It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: VictorVonDoom
I assume your eluding to the fact the North had no desire to end slavery...
That just makes the confederacy stupid traitors, since they rebelled over something that was NOT about to happen...
As I said in one of these posts..
It was really a very specific group of elite southern slave owners who predicted abolition and hyped everyone to rebel..
originally posted by: fiverx313
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: fiverx313
History doesn't have sides. It simply is.
Trying to tell us you know the future is simply another way of trying to tell us to already because you don't want to consider anything someone else might have to say.
not at all, talk all you want. you can be as wrong as you want to be.
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: fiverx313
That's such a blurry line...and I'm not saying a call to violence should be legal.. but what meets that standard gets tricky..
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: VictorVonDoom
One side was fighting to maintain the sovereignty of the United States of America..
And the other was fighting to create their own country because "the north is gonna release all your slaves and make your daughters marry them!!"
Which was never gonna happen if the black soldiers hadn't drummed up public sentiment for absolution.