It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Where was this trust in them when they were investigating Hillary?
So you don't trust the investigation they performed on Hillary.
Will you trust their investigation regardless of the outcome or will it depend on Trump/Mueller's guilt/innocence?
What has come out of the investigation so far?
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
So I am referring to this text from Strzok:
"I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy's office" -- an apparent reference to Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe -- "that there's no way he gets elected -- but I'm afraid we can't take that risk. It's like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you're 40 . . . . "
And everyone seems to be focused on his "we can't take that risk" portion.
Why is nobody asking why this was being discussed with McCabe in the first place? Apparently Page threw out a scenario in McCabes office as to how Trump doesn't get elected...meaning they were discussing all of this directly with McCabe....
How come this isn't being discussed? Has it simply been overlooked that this implicates McCabe in everything they are alluding to? Even as a conspirator.....