It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It's discussing an insurance policy with McCabe in the event that the guy they hate trump wins.
For the millionth time, this is more than just bias. As is Mueller hiring lawyers that have defended Hillary.
But even if we overlook this alone, we still have leaks from Mueller team, stonewalling the oversight committee, and charging trumps team for lying when they let Hillary's team off for lying.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Grambler
It's discussing an insurance policy with McCabe in the event that the guy they hate trump wins.
For the millionth time, this is more than just bias. As is Mueller hiring lawyers that have defended Hillary.
If it's more than just bias, what is it? What is the insurance policy?
But even if we overlook this alone, we still have leaks from Mueller team, stonewalling the oversight committee, and charging trumps team for lying when they let Hillary's team off for lying.
Not sure why you continue to push that narrative.
You do not know who is doing the leaking, the DoJ has been working with congress and there is a huge difference between what Trump's team has done and that of Hillary's team.
But you have been shown that before and you simply ignored it.
Again, we need a lot more context before we jump to conclusions.
AS for your excerpt, it is impossible to tell without full context of the texts that preceded it and followed, but I suspect that was the point of the GOP Sub-Committee releasing just that excerpt.
Also, you are incorrect that he hired lawyers that defended Hillary.
Also this week, it was reported that Rhee represented the Clinton Foundation in 2015 against a racketeering lawsuit brought by conservative legal activist group Freedom Watch in 2015. Rhee also represented former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in a lawsuit seeking access to her private emails.
wow
now you have decided to make statements with no research? www.foxnews.com...
originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: soberbacchus
It's more than just bias.
It's discussing an insurance policy with McCabe in the event that the guy they hate trump wins.
"I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy's office" -- an apparent reference to Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe -- "that there's no way he gets elected -- but I'm afraid we can't take that risk. It's like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you're 40 . . . . "
"I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy's office" -- an apparent reference to Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe -- "that there's no way he gets elected -- but I'm afraid we can't take that risk. It's like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you're 40 . . . . "
We don't know what it is discussing, because the GOP who released that tidbit did not release texts preceding or following that text for context. Nor a time stamp. Here, let me give you a hypothetical (since the GOP who leaked this have given us no factual context)
The Department of Justice released 90 pages of text messages late Tuesday night, many harshly critical of candidate Donald Trump, that were exchanged between an FBI lawyer and an agent who was later assigned to Robert Mueller's special counsel team.
In a letter making the e-mails available to House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, the Justice Department said the text messages had been obtained by the Department's Inspector General and were being provided to the committee because of unique circumstances.
"This extraordinary accommodation of providing the enclosed documents is unique to the facts and circumstances of this particular matter."
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: soberbacchus
We don't know what it is discussing, because the GOP who released that tidbit did not release texts preceding or following that text for context. Nor a time stamp. Here, let me give you a hypothetical (since the GOP who leaked this have given us no factual context)
The "GOP" didn't release anything.
www.nbcnews.com...
In a letter making the e-mails available to House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte,
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: soberbacchus
your version of this is the doj gave these to the house judiciary COMMITTEE then the COMMITTEE gave "edited" versions of the texts to the press?
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: soberbacchus
your version of this is the doj gave these to the house judiciary COMMITTEE then the COMMITTEE gave "edited" versions of the texts to the press?
That is reality's version.
can't help you if you don't get that.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: soberbacchus
so the doj did not release these?
lol
your version of this is the doj gave these to the house judiciary COMMITTEE then the COMMITTEE gave "edited" versions of the texts to the press?
Even if that were the case there are dems on the COMMITTEE as well so it still would not be the "GOP" releasing this it would be the COMMITTEE
whatever you say
originally posted by: pavil
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: soberbacchus
your version of this is the doj gave these to the house judiciary COMMITTEE then the COMMITTEE gave "edited" versions of the texts to the press?
That is reality's version.
can't help you if you don't get that.
Huh?
Splain this then
Justice Dept. releases text messages from anti-Trump FBI agent, lawyer who were having affair
link[ /quote]
A series of text messages exchanged between top FBI employees referring to then-presidential candidate Donald Trump as an "idiot" and "d*uche," while fearing his potential victory as "terrifying," were released to lawmakers Tuesday evening on Capitol Hill amid increasing demands to see them, according to documents reviewed by CNN.
www.cnn.com...
originally posted by: [post=22954307]pavil
Huh?
Splain this then
Justice Dept. releases text messages from anti-Trump FBI agent, lawyer who were having affair
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: soberbacchus
so the doj did not release these?
lol
your version of this is the doj gave these to the house judiciary COMMITTEE then the COMMITTEE gave "edited" versions of the texts to the press?
Even if that were the case there are dems on the COMMITTEE as well so it still would not be the "GOP" releasing this it would be the COMMITTEE
whatever you say
It is my understanding that the DoJ released the info to congress, not the press or to the public.
It's also important to note that apparently the emails also contained disparaging comments about people on the Left as well. Specifically Bernie Sanders.
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: [post=22954307]pavil
Huh?
Splain this then
Justice Dept. releases text messages from anti-Trump FBI agent, lawyer who were having affair
Already did.
If you watched the hearings with Rosenstein on Wed. you would be aware that the committee got the texts Tuesday Night after repeatedly asking DOJ for them. They actually were reading through the texts right before the hearing and taking notes and making comments.
The texts were NOT released to the press. They were released to the committee. The Chairman of the committee or his lackeys shared selected excerpts with the press to further their theme.
* Put another way, if you believe all the texts have been "released" to the press, please direct me to the complete compilation of texts.
The Department of Justice released 90 pages of text messages late Tuesday night, many harshly critical of candidate Donald Trump, that were exchanged between an FBI lawyer and an agent who was later assigned to Robert Mueller's special counsel team.