It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It's not the wealthy who create jobs, they merely centralize the capital. The demand for labor comes from a population that wants a service and can afford to buy it.
If you want to make your donors richer, you give them millions/billions of dollars worth of tax cuts.
There are already countries that offer 0% tax rates. Some offer negative tax rates.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
Such offsets, if counted as income, were already counted as income. In the case of scholarships, the deduction equaled the value of the scholarship, so it was simply not included in taxable income. This bill does change that; instead of being 100% deductible, it is partly deductible to offset the lowered tax rates.
Please show me where that is going away. C lick this link to get the full official text of the House bill.
Yes, there's a war on education going on right now, but not the war you describe. Colleges have nothing to do with home-schooling; home schooling replaces public school, mostly due to the fact that kids finishing public schools are woefully unprepared for college. Private schools typically produce better-equipped students for college-level studies, as do many home schools. The problem colleges are having is trying to help students make the transition from poor-quality public schools to an actual academic environment.
Graduate majors are also waning, but that is due to the fact that many industries have lost faith in college degrees and are not as anxious to hire based on that alone, as well as the fact that graduate costs are steadily rising. I am well aware of this as a graduate student myself (MSA Electrical Engineering, Control Theory / Communications), forced to take a semester sabbatical due to financial issues.
I worked for a few years as a mathematics tutor at my two-year college, and am intimately familiar with the issues students graduating from public school have.
Trump University was a specialized school dedicated to teaching people how to operate in real estate. It was not a typical University. I also attended a truck driving school years ago... it wasn't a real school either, but it did teach a specialized field.
Cop-out.
If the federal government wanted to take over responsibility for health care, they should have made provisions for states that did not choose to participate actively. They abdicated that responsibility. It's on them. Poor planning on their part does not necessarily constitute a mandate on Alabama's part.
Taxes are absolutely a major factor in deciding where to locate a new plant; cities have been negotiating tax deals for companies to get them to locate there for ages. he Dow, a leading indicator of economic outlook,has been in a record 23,000 range for some time since Trump began talking lower taxes. I think those investors know more than you do.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
Capital comes from investment. People have to have places to work at, and those places require money (capital) to build. The demand for workers does depend on the demand for the product, but without capital there would be no product. Taxes are included in the cost of doing business and as such are overhead which adds to the cost of the products. Higher cost = lower demand = less workers.
'Trickle-down' has one limiting factor: the targeted companies. Mature companies do not respond well, because they already have market saturation. Smaller companies respond very well,because they want market saturation and have to hire and capitalize to achieve that. That's why the financial bailouts did very little to improve the economy; they were targeted exclusively at mature companies.
Younger companies will indeed invest in growth, leading to more direct jobs, more equipment (meaning more jobs to produce the equipment), more jobs in sales, marketing, across the board. Those jobs will produce expendable capital for the workers, who will buy homes, cars, eat out, and generally increase the demand for all goods, resulting in even more jobs. That works, and will continue to work.
And if you want to be poor, you spend your time worrying about what someone else has instead of what you have.
There are already countries that offer 0% tax rates. Some offer negative tax rates.
originally posted by: jjkenobi
Wrong. Not giving your money to the govt doesn't create a deficit. The govt spending more then it takes in creates a deficit.
Govt spending is and always has been the problem!!
Previously only excess financial aid was counted as income.
They're shrinking the credit.
Graduate majors are interesting, I think they're going through some evolution right now. For example, the major I would like to one day get is still too new to have good time tested programs made, we're still a few years out from VR/AR development specific majors existing, most that do currently exist aren't even in US or are focused on broader applications like rendering. I would like a phd one day as well, but at the moment in order to get one in a field that I want... I would basically have to invent the field.
I'm aware of what it was, calling it a specialized school is being pretty generous (though to be fair I don't think there's a scandal here, I consider that business unethical but probably not criminal). It was basically some marketing talks on real estate. However, my point was... that's what Trump thinks education is supposed to be. The guy isn't an academic so he doesn't know any better, but the people writing these bills think the same thing.
I don't consider truck driving school to be school either. On the one hand it teaches you how to do something, but on the other it doesn't really give you the tools to advance, only to stagnate.
If the states choose not to cooperate, then it's not the federal government that should be blamed.
A high stock market doesn't really mean much, that's referring to investor return.
All the investment in the world doesn't create workers who can purchase your products though, and we live in such a system right now (and this is really weird to think about) but we produce more goods than we can possibly afford or use.
Small companies produce very little.
Do you know what else does that? Tax rebates.
? I think it's a perfectly reasonable request to keep track of what other people are getting. It keeps things fair. Do you do the same thing at work and ignore what other people are making?
You missed the Cayman Islands for one.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
CNBC is not the arbiter of the tax bill.
You seem to be confused.
Post-graduate studies are not like undergraduate studies. One can get a Bachelors without contributing a single original thought. If you can regurgitate the textbooks and use a calculator, you can pass. Post-graduate gets more tricky. You have to actually contribute something new to your field. The classes are less about learning the text and more about understanding where the industry is. That's why professors are always PhDs and are always active in research. To get a PhD requires a dissertation, which means you have made a significant contribution to your field.
Actually, Donald J. Trump holds a Bachelor of Science in Economics from Wharton. He also attended Fordham University.
That school gave me the ability to make a good living for 8 years. I consider it a school, because it teaches a skill.
The states are not the minions of the Federal government.
That is so wrong I don't even know how to respond to it. What's next, the sky is pink? Gravity is repulsive?
I'm not going to read a 450 page document full of a bunch of legalize...
Bachelors degrees are worthless precisely because they don't require original thought.
As we both just agreed, bachelors degrees are barely worth the paper they're printed on.
I don't consider truck driving a skill.
Really, what new things does the mom and pop down the street create in any quantity that impacts the town, country, or world?
originally posted by: Aazadan
originally posted by: jjkenobi
Wrong. Not giving your money to the govt doesn't create a deficit. The govt spending more then it takes in creates a deficit.
Govt spending is and always has been the problem!!
Government spending cannot responsibly be cut any further than it already has been.
Try driving one sometime. There's a very good reason why the law requires advanced licenses.
You seem to think that 'small business' only refers to the little store with old Miss Becky running the cash register while Mr. Bob stocks the shelves. Sorry, but you're wrong on that, too (which seems to be a recurring theme in this discussion). Every major corporation was once a small business: McDonalds, Wal-Mart, Dodge, Chevrolet, Ford, Caterpillar, K-Mart, Sears, Uber, Microsoft... and every one of them grew into what we know them as today. In the process, they created JOBS!
Oh, and incidentally... that VR/AR reference, if it means virtual reality... you will need a CPE (Computer/Programming Engineering) degree to get anywhere. Expect to need a PhD, actually. The only thing holding up virtual reality is processing power, and there are physical constraints that are holding that field up. Pesky little things like propagation delay, microwave radiation characteristics, thermal dissipation...
Just having an idea of a better way does not make one a prime candidate for a field.
originally posted by: amazing
That's wrong. We could trim Billions if not Trillions from the Federal Government. And that's precisely what we need to do. Ask yourself two questions right off the bat. Do we need almost 800 military bases around the world? and Why do we need a dozen agencies to do what two used to do perfectly fine. CIA and FBI. There are literally hundreds if not thousands of areas in the federal government that we can cut spending and shrink government without ever touching medicaid, medicare, social security etc.
Where I used to live, a CDL was a two week course. I assume they're the same where I am now.
And as a small business they didn't create anything in substantial numbers. Most of the small businesses you just mentioned were never actually small. They started midsized at best. Uber started with over 100 employees, Microsoft had 13, WalMart had enough to run a store, Ford started with many on an assembly line.
Correct, virtual and augmented reality. On the software side though, not the hardware side. We had this discussion before and it even ended with me offering to teach you OOP, which is an offer that still stands.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
A few assembly lines and 100 employees is literally the definition of a small business.
That is an impressive resume. I only wish you had the same desire for knowledge when it comes to other subjects. Specialization is great, but I do agree with your earlier quote. I can raise a child, build a house, drive a truck, design and build a project, develop a theory, fix a car, program a microprocessor, plumb, wire, roof, grow a garden, and a host of other things. I learned all that by doing it... and by keeping a mind open to what others had to say.
originally posted by: Aazadan
originally posted by: amazing
That's wrong. We could trim Billions if not Trillions from the Federal Government. And that's precisely what we need to do. Ask yourself two questions right off the bat. Do we need almost 800 military bases around the world? and Why do we need a dozen agencies to do what two used to do perfectly fine. CIA and FBI. There are literally hundreds if not thousands of areas in the federal government that we can cut spending and shrink government without ever touching medicaid, medicare, social security etc.
We do need those bases, it gives our military reach around the world. The growth in intelligence agencies doesn't cost significant amounts of money. Cutting them doesn't represent any real savings. I wouldn't mind seeing the security state dismantled a bit, but finances have nothing to do with it.