Congressional Investigation into the Lynch-Comey-Clinton Scandal Has Begun.

Congressional Investigation into the Lynch-Comey-Clinton Scandal Has Begun

Sounds like a prime example of reaping what they sowed.

They can push this for the next year and the current administrations haters can't say a damn word.

After the year of the Russia false flag.

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
Well, this is all fine and good and all, BUT...

What really is a "congressional investigation" anyway???

Seems to me most 'congressional investigations' wind up similarly to trying to define the word "supercalefragelisticexpeealidoshus" (i.e. in never-never land).

Hopefully the person drafted the amendment will get his wish - he is already calling for a Special Counsel investigation.

Yeah, I caught that. The door has been opened..let's hope this House Bill grows some legs.

A formal written request has now gone in from 20 Congressmen to the DoJ for a special counsel to be appointed.

Yet another thread full of hopes and dreams, it's like a Trumpette ritual. You all gather together and make bold claims about this and that and exclaim you can't wait.

Then you wonder why no "Clinton supporters" are in here defending her... its because they don't need to. Another "nothing burger" to throw on your waste of time BBQ.

originally posted by: SudoNim
Yet another thread full of hopes and dreams, it's like a Trumpette ritual. You all gather together and make bold claims about this and that and exclaim you can't wait.

Then you wonder why no "Clinton supporters" are in here defending her... its because they don't need to. Another "nothing burger"

to throw on your waste of time BBQ.

Uh, yeah. If you've read Wikileaks emails you already know all about her corruption.

a reply to: TownCryer

The benghazi hearings weren't pointless. Sure, hillary did nothing criminal but she was proven to be incompetent and a liar.

a reply to: SudoNim

Then you wonder why no "Clinton supporters" are in here defending her... its

Because they were too busy making Sanders threads and voting for him.

Until by some 'miracle' she 'won' the nomination.

a reply to: Dfairlite

If you're satisfied with thinking Clinton was proven to be a liar, (...Ummm, didn't you ALREADY think she was a liar? How much did it cost us so that you could feel some small sense of accomplishment? And, in the big scheme of things, that small sense of accomplishment means exactly what now, in 2017, with Clinton's political career over, and the Great Orange Menace in the WH?), I guess it was all worth it then. So, what's the point in investigating her now? To divert our attention away from a failing, flailing joke of a president who's up to his neck in conflict of interests, potential collusion charges with Russia and 'advisers' who appear to be rejects from The Sopranos?

Trump is Trash!

Worst. 'president'. EVER !

originally posted by: Dfairlite
a reply to: TownCryer

The benghazi hearings weren't pointless. Sure, hillary did nothing criminal but she was proven to be incompetent and a liar.

True. The only thing wrong with the Benghazi hearings was that they dragged on too long. Hillary's lying about the reason for the rioting was shameful (albeit typical) but not illegal.

There are many other things about the Clintons' dealings that almost certainly are illegal, however, and I'm happy that these will finally be investigated. The most important of these is probably the antics of the Clinton Foundation, which appear to encompass one or more of the following offenses: bribery, pay-to-play, and influence peddling.

Her mishandling of classified info did violate federal laws, and a lesser person would have been indicted by now.

originally posted by: TownCryer
a reply to: Dfairlite

If you're satisfied with thinking Clinton was proven to be a liar, (...Ummm, didn't you ALREADY think she was a liar? How much did it cost us so that you could feel some small sense of accomplishment? And, in the big scheme of things, that small sense of accomplishment means exactly what now, in 2017, with Clinton's political career over, and the Great Orange Menace in the WH?), I guess it was all worth it then. So, what's the point in investigating her now? To divert our attention away from a failing, flailing joke of a president who's up to his neck in conflict of interests, potential collusion charges with Russia and 'advisers' who appear to be rejects from The Sopranos?

Trump is Trash!

Worst. 'president'. EVER !

The answer to your question "what's the point in investigating her now" is simple.

JUSTICE

originally posted by: SudoNim
Yet another thread full of hopes and dreams, it's like a Trumpette ritual. You all gather together and make bold claims about this and that and exclaim you can't wait.

Then you wonder why no "Clinton supporters" are in here defending her... its because they don't need to. Another "nothing burger"

to throw on your waste of time BBQ.

Why so defensive? Hmmmm?

LOL ... zillonth verse, same as the first ...

No one's going after Clinton, Comey or Lynch. At best, this is another attempt to obfuscate the crimes of the Trump campaign, the Trump Organization and Mr. Trump himself.

It won't work; he's pissed on too many bushes that belong to others.

Keep on dreamin' Trumpkins.

a reply to: whywhynot

Justice? What a subjective concept THAT is? Nothing will happen with this. This investigation will be exposed as the diversion tactic is clearly is. You're living a fantasy if you think anything will happen to Clinton. No one cares now. She's history. Only Trump's 30% want the investigation, and their desire is all based on their emotions, which have been repeatedly fired up by FOX'NEWS, Breitbart, and InfoWars, and similar right-wing/GOP agenda driven 'news' outlets. Rave on Trumpers. You don't have a whole lot to be excited about these days. So have at it, even if it's just another GOP side-show.

Trump Is Trash

Worst. 'president'. EVER!

a reply to: TownCryer

How many times now have our right-wing friends been certain that Clinton was about to be arrested?

Five or six just in the last year or so, isn't it?

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: SudoNim
Yet another thread full of hopes and dreams, it's like a Trumpette ritual. You all gather together and make bold claims about this and that and exclaim you can't wait.

Then you wonder why no "Clinton supporters" are in here defending her... its because they don't need to. Another "nothing burger"

to throw on your waste of time BBQ.

Why so defensive? Hmmmm?

Why so desperate? Hmmmm?

a reply to: Gryphon66

This going to be the best presidency of my lifetime. Watching you guys continually be wrong has been amazing for the last nine or ten months and we still have 3-7+ years of it!

a reply to: TownCryer

LOL well there's a long list of things we can investigate with the Clinton's. Like uranium one for starters... Uh oh, guess who was involved in that? Robert Mueller! Well that was easy to move onto him!

While I knew Clinton was a liar and pathetic excuse for a leader, many did not (and judging by the Jill stein vote, many didn't take a liking to Clinton). We're all just lucky than she broke the glass floor instead of the glass ceiling.

To steal from obama: at least trump will go down AS a president! Never Hillary, Never Bernie!

originally posted by: Dfairlite
a reply to: Gryphon66

This going to be the best presidency of my lifetime. Watching you guys continually be wrong has been amazing for the last nine or ten months and we still have 3-7+ years of it!

LOL ... the only folks that have been wrong are those in desperate denial such as yourself, friend.

But, I'm glad you're enjoying this new season of Trump's reality show ... keep laughing.

originally posted by: Gryphon66


No one's going after Clinton, Comey or Lynch.

Except the House Judiciary Committee.

Come(y)-Lynch-Clinton.
There, I fixed the title for you.

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Gryphon66


No one's going after Clinton, Comey or Lynch.

Except the House Judiciary Committee.

Are you sure?

I know you're from the UK Midlands and all *cough* but you may want to review the facts here before you speak.