It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Is this an anomaly on the asteroid EROS?

page: 5
78
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 21 2017 @ 01:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: ArMaP

originally posted by: Wolfenz
so your saying it is Squarish!

No, I'm saying it looks square on the image with too much contrast, a better image shows that it's not square.


well NASA even said its Square shaped didnt they ?

I don't care about what NASA says, when I state my opinion I use my own eyes and brain.


Old Buzz said Monolith and said : someone put it there. Actually! LOL

He didn't say that, he said "when people find out about that they're gonna say 'who put that there? who put that there?' Well, the universe put it there, if you so choose, god put it there".

What I find most interesting in that video is that it looks like he is talking to the ignorant people that are easily manipulated with a few words, and that's why he says "there's a monolith on the moon of Mars", when he knows perfectly well that Mars has two moons and that "monolith" means "big rock" (or, more correctly, "one rock", but it's used as "big rock").


More less Buzz was Referring that its Not Natural
of course Sentient made. but.. hey..

It almost looks like you listened to what you wanted to ear instead of what he really said. He said "the universe put it there, if you so choose, god put it there", how's that saying it's not natural?



You Dont Care what NASA said! just Make be they had a closer look at it !
and not reveled the close ups as of yet of this Square object ,


The Hell he Did!! say that!
OMG ArMaps , Appaerntly , you only Hear what you want too Hear!!

take your self back too the video I posted!!

Buzz did say There is a Monolith There ! ,, ( while Pointing his finger up ) right at the .38 to 40 sec mark !

WOW now I see how your Mind Works! , WOW!!!

Buzz talking to ignorant People ! LOL.. is your take ?

Apparently Someone taught you how to Read Body Language the Wrong way..

WoW , Yeah anything can be called a Monolith ! a Small Mountain or Plateau
your right on that!!!

but what he is referring too is a Sentient Made structure !

Especially when he says how did it get there!!

the universe place it there or God placed it there!
of course he would not say Alien, THE Power That BE Is Watching
and ya think there is plenty of of what your IDEA of Monoliths are
the natural Mini Mounds, small mountains, flat surface plateaus..???

as He said There is a Monolith There !! referring to Just One with that One finger Pointing !
so he referring to the Object called the Monolith


( looks like a 2001 space odyssey Monolith to be )
from the Mars Global Surveyor

Monolith 1
ichef.bbci.co.uk...
Monolith 2
ichef.bbci.co.uk...

no what he was referring is not the Asteroid moon itself but whats on it.
the discovery of the Object , was during the time he said it !

as HAl900 Quoted ( My Mind is going )

Seems too me its the same case for you.
You need too put those
Crystal Memory banks back in the Hole


Well Have we gone too the Moon! ? do we have Rovers on the Surface of Mars ?

if you Answer yes ,

then Why is it NOT Possible that a Higher Sentient Being
could of Visited Earth The Solar system from a long ago past
say thousands of years ago , ?

or you think that Earthen's are the only Sentient Being
that would be capable of interstellar Space Travel ?

Just Science as of now
cant fathom to understand the Distance n Travel
light years away come from there too here ,
or a Dimensional Change.

Science is getting closer of the understanding ,

so I Place my Self on the Fence on that one.

I will not make a Judgment as of yet ,


Perhaps Quantum Entanglement has something to do with it ..

But Hey I love Conspiracies, Sets the Mind to Wonder ,
like Philosophy Questions that have not yet been Answered ,
and a Take on of what Maybe..




posted on Oct, 21 2017 @ 03:05 PM
link   
a reply to: micpsi

How is this for large crystals




posted on Oct, 21 2017 @ 03:12 PM
link   
a reply to: Wolfenz

Using you own video link



You can clearly see the object is not a square sided Monolith.



posted on Oct, 21 2017 @ 07:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: Wolfenz
You Dont Care what NASA said! just Make be they had a closer look at it !
and not reveled the close ups as of yet of this Square object ,

No, I don't care about what NASA says on what I usually call "public relations" pages like that, as I have seen images that were altered in some of those (although not in this one) just to look more "appealing" to the public.

And maybe they have closer views of the object, but on the image I posted we can see it's not really rectangular as that page says.


The Hell he Did!! say that!
OMG ArMaps , Appaerntly , you only Hear what you want too Hear!!

take your self back too the video I posted!!

Buzz did say There is a Monolith There ! ,, ( while Pointing his finger up ) right at the .38 to 40 sec mark !

There you go again, seeing what you want to see. I never said that he didn't say "there's a monolith there". In fact, I quoted him as saying that.

What I said was that he said "the universe put it there, if you so choose, god put it there", meaning that he didn't say, as you said, "someone put it there".


WOW now I see how your Mind Works! , WOW!!!

I doubt it, as it looks like you don't understand a thing of what I write.


Buzz talking to ignorant People ! LOL.. is your take ?

Yes, in a way he thinks they will listen.


Apparently Someone taught you how to Read Body Language the Wrong way..

Nobody taught me how to read body language.


but what he is referring too is a Sentient Made structure !

Especially when he says how did it get there!!

the universe place it there or God placed it there!

He doesn't say "how did it get there", he says people would say "who put it there".


of course he would not say Alien, THE Power That BE Is Watching

That's a question of interpretation, I interpret in a different way, obviously.


and ya think there is plenty of of what your IDEA of Monoliths are
the natural Mini Mounds, small mountains, flat surface plateaus..???

A mound, a mountain or a plateau may not be a monolith, as they may not be made of only one piece, and that's what monolith means. And on Phobos, from what I have seen, there aren't any mounds, mountains or plateaus.


as He said There is a Monolith There !! referring to Just One with that One finger Pointing !
so he referring to the Object called the Monolith

I agree with that.


( looks like a 2001 space odyssey Monolith to be )
from the Mars Global Surveyor

Monolith 1
ichef.bbci.co.uk...

That's not the Phobos monolith, that one's on Mars. That one, as far as I know, was first pointed out by ATS member super70, back in 2009, in this thread. That area is close to that Mars "great canyon", Valles Marineris.


Monolith 2
ichef.bbci.co.uk...

That's the Phobos monolith.


no what he was referring is not the Asteroid moon itself but whats on it.

I didn't say he was talking about Phobos, did I?


the discovery of the Object , was during the time he said it !

Sorry, I don't understand what you mean by that.


Well Have we gone too the Moon! ? do we have Rovers on the Surface of Mars ?

if you Answer yes ,

then Why is it NOT Possible that a Higher Sentient Being
could of Visited Earth The Solar system from a long ago past
say thousands of years ago , ?

I didn't say it was not possible, did I? Why do you keep on talking about things I didn't mention as if I did?


or you think that Earthen's are the only Sentient Being
that would be capable of interstellar Space Travel ?

No, I think it's highly probable that there are (or have been) others.



posted on Oct, 21 2017 @ 07:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: wmd_2008
a reply to: Wolfenz

Using you own video link



You can clearly see the object is not a square sided Monolith.


--RBAY--
as you can Clearly see NASA was refering to this one
not the other , well this is On Mars not the so called moon





Back on Phobos

This is Square ish from the top view




I would tend to Belive the reason why it looks round is because
of flare glare. refelction so bright as in contrast


edit on 62017SaturdayfAmerica/Chicago10293 by Wolfenz because: (no reason given)

edit on 62017SaturdayfAmerica/Chicago10293 by Wolfenz because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 21 2017 @ 08:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: Wolfenz
Back on Phobos

This is Square ish from the top view



That's also on Mars, that's from photo PSP_006737_1265, if I'm not mistaken.



posted on Oct, 21 2017 @ 09:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: ArMaP

originally posted by: Wolfenz
Back on Phobos

This is Square ish from the top view



That's also on Mars, that's from photo PSP_006737_1265, if I'm not mistaken.


is it ?

well i can show you
The Dm pryamid and the face of mars and the keyhole structure here on Earth just as
on Cydonia ,

similar objects on Phobos and Eros and the Mars Planet it Self ..

well

let go back too an OLD 7 year old Thread about Structures on EROS

that fits well on this Thread ...


The Eros 433 mysteries: artificial structures on the Eros433 asteroid?
www.abovetopsecret.com...

ohh this Structure in Question on EROS , from a different view angle !!!

Unnatural squared structure. Artificial?

This Object Clearly Stands out, like a Sore thumb ... and Unnatural too me
from the Suroundings .



still looks like a Block too ME with a Tab Hook

Phage and ArMaps.

when you see a Object in a lot of Angles from the Mars Orbit Surveyor
thats a Sign Folks that NASA has some Interest in it well.. I would assume so..


from these pics ,

Apparently NASA Saw it and got some Vibes of Interest taking a lot of Shots of it !



edit on 62017SaturdayfAmerica/Chicago10293 by Wolfenz because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 22 2017 @ 12:35 AM
link   
That black mist that rises over the object is really interesting. The irregular shadow could be a composite of the 'smoke' and the shadow. Such an intriguing image that just begs for better resolution.



posted on Oct, 22 2017 @ 01:46 AM
link   
a reply to: Wolfenz

We have all seen the face on Mars low res first image ever shown it looks like a face I remember that when first shown on tv, later hi-res images obviously not.




posted on Oct, 22 2017 @ 02:26 AM
link   

originally posted by: wmd_2008
a reply to: Wolfenz

We have all seen the face on Mars low res first image ever shown it looks like a face I remember that when first shown on tv, later hi-res images obviously not.






well from a 1976 Photo from the Viking orbiters
yeah Low resolution for Sure

but Im not really focused on much of the Face Detail, itself!
as it can be altered or intentional Damaged
or Photoshop Morphing , or just a Erosion Problem that
eventually caved in.. which seems the case.

what im more Focused on is the Outer Edges of the Mound of the Face of Mars
and even More SO of the Markers . What Markers... Eh ? Well.. LOL
Something I Argued with ArMAp years ago .. the Argument was that the were not Perfectly aligned
or exactly the same measurement of Distance of Each , which i told him/her that it looks like a Landslide
a Land Shift , Ions ago , and it look like it did ..

So here it is!!

What I circled in Black are those Markers / Dots / What have you
there are in every up in close high res Photo of the FACE of MARS


click the thumb for a bigger photo for Detail



and

This is in Iran

A Very Ancient Mound photographed in the 1930s
not sure if it still exists ..

its called the Malik Tepe Mound
Man Made// Artificial


click on thumb for bigger detail


you would Practically see the same thing like the Face of Mars
if you were too see it top view . Minus the Face ,
although some say it was a face just Eroded over the Millenniums ( TIME )


So we have TWO Strange looking Rocks AKA Monoliths on EROS & Phobos

One looks like a Square / cylinder shape sticking out while the Other look like a Huge Block with a Tab Hook

and both Stick out like a sore thumb and out of place...

Cant we say it Looks Out of Place? that it does not belong there !
even if its Natural or Artificial ! ?

Mars holds a lot of Secrets so does the Asteroid Belt ..
did Phaeton actually exist ?
The challenge of the exploded planet hypothesis

Tom Van Flandern
www.cambridge.org... 00F46081AC50

and we have Ceres a Possible Moon of a much Larger Planet Phaeton ? between Mars and Jupiter

Ceres
en.wikipedia.org...(dwarf_planet)
edit on 02017SundayfAmerica/Chicago10294 by Wolfenz because: add Ceres



posted on Oct, 22 2017 @ 06:33 AM
link   

originally posted by: Wolfenz
is it ?

It is, and I have always been surprised with how that clearly square object has been neglected by the anomaly hunters, not because it looks square (squares can appear in nature, as we know) but because it looks as much out of place as the one on Eros, as you can see in the image below.
(The squarish object is the bright spot in the centre, click for full size)



well i can show you
The Dm pryamid and the face of mars and the keyhole structure here on Earth just as
on Cydonia ,

similar objects on Phobos and Eros and the Mars Planet it Self ..

Photos of similar looking objects are one thing, a photo of an object on Mars is still a photo of an object on Mars, not a photo of an object on Phobos.


ohh this Structure in Question on EROS , from a different view angle !!!

Unnatural squared structure. Artificial?

It's not a different angle, the photo was rotated.


This Object Clearly Stands out, like a Sore thumb ... and Unnatural too me
from the Suroundings .


It does look out of place, but, as I said before, it looks more artificial in the worst image, in the better image I posted (taken from the original data sent by the probe) it doesn't look as square as in the other image. You can see it below, resized to fit the size of the image you posted but without resampling, as that also changes the shape of the objects in the image.




when you see a Object in a lot of Angles from the Mars Orbit Surveyor
thats a Sign Folks that NASA has some Interest in it well.. I would assume so..

I agree with that, but that's not the case, as we don't have the object (as far as I know) from different angles, we only have the same image rotated in different ways.


from these pics ,

Apparently NASA Saw it and got some Vibes of Interest taking a lot of Shots of it !

As I said above, those are not different photos, it's always the same photo, rotated.

But we do have several photos, as that object appears in a sequence of 53 47 photos that I posted some pages back in an animation.

I will try to make an animation with all those images but resized and centred on the object, to see how it looks.



edit on 22/10/2017 by ArMaP because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 22 2017 @ 07:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: Wolfenz
what im more Focused on is the Outer Edges of the Mound of the Face of Mars
and even More SO of the Markers . What Markers... Eh ? Well.. LOL
Something I Argued with ArMAp years ago .. the Argument was that the were not Perfectly aligned
or exactly the same measurement of Distance of Each , which i told him/her that it looks like a Landslide
a Land Shift , Ions ago , and it look like it did ..

I remember that. The next time, in a sentence like "I told him/her" you can use just "him".



A Very Ancient Mound photographed in the 1930s
not sure if it still exists ..

its called the Malik Tepe Mound
Man Made// Artificial


It sill exists, at least it did in 2009, the date of the photo below.



you would Practically see the same thing like the Face of Mars
if you were too see it top view . Minus the Face ,
although some say it was a face just Eroded over the Millenniums ( TIME )

A tepe is really an artificial mound, but it's not made on purpose and not made to have something like a face on top. They are the result of the accumulation of debris in a same place occupied by humans for many centuries, most debris coming from the deterioration of the mud bricks used to build the houses in those areas.

To me, that whole Cydonia area looks more like the result of water erosion than the result of a civilisation, but that's for a different thread.



So we have TWO Strange looking Rocks AKA Monoliths on EROS & Phobos

One looks like a Square / cylinder shape sticking out while the Other look like a Huge Block with a Tab Hook

and both Stick out like a sore thumb and out of place...

Don't forget the ones on Mars.



Cant we say it Looks Out of Place? that it does not belong there !
even if its Natural or Artificial ! ?

They look out of place to us, but that doesn't mean they are, only that we don't have an idea of how they could appear there and that they appear to break a pattern that our minds create when they look at the area.


Mars holds a lot of Secrets so does the Asteroid Belt ..

Even Earth still holds a lot of secrets, and we have been looking at them for centuries.



posted on Oct, 22 2017 @ 07:40 AM
link   
Great thread on both sides. Reminds me of threads back in the day when i was just a lurker. Keep it going!



posted on Oct, 22 2017 @ 09:55 AM
link   
Here's the animation made with the 47 images that show that object. At first I said that they were 53, but in 6 of those images the object is in complete darkness.

The first version is at 100% zoom.


Second version is at 300% zoom.


The third version is at 300% zoom and with Gimp's auto levels applied to all images.


I must confess that it looks more like a cube on the animation than we I expecting.



posted on Oct, 22 2017 @ 12:47 PM
link   
a reply to: ArMaP

At 100% it's not that cube like at 300 % the pixels are clear to see and we know curved edges can seem square depending on resolution and zoom level just as

white



can appear black depending on how exposure is done




posted on Oct, 22 2017 @ 04:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: wmd_2008
At 100% it's not that cube like at 300 % the pixels are clear to see and we know curved edges can seem square depending on resolution and zoom level ...

That's why I resized the images without resampling, so we don't have another variable with the pixels changing.



posted on Oct, 23 2017 @ 11:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: ArMaP
Here's the animation made with the 47 images that show that object. At first I said that they were 53, but in 6 of those images the object is in complete darkness.

The first version is at 100% zoom.


Second version is at 300% zoom.


The third version is at 300% zoom and with Gimp's auto levels applied to all images.


I must confess that it looks more like a cube on the animation than we I expecting.




Well this Out of Place Block Cube the size of Small House
Ok I get it that a Possible Cube Shape Rock kinda of a thing ,
that could of came from different speculations , from the Asteroid belt , Rouge Asteroid , Comet , Left over from Alien Mining, or a hitch Anchor of some Sort , etc... or just from from a meteor Shower ('
') Ions ago,

what sticks out for my interest , is not much of the Cube ,
its the extension on the cube , that Sticks out! , that does not look natural too me ,

So what are your thoughts on that ArMAP ?

the Extension of the side of this Cube Like Structure that looks Out of Place ?

and you confess that it looks cube shape. which i thought at the beginning on this thread .
as im not ruling E.T. placed it there , but Who did , thats if its an Actual a Geometrical artificial Object
which it tend too go that that way.

and if it is , Im would NOT be in shock nor Surprised if it is

Hey Some Scientist Believe there a Star (KIC 8462852) out there in the Cosmos
that Looks like it has Mega Structures Around it
i just see as the last Resort



posted on Oct, 23 2017 @ 02:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: Wolfenz
Well this Out of Place Block Cube the size of Small House
Ok I get it that a Possible Cube Shape Rock kinda of a thing ,
that could of came from different speculations , from the Asteroid belt , Rouge Asteroid , Comet , Left over from Alien Mining, or a hitch Anchor of some Sort , etc... or just from from a meteor Shower ('
') Ions ago,

I suppose the only possibility we can rule out, seeing the object is inside a crater, is that it was already there when Eros was formed.

Any other options are possible.


what sticks out for my interest , is not much of the Cube ,
its the extension on the cube , that Sticks out! , that does not look natural too me ,

So what are your thoughts on that ArMAP ?

I think that the "extension" only looks out of place because of the presence of the "cube", if the "cube" wasn't there we wouldn't think of it as that out of place.


and you confess that it looks cube shape. which i thought at the beginning on this thread .
as im not ruling E.T. placed it there , but Who did , thats if its an Actual a Geometrical artificial Object
which it tend too go that that way.

It can also be a natural geometrical object.



posted on Oct, 23 2017 @ 04:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: ArMaP
I must confess that it looks more like a cube on the animation than we I expecting.

Well, you also have to look at the other objects in the image such as the smaller craters, which we know for sure are round or round-ish. They don't look more square because of the image compression. So...? A square asteroid. Who says they can't happen?



posted on Oct, 23 2017 @ 04:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: Blue Shift

originally posted by: ArMaP
I must confess that it looks more like a cube on the animation than we I expecting.

Well, you also have to look at the other objects in the image such as the smaller craters, which we know for sure are round or round-ish. They don't look more square because of the image compression. So...? A square asteroid. Who says they can't happen?

Image compression? Who said anything about image compression?


I include that in the "natural geometric object" category.




top topics



 
78
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join