Bill O'Reilly Out at Fox

a reply to: Outlier13

Once again I'm calling out your inability to focus. Bye. Have fun talking to yourself.

a reply to: Outlier13

I support Bill Clinton? In what?

a reply to: DBCowboy

Lerner is about government procedure so the Constitution comes into play. Bill is all private sector where there is no such thing as due process.

O'Reilly, today called claims against him unfounded.

"It is tremendously disheartening that we part ways due to completely unfounded claims.
But that is the unfortunate reality many of us in the public eye must live with today,"

freebeacon.com...

Does HIS word have any less credibility than that of his accusers?

originally posted by: IAMTAT
O'Reilly, today called claims against him unfounded.

"It is tremendously disheartening that we part ways due to completely unfounded claims.
But that is the unfortunate reality many of us in the public eye must live with today,"

freebeacon.com...

Does HIS word have any less credibility than that of his accusers?

Considering it's his word against several others, plus audio proof, plus apparently his coworkers siding against him. Was listening to Hannity earlier, and he was saying Bill had this coming for years, plus his guest, a lawyer on the case (against Bill) said that more accusations were coming.

If you want more due process than that, keep this case in mind the next time someone claims that the Constitution should also apply to dealings between corporations and individuals. Like I said before, this is 100% the result of how the private sector works.

a reply to: Aazadan

So he's being tried and found guilty in/by the media...which automatically outweighs his own statement that the accusations against him are unfounded.

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: Aazadan

So he's being tried and found guilty in/by the media...which automatically outweighs his own statement that the accusations against him are unfounded.

That's the private sector at work. Should the government get involved and regulate it?

I will give Bill the benefit of the doubt and consider him innocent until proven guilty. First...he is an excellent speaker, personality, writer and excels in his work. Yes...he could also be a scumbag which is likely the case. But I will also give him more than the benefit of the doubt because of what the left have shown themselves to be capable of. People willing to do anything to discredit opponents with lies, pay-offs, criminal actions and actors, etc.

Yes...some or all of this "could" be a conspiracy. Time will tell...as it always does.

originally posted by: Aazadan

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: Aazadan

So he's being tried and found guilty in/by the media...which automatically outweighs his own statement that the accusations against him are unfounded.

That's the private sector at work.

The private sector "At work"?
Is determining an individual's guilt or innocence the MSM's 'job' now?

originally posted by: IAMTAT
The private sector "At work"?
Is determining an individual's guilt or innocence the MSM's 'job' now?

Welcome to free association. Do Fox and their advertisers have the right to choose who they do business with?

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: Aazadan

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: Aazadan

So he's being tried and found guilty in/by the media...which automatically outweighs his own statement that the accusations against him are unfounded.

That's the private sector at work.

The private sector "At work"?
Is determining an individual's guilt or innocence the MSM's 'job' now?

The court of public opinion rules over everything.

And when you have 90% of the media spouting a leftist agenda, guess who the bad guys are going to be.

a reply to: Aazadan

Networks and advertisers doing, or not doing, business together is ancillary to the premier fact that news media is selectively targeting, highlighting and judging individuals based upon it's own agenda.

The degree and depth of network/advertiser interaction is a byproduct of the results of the initial agenda-based actions taken by the networks.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: Aazadan

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: Aazadan

So he's being tried and found guilty in/by the media...which automatically outweighs his own statement that the accusations against him are unfounded.

That's the private sector at work.

The private sector "At work"?
Is determining an individual's guilt or innocence the MSM's 'job' now?

The court of public opinion rules over everything.

And when you have 90% of the media spouting a leftist agenda, guess who the bad guys are going to be.

Agreed.
In the absence of any competent political party leadership, the Leftist MSM has now strongly morphed into, and assumed the responsibility for, the leadership of the Democrat party.

The Leftist MSM is now overstepping traditional rules of journalistic integrity, by actively executing the Democrat Party's political enemies list.

a reply to: IAMTAT

Does HIS word have any less credibility than that of his accusers?

He is a well known conman bullsh*t artist...
So I'm gonna say yes.

originally posted by: Hazardous1408
a reply to: IAMTAT

Does HIS word have any less credibility than that of his accusers?

He is a well known conman bullsh*t artist...
So I'm gonna say yes.

Got it. You don't like him.
So, in your mind, he's automatically guilty of the accusations?

You are clearly certain of O'Reilly's motivations regarding his statements of his innocence ("conman bullsh*t artist").
Are you equally certain of the motivations of his accusers?

If so, how?
If not, how can you fairly judge?

originally posted by: DBCowboy
The court of public opinion rules over everything.

And when you have 90% of the media spouting a leftist agenda, guess who the bad guys are going to be.

It certainly wasn't leftists forcing him off the air. If Bill O'Reilly could have lived up to the same conservative moral compass he held others to, he would be on TV tonight.

He wasn't forced off the air by the DNC. He was forced out by his employer, Fox News.

a reply to: IAMTAT

I answered your very specific question.

A lot of people don't like him, that's irrelevant.


What you can't deny is that he has spent about 3 decades bullsh*tting to anyone that will listen.


So what credibility could his denial possibly have?

Considering there is audio evidence...
Well... I'm not sure what you're trying to get at.

originally posted by: Jobeycool

originally posted by: Aazadan

originally posted by: Jobeycool
Wrong he says outrageous things and has gotten away with it a lot.His turn and this crap is nothing but politics.

This has nothing to do with politics. O'Reilly is a habitual sex offender. His company was helping him out and keeping his adventures quiet. One of them got out, and cost the company a lot of money. So they fired him. It's just business, and old Bill has no one to blame but himself. If he could actually control his personal conduct it never would have happened.

liberals could not wait for him to quit.So they found something on Him that some women are easily offended over.Most these women on these kind of shows are after money.

That seems like a very likely scenario.

The first thing they tell you when you win the lottery, before you even claim the prize, is to put a lawyer on retainer. And if possible, put all of the money into an LLC. Because the first thing that happens is people will start making up reasons to sue. There are people who make a career out of trying to get money from the wealthy.

Then throw in an acidic political environment, where the "target" has openly spoken against Obama and has angered a rabid population who have no common sense, and who really wished to shut him up and disgrace him....

Even if O'Reilly might have said inappropriate things from time to time, I think there is reason to have doubts that it rose to the level needed to ruin his career and file lawsuits, when you keep in mind the facts mentioned above.

Goodbye pure evil.

I love that the trumpcult are even finding a way to blame THIS on the left.