds awful threatening, are you making silly threats now? Careful there....
1. Republican shot
2. Republican train wreck

See a trend?
edit on 2/6/2018 by Martin75 because: Damn spell check... hmpft



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 10:52 AM
link   
a reply to: GuidedKill

Perhaps the fbi will hand out more of those blanket immunity deals they shoveled out in the summer of 2016.



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 10:53 AM
link   
a reply to: Martin75

😵



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 10:54 AM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: GuidedKill

Perhaps the fbi will hand out more of those blanket immunity deals they shoveled out in the summer of 2016.


Doubtful...They're with her.




posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 10:59 AM
link   
Good! We need balance, both sides of the story.


A story that is FAR from fully written.

Democrats should be careful not to set themselves up here.




posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 11:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: ausername
Good! We need balance, both sides of the story.


A story that is FAR from fully written.

Democrats should be careful not to set themselves up here.



We are to the point where we need the Truth, not either sides version of their story.

Time for an Independent Investigation.



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 11:08 AM
link   
a reply to: pavil

Absolutely! Although, can you imagine being on that investigation team?

Better get your affairs in order beforehand, life insurance etc, and proceed with extreme caution.


edit on 6-2-2018 by ausername because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 12:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: face23785

They wouldn't include anything that trump hasn't already declassified.


Oh ok, so the Democrats are giving interviews acknowledging portions of their memo may have to be redacted to protect sources and methods because they only included material that's already declassified?

That's retarded logic. I would expect no less from you though. You're a fully vested life member of the Trump-Russia collusion religion.



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 12:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Xcathdra

You mean all the big words don't you?


No I mean Democrats are going to split hairs with the info they release to try and justify the lies the FBI / DOJ told to illegally secure a FISA warrant.



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 01:07 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

I am seeing reports that the Democratic memo intentionally contains sources and methods that need to be redacted. Speculation it was done so when the info is redacted Democrats can make an issue out of it.



posted on Feb, 6 2018 @ 01:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: Xcathdra

I am seeing reports that the Democratic memo intentionally contains sources and methods that need to be redacted. Speculation it was done so when the info is redacted Democrats can make an issue out of it.

That would be incredibly stupid, and transparently phony. This is the Dems' own memo, and the FBI has been on their side the whole time.

In other words, that totally sounds like something Schiff and his buddies would do.




top topics



 
39
<< 2  3  4    6  7 >>

log in

join