Democrats Warn Trump Against Pre-emptive Attack on North Korea

originally posted by: starwarsisreal
a reply to: 4N0M4LY

You know if Trump strikes first, he is only going to martyr Kim Right?

Making Kim a martyr will only strengthen the inevitable North Korean insurgency.

If Kim completes his nuke and successfully nukes the west coast of the US or one of the neighboring country's. None are the wiser. Damned if you do or damned if you don't.

originally posted by: Catalina22
a reply to: 4N0M4LY

North Korea has a maniac with nukes and you leave him to his own devices, people will die regardless.

there are numerous other maniacs with nukes

No other country that has nukes are threatening on a daily basis to destroy America or any country that threatens their so called "sovereignty". Unless you want a 5 year old mindset of a man waving his nuke toy around like a flag and endlessly making threats to destroy you....

a reply to: 4N0M4LY

And if we invade North Korea we will lose and a New North Korean leadership will come to power and continue where Kim left off.

And in a war like this many US troops will die for nothing.

a reply to: 4N0M4LY

I thought there were people shouting death to america and so on in countries that are not north korea

originally posted by: starwarsisreal
a reply to: 4N0M4LY

And if we invade North Korea we will lose and a New North Korean leadership will come to power and continue where Kim left off.

And in a war like this many US troops will die for nothing.

NATO/ US/South Korea/Japan/ China(forced hand) vs North Korea? Yeah that is definitely a lose lose situation there.

a reply to: 4N0M4LY

www.washingtonpost.com... rm=.41b8e1cbd6a8

originally posted by: Catalina22
a reply to: 4N0M4LY

I thought there were people shouting death to america and so on in countries that are not north korea

They don't have nukes. But hey they are itching to destroy the evil West.

a reply to: 4N0M4LY

What about via an insurgency?

You really think China and Russia will allow US troops in former North Korea?

They will be supporting the insurgency covertly along with fifth columnists.

originally posted by: Catalina22
a reply to: 4N0M4LY

www.washingtonpost.com... rm=.41b8e1cbd6a8

What does Turkey have to do with North Korea? I don't see them training their armies day in and day out for a "future war" with America or threatening to invade its neighboring countries. I fail to grasp what you are trying to convey?

a reply to: 4N0M4LY

What does Turkey have to do with North Korea? I don't see them training their armies day in and day out for a "future war" with America or threatening to invade its neighboring countries. I fail to grasp what you are trying to convey?

because you don't see them makes it not exist?
Turkey and North Korea have dictators and have nukes and are threatening lots of countries who are not the USA

en.wikipedia.org...

a reply to: Catalina22

They had no problems endorsing attacks in the previous 8 years, some even endorsed the assassination of American citizens, the last bit was just a lame play on the nature of politicians voting for it before they were against it.

Now Horror of horrors a Republican is thinking about a preemptive strike, so Congress must approve everything and anything... even though since 1973 a president does not need to consult Congress for 90 days.

Holy double post batman

a reply to: 4N0M4LY

Eactly my god weve just got to nukeleate them and be done with it damn the costs!

originally posted by: 4N0M4LY

originally posted by: Catalina22
a reply to: 4N0M4LY

www.washingtonpost.com... rm=.41b8e1cbd6a8

What does Turkey have to do with North Korea? I don't see them training their armies day in and day out for a "future war" with America or threatening to invade its neighboring countries. I fail to grasp what you are trying to convey?

was turkey not paying Flynn half a million dollars to influence the government?

i thought they were

originally posted by: starwarsisreal
a reply to: 4N0M4LY

What about via an insurgency?

You really think China and Russia will allow US troops in former North Korea?

They will be supporting the insurgency covertly along with fifth columnists.

I'm not a fortune seer. I would hope they are on the side of supporting the removal of Kims dynasty. I would imagine a deal with China to install a interim government in NK would be the best bet. The US military would have no reason to stay in former NK.

A lot of planning and deals must be made. Russia. I don't see what Russia would gain in attacking the US via proxy.

a reply to: Irishhaf

They had no problems endorsing attacks in the previous 8 years, some even endorsed the assassination of American citizens, the last bit was just a lame play on the nature of politicians voting for it before they were against it.

who is they?

For once Democrats are right. It is too soon to launch a preemptive strike. But I would not make that a permanent promise.

originally posted by: Catalina22
a reply to: 4N0M4LY

lots of countries who are not the USA have nukes

en.wikipedia.org...

They aren't threatening to use them to erase anyone either.

originally posted by: Catalina22

originally posted by: 4N0M4LY

originally posted by: Catalina22
a reply to: 4N0M4LY

www.washingtonpost.com... rm=.41b8e1cbd6a8

What does Turkey have to do with North Korea? I don't see them training their armies day in and day out for a "future war" with America or threatening to invade its neighboring countries. I fail to grasp what you are trying to convey?

was turkey not paying Flynn half a million dollars to influence the government?

i thought they were

Umm i don't know anything about that. It's new news to me lol.

a reply to: 4N0M4LY

Fine the only realistic scenario I can think of a North Korean military dictatorship installed by China that is more saner than Kim Jong Un. Of course the Kim Leadership has to go away.

It will be up to China though not the US.

A US occupation of former North Korea will be a nightmare and will be 10 times worse than Iraq.