It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Having stable, two parent homes with stable extended family structure helps buffer against the one crappy parent. That's why I bring it up. These days, if a kid has one stable, reliable parent, and that is the crappy parent, that child is almost certainly doomed.
I also know you being up socioeconomics, but understand, if the kid has one crappy parent and no back up in family structure, then you can dump all the monetary aid you want in there, and it won't help. You're just making a rich disaster instead of a poorer one. Money does not give the kid the social, emotional stability he or she needs to grow up well-rounded and stable.
What agenda am I pushing, except one of wanting to have a logical, reasonable conversation beyond the hyperbolics you speak of and perpetuate?
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: Liquesence
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: Liquesence
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
UPDATE: Sutherland Springs Gunman Devin Kelley Wore “All Black” – Facebook Page Suggests He Was Diehard Atheist, CNN Fan
now reported on
Source
Product of Left wing Fake News and Atheism.
Another tragedy linked to #resistance propaganda.
Wore black/atheist/Cnn fan/gateway pundit.
Are you serious?
Thank you for not helping.
Ahh you are one of those who don't like facts, even when there are few to go around so far.
So you admit there are few facts, you're just throwing around partisan bull# as usual.
Thanks for proving my point.
The few facts known don't fit your narrative so you dismiss them, proves your agenda.
originally posted by: Nyiah
a reply to: neo96
In what alternate universe is murdering 2 dozen innocent people, children included, AT CHURCH not considered bat guano nuts?
originally posted by: dreamingawake
originally posted by: Liquesence
originally posted by: dreamingawake
originally posted by: Liquesence
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
I find myself agreeing with introvert on this subject, a discussion needs to be had about what is leading these people to flip out and want to hurt so many others.
My right isn't up for debate. Thus no discussion is to be had.
It is insulting to myself and millions of other Americans that have done nothing.
You're right.
It's not about limiting guns, but certain people from getting them.
And what causes people to snap.
Yeah with a focus on Veterans and PTSD.
No, it isn't.
From the quote:
It's not about limiting guns, but certain people from getting them.
What certain people?
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: introvert
What agenda am I pushing, except one of wanting to have a logical, reasonable conversation beyond the hyperbolics you speak of and perpetuate?
The first sign of agenda is political talking points. 'Honest conversation'.
Which means there is no honesty to be had.
And the biggest reason it fails is because of a well known legal defense called 'temporary insanity'.
Because it is a subjective term to begin with.
Mental issue/guns is hyperbolics and straight up FEAR mongering.
Irrational thinking.
And some want an 'honest conversation' for whatever reason to 'defend' against something that has no defense against.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Deaf Alien
Then I will just sit at my original position that the shooter was an asshole that should burn in hell.
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
originally posted by: Xcathdra
Pretty sure you have non fake news source.
Edit: Just saw your edited post. That's photoshopped from 4chan.
Photo removed.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Deaf Alien
Then I will just sit at my original position that the shooter was an asshole that should burn in hell.