Iran is mocking the USA on the Iran Deal

originally posted by: hounddoghowlie
a reply to: xstealth

the iran deal was just another feeble attempt by Obuma to create a legacy. and just like all his other attempts it fell short and screwed the U.S. in the long run.

Well least he didnt sell $350 billion worth high tec weaponry to a nation of wahhabism muslims........

a reply to: crazyewok
This is what gets me, why would Iran go to all the trouble of developing a nuclear capability when the could just as easilly buy any amount that they want.
Strictly speaking they would only need a few to turn Israel into a no life zone. But Israel aint thousands of miles from Iran is it, so they drop a few on Israel and if the winds in the right direction Iranian mothers will be having a bad time. Oh and that threat lasts for a few hundred years at that.

a reply to: UKTruth
Of course Nuttyahoo would be against the deal he has been trying to get America to attack Iran since the 80's.

a reply to: ColdWisdom
So simple English too hard for you to comprehend? From the second link I posted.

Haaretz reports that an impressive list of top Israeli military brass support the deal with Iran. These military leaders wrote a letter to Netanyahu urging him to support the Iran deal. Because it’s hard to read names jammed together without any organization, here’s a list of some of the military bigwigs (all now retired) who signed the letter: Shlomo Gaza, Chief of Intelligence, Major General Carmi Gillon, Director of Israel Security Agency Ami Ayalon, Vice Admiral, Director of Israel Security Agency Itamar Yaar, Colonel Deputy Israeli National Security Council Arie Pellman, Israeli Security Agency official Amiram Levin, deputy of the Mossad director, Major General Itzhak Barzilay, Mossad official Nathan Sharony, Major General, head of planning for the armed forces Numerous admirals and generals signed the letter as well:

Now whats that word between military brass and the Iran deal? Oh yeah SUPPORT. Learn how to read.

#%$@ Iran.

a reply to: xstealth

Of course Iran is mocking us. Iran wants us to back out. If we back out, the deal will collapse and then there won't be any deal in place. The current deal is quite good.

originally posted by: Aazadan
a reply to: xstealth

Of course Iran is mocking us. Iran wants us to back out. If we back out, the deal will collapse and then there won't be any deal in place. The current deal is quite good.

they were already given the gold. they dont care less if the US pulls out now.

originally posted by: crazyewok

originally posted by: hounddoghowlie
a reply to: xstealth

the iran deal was just another feeble attempt by Obuma to create a legacy. and just like all his other attempts it fell short and screwed the U.S. in the long run.

Well least he didnt sell $350 billion worth high tec weaponry to a nation of wahhabism muslims........

At least you got some of the details correct. Most liberals and anti-Americans on ATS say Trump "gave" billions of dollars worth of weapons to the Saudis. You at least recognize they were sold, not given. You're ahead of the curve.

a reply to: TruMcCarthy

I am a libral because I am against selling high tec weapons to extremist muslim s?


You Americans and your partasian binary brains

originally posted by: worldstarcountry
a reply to: xstealth
30 years now just about Netenyahu has been trying to tell US congress and Israeli Knesset Iran will have nukes in 3-5 years. Since the early 1990's. Not only has it not been realized, the evidence show no such programs or progress, and little to no interest in such goals is actually shown from the accused.

I think it's pretty gullible to believe North Korea can build them but not Iran.

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: xstealth

What terrorism has Iran caused?? None I can list..

Iran is threatening to wipe Israel off the face of the map, that's a credible threat.

The Iran deal was to prohibit a nuke, not terrorism.

originally posted by: xstealth

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: xstealth

What terrorism has Iran caused?? None I can list..

Iran is threatening to wipe Israel off the face of the map, that's a credible threat.

The Iran deal was to prohibit a nuke, not terrorism.

/sigh.


Thats been debunked over and over,


Thats not actually what they said when taken out of context with the rest of the speach and the Persian language revolves around context.


The media being idiots being the media took a couple of sentences and ran with it.

Persian language experts have come out and said what the media did was bunk.

originally posted by: [post=22357817]xstealth

Iran is threatening to wipe Israel off the face of the map, that's a credible threat.

Not that old chestnut again! The only ones threatening war all the time are the US and Israel. Of course, Israel doesn't threaten to go to war, that's what they expect the rest of us to do for them, because they are cowardly little inbreds who don't fare too well when people actually shoot back!

The Iran deal was to prohibit a nuke, not terrorism.

And yet, the US funds, arms and trains head chopping Jihadis as proxies to terrorize those it has a beef with. If ever there was a country really guilty of the "state sponsored terrorism" we keep hearing about, the US it.....number 1.

Left alone, Iran becomes more "moderate" all the time, well they were until ol' GW Shrub came out with the ridiculous "Axis of Evil" BS. That action alone pushed any moderation and better relationships back 10 years or more.

Fact is simply that the US would collapse if peace broke out all over. War is good for making people rich, especially if they happen to sit on resource rich land the bankers want a piece of.

Contradicting Trump, U.N. Monitor Says Iran Complies With Nuclear Deal

The world’s nuclear inspectors complicated President Trump’s effort to find Iran in violation of the two-year-old nuclear accord with the United States and five other world powers, declaring on Thursday that the latest inspections found no evidence that the country is breaching the agreement.

Mr. Trump has made no secret of his desire to scrap the agreement, even over the objections of many of his top national security officials. But the reports of the International Atomic Energy Agency make it harder to create an argument that Iran is in violation.

The latest declaration by the I.A.E.A. came just a week after Mr. Trump had sent his ambassador to the United Nations, Nikki R. Haley, to Vienna to meet with the top agency officials, who are responsible for conducting the inspections and monitoring Iranian compliance.

Ms. Haley was pressing the agency to be more aggressive, and some administration officials have argued that the I.A.E.A. should demand access to a series of Iranian military sites. But under the accord, the agency can only do so when there is a reasonable suspicion that Iran is conducting illicit nuclear-related activities at those sites.

So far, according the I.A.E.A. and American officials, the United States has not delivered a list of suspect locations.