It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

LAPD confirms investigating Hollywood pedophile ring after Corey Feldman files report

page: 12
54
<< 9  10  11    13  14 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 16 2017 @ 09:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
So you finally agree Feldman acted appropriately and gave the LAPD the info and they are following up on it.

Again with the finally? I never said he didn't. I said it took him a long time.


What is your beef then. It is done. Don't complain it was not soon enough. Your beef is with the SBPD then, not Feldman. SBPD should have forwarded it to LAPD if it was not their jurisdiction, right!!!???

No, he knew the moment that they said that they didn't have jurisdiction that they would not look into it. Apparently he had to make a formal report. He didn't do that for 25 years.

The original post that started this asked how many children could have become victims because he didn't do so sooner so the amount of time that it took him was the key point.




posted on Nov, 17 2017 @ 12:20 AM
link   
a reply to: daskakik



No, he knew the moment that they said that they didn't have jurisdiction that they would not look into it. Apparently he had to make a formal report. He didn't do that for 25 years.

The original post that started this asked how many children could have become victims because he didn't do so sooner so the amount of time that it took him was the key point.


You don't know when Feldman knew the SBPD report was dead. He was surprised to hear it when he was on Dr. Oz. He said it the first he heard that. Did you watch the Oz video or not!?
edit on 17-11-2017 by thepixelpusher because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 17 2017 @ 07:38 AM
link   

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
You don't know when Feldman knew the SBPD report was dead.

He should have known when they said that it was out of their jurisdiction. He must have known after a while and nothing came of it. You are just conveniently downplaying the amount of time that actually went by.


He was surprised to hear it when he was on Dr. Oz. He said it the first he heard that. Did you watch the Oz video or not!?

He may have acted surprised. In the end SBPD said that he never named names and he says he did but there is no proof either way. Why would SBPD need to lie if they had already told him that it was out of their jurisdiction. Something Feldman said himself? Which by the way you are also downplaying.

In some other interview he said "“If that was the case, if the law protected me, I would do it,”, which is it? Was he really ignorant, was he afraid of the legal repercussions or was he forced, like I said in my first post, to keep the spotlight on himself?

He can't claim ignorance because he admitted that SBPD flat out told him, the laws have not changed so he is in the same legal situation so I would have to go with my original assertion.


edit on 17-11-2017 by daskakik because: (no reason given)

edit on 17-11-2017 by daskakik because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 17 2017 @ 02:00 PM
link   
I am making a bet, a wager if you will.

One year from now another (or lets even say this summer) a scandal in Hollywood will transpire and be shocking and allegations will spread like wildfire then as per this current trend this and the rest of the allegations nothing will have been done and the tragedies will continue...



posted on Dec, 7 2017 @ 11:45 AM
link   

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: thepixelpusher

That is actually just your opinion.

Besides, even if that was a fact, that is not the facts I was referring to. You seem to have a hard time following the flow of the conversation.


Okay, I'm waiting for that apology on how wrong you were that Feldman never named names in 1993.

Corey Feldman's 1993 audio files naming alleged sexual predators found by Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Office




Feldman's rep told us, "[Feldman] is in possession of the tapes and justice will be served."

Feldman, 46, had claimed in a Today show interview with Matt Lauer that he “sat down and I gave them names. They're on record. They have all this information.”

edit on 7-12-2017 by thepixelpusher because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 7 2017 @ 12:51 PM
link   
a reply to: thepixelpusher

Apology for what? For stating the fact that we could not be certain? We couldn't when I posted that.

How about the doozy you made up about them turning off the recorder? Well turns out that they didn't.

I knew you would be here making a big deal about this when I saw that thread but it turns out that it doesn't change what I was saying at all.

The recording was placed in the MJ file and they told Feldman that the other claims were out of their jurisdiction so he should have known that nothing would be followed up and he must have known when nothing happened for years. He then waited decades to go public. This changes nothing.



posted on Dec, 7 2017 @ 12:53 PM
link   
a reply to: daskakik

So you admit you were wrong and Feldman did name names to the police back in 1993 and they mismanaged the investigation? You said Feldman held off naming the pedos. How does it feel to be sooo wrong!?
edit on 7-12-2017 by thepixelpusher because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 7 2017 @ 12:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: seasonal
That is the collective (supposed) ring leaders in Hollywood pooping their collective pants.
.


Unless they're all wearing the same pants, I believe that would be "pooping their respective pants." Not typically a National Grammar Socialist, I just hate to see a missed opportunity to use "respective" in context, and the sentence kinda flows better with it. Ken?

I hope you take it as constructive criticism, I'm a big fan of your posts.



posted on Dec, 7 2017 @ 01:03 PM
link   
a reply to: thepixelpusher

No, I never said that he didn't name names I said:

In the end SBPD said that he never named names and he says he did but there is no proof either way.


Now there is proof. It is SBPD that is retracting, not me.

He did hold off naming the pedos in public or to the police department with the corresponding jurisdiction. No matter what happens, nothing is going to change that fact.



posted on Dec, 7 2017 @ 01:07 PM
link   
a reply to: daskakik

Wow, still denying reality. Feldman went through legal channels naming names in 1993 and you still think he didn't do it, even faced with facts and evidence. Still waiting for your apology of being wrong.
edit on 7-12-2017 by thepixelpusher because: (no reason given)

edit on 7-12-2017 by thepixelpusher because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 7 2017 @ 01:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
Wow, still denying reality. Feldman when through legal channels naming names in 1993 and you still think he didn't do it, even faced with facts and evidence.

Seems like you just can't grasp what I'm actually saying. Said it before www.abovetopsecret.com...


Still waiting for your apology of being wrong.

Well, you are not going to get it because I never said he didn't. I said we didn't know, because we didn't.

No need to keep going in circles with you arguing with what you think I'm saying and me trying to clarify. If you can't see it by know then you probably never will.



posted on Dec, 7 2017 @ 01:18 PM
link   
a reply to: daskakik

Corey Feldman named names in 1993 and now you see that was true and you shrink back in your trolling of him . ha hah.



posted on Dec, 7 2017 @ 01:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
Corey Feldman named names in 1993 and now you see that was true and you shrink back in your trolling of him . ha hah.

Did you even check the link?

Shrink back? I've been saying the same thing for pages. I stand by everything I posted. This new development doesn't change the fact that he sat on the names for 24 years after the interview with SBPD.



posted on Dec, 7 2017 @ 01:28 PM
link   
a reply to: daskakik

Feldman has the tapes and it proves him right. Eat your words. Feldman has been trying to out the perps since 1993.



posted on Dec, 7 2017 @ 01:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
Feldman has the tapes and it proves him right. Eat your words. Feldman has been trying to out the perps since 1993.

"Feldman has tapes of him mentioning names once, 24 years ago, and never mentioned them again until this year."

Those are my words and there is nothing to eat because it is all true.



posted on Dec, 7 2017 @ 01:33 PM
link   
a reply to: daskakik

Glad to see you agree you were wrong and Feldman named names back in 1993 in his quest to out the truth.



posted on Dec, 7 2017 @ 01:37 PM
link   
a reply to: thepixelpusher

Why do you feel the need to say I was wrong about something I never said?

Also he wasn't questing for anything, other than the spotlight, during those 24 years. Sorry if that hurts you somehow but it is the truth.



posted on Dec, 7 2017 @ 01:46 PM
link   
a reply to: daskakik

Feldman put his career on the line in 1993. Sorry you are too dense to understand that.



posted on Dec, 7 2017 @ 02:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
Feldman put his career on the line in 1993. Sorry you are too dense to understand that.

No he didn't. He told SBPD. They told him that it wasn't in their jurisdiction, nothing came of it and he chose not to tell anyone else until 24 years later.

I'm not the one being dense, you are the one not taking into account the amount of time he actually remained silent, after seeing that telling SBPD led to nothing (although he could have known since they pretty much just flat out told him), and want to call that a quest when it is in fact enabling the "hollywood pedo ring" to continue to claim victims while he asks for money.

Maybe you just have a soft spot for him which keeps you from seeing that.
edit on 7-12-2017 by daskakik because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 7 2017 @ 02:03 PM
link   
a reply to: daskakik

Obviously you have no comprehension of police work. Just because it was not their jurisdiction doesn't mean they won't contact the right jurisdiction to follow up on it.

As evidenced by the Dr. OZ program, Feldman was surprised the report was not acted upon. I. E. He had no idea his report was dead ended. You are in the wrong for assuming Feldman sat on it.
edit on 7-12-2017 by thepixelpusher because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
54
<< 9  10  11    13  14 >>

log in

join