Why do regressive leftists have a weird obsession with Nazism?

Why do conservatives have an unhealthy obsession with making thread after thread after thread after thread about 'dem snowflake cuck libtards?

originally posted by: RomeByFire
Why do conservatives have an unhealthy obsession with making thread after thread after thread after thread about 'dem snowflake cuck libtards?

Because they know their Great Orange Man is a failure.

a reply to: TheTory

An individual? That isn't ANP.

Reminds me of a thread about a group of skinheads. Someone came in to defend the group saying something similar to what you said. Went back and forth for pages with the other person arguing that people label other people to smear them except the group was actually an actual neo-nazi skinhead group.

Kind of sad that people just can't accept the truth sometimes.

a reply to: RomeByFire

For your information I am not a conservative. I am liberal actually.

Actually many of us liberals are tired of regressive leftists wreaking havoc like disrupting conservative speakers, pulling fire alarms and beating up Trump supporters.

Come to California and you'll see why a lot of us are frustrated by the regressive leftists.

a reply to: RomeByFire

They are one of the greatest threats facing the world today.

a reply to: daskakik

It is ridiculous to smear others because of the company they keep.

originally posted by: TheTory
a reply to: RomeByFire

They are one of the greatest threats facing the world today.

Not radical Muslims or ISIS?
Wow that's something new here on ATS. That was unexpected.

a reply to: TheTory

It wasn't the company they kept. It was who they were.

They are proud of it and don't hide it. Who is anyone to say that that is not what they mean?

a reply to: Deaf Alien

"One of" implies more than one, as you hopefully know. I don't mean to pry but is English your first language?

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: TheTory

It wasn't the company they kept. It was who they were.

They are proud of it and don't hide it. Who is anyone to say that that is not what they mean?

I'm speaking about the fallacy of guilt by association. I'm not speaking about anyone.

a reply to: TheTory

Um I understand what it implies. You are implying that they are as worse as the aforementioned groups.

a reply to: Deaf Alien

Well I said this earlier in another post but if SJWs have their way in places like South Korea, they will allow North Korea to rule over them.

a reply to: TheTory

And we were talking about actual nazis.

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
Anyway who did the people work for in Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy?

Their respective governments, either directly or indirectly. While Germany on the surface looked to permit limited private ownership of industrial sectors, the government dictated prices, production levels, and even who works where.

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: TheTory

Um I understand what it implies. You are implying that they are as worse as the aforementioned groups.

I said "one of". I didn't say they were worse than ISIs. ISIS is one of the greatest threats to civilization as well.

a reply to: TheTory

Are you that dumb? You said "one of the greatest threats facing the world today".
Is Antifa one of the greatest threats facing the world today?

originally posted by: burdman30ott6

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
Anyway who did the people work for in Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy?

Their respective governments, either directly or indirectly. While Germany on the surface looked to permit limited private ownership of industrial sectors, the government dictated prices, production levels, and even who works where.

Nice deflection I'll give you that.

a reply to: dfnj2015

I don't know. This was an issue we dealt with in 2008 in the TARP bailout. It was socialism of losses and privatization of profits. It's in unsustainable model which has no name because nobody with half an ass hair's worth of sense would try it. It has been used to decry capitalism, but in capitalism, those companies would have been allowed to go heels to Jesus, not artificially rescued by public dollars.

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: TheTory

And we were talking about actual nazis.

I guess you were. I personally was speaking about how one should not convict one of crimes he hasn't committed, that one is a Nazi because he has a friend who is a Nazi, or because he read Mein Kempf, Or that one is guilty because is was endorsed by the KKK. That is why I think the left uses the word Nazi and sees fascists everywhere, because they are convinced by the fallacy and always use it.

a reply to: Deaf Alien

Disagreeing with someone isn't "deflecting," it's disagreeing. I didn't change the narrative or topic in any way, I simply directly answered your question.