It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: NthOther
a reply to: Revolution9
Bob Dylan and Jesus in the same breath?
The times, they are a' changin'.
originally posted by: Profusion
In order for that statement to be true, it must be false.
The statement below is true.
The statement above is false.
originally posted by: NthOther
originally posted by: TarzanBeta
If you fall on hard times, find yourself the atheist soup kitchen then.
I actually drove past one the other day. New joint downtown called "Food Stamps".
originally posted by: Profusion
originally posted by: Ksihkehe
originally posted by: Profusion
I believe that's a rock solid logical argument. It fits well with my belief ...
Said every person who had beliefs ever.
2 Corinthians 5:7 For we live by faith, not by sight.
Most people's beliefs are not based on logic.
"It fits well with my belief that all we appear to live in slightly different alternative universes simultaneously."
I'm not claiming that statement is truth. I'm claiming that it appears to be truth to me which could mean absolutely nothing, and I admit that. That is not the way most people use the word "belief."
originally posted by: PhyllidaDavenport
Truth is not universal...its far too subjective
In order for that statement to be true, it must be false.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Revolution9
Are you saying that SCIENCE hasn't provided us with any useful tools for understanding the world then?
I would say that gravity is a pretty solid concept. Understanding inertia and motion plays out a billion times every day when planes don't crash and cars don't run into each other, and hey those aspirins and antibiotics are kinda cool too.
I understand and applaud your basic statement, we should always be open to new and better explanations, I just think you may have overstated the negatives of science JUST a smidge.
originally posted by: Woodcarver
a reply to: Profusion
I think the definition of "truth" gets lost on a lot of people. Some think that if they believe strongly enough about something, that idea becomes truth "to them". In reality, truth is never subjective. Reality itself is never subjective, only your interpretations of it can be. In the same way that math is never subjective.
originally posted by: wheresthebody
a reply to: NthOther
you know nothing about my "distaste for absolutism", don't pretend that you do.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: wheresthebody
Atheists profess to know the secrets of the Universe, without ever having left this rock.
Declaring there is no such thing as spirits or a spirit realm is like determining whats outside in the world or even down the block from inside a windowless room.
originally posted by: Profusion
"Never trust someone who has found the truth, only trust those still searching for it."
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: wheresthebody
Atheists profess to know the secrets of the Universe, without ever having left this rock.
Declaring there is no such thing as spirits or a spirit realm is like determining whats outside in the world or even down the block from inside a windowless room.
Can you give an example?
You will have to put this into a real life scenario for it to be interpreted. It is too far removed from any actual event or idea to make any sense of. But it sounds like a reiteration of my post that you quoted.
originally posted by: TarzanBeta
originally posted by: Woodcarver
a reply to: Profusion
I think the definition of "truth" gets lost on a lot of people. Some think that if they believe strongly enough about something, that idea becomes truth "to them". In reality, truth is never subjective. Reality itself is never subjective, only your interpretations of it can be. In the same way that math is never subjective.
Truth isn't subjective. But it's the people who disbelieve those who have experienced and are telling the truth who point at those that know and say, "Truth isn't subjective! If it was true, I'd know it, too!" That is because the people pointing the finger and accusing are actually the ones relying on their subjective truth instead of understanding their own experiences in order to discern the objective truth. There truly is no private interpretation of truth. But there are private experiences for we are individuals. Those that are honest come to truth.
Now none of us are perfect. Sometimes we lack understanding that another honest person can help us to see. But that does not discount our honest, even if limited, understanding of reality.
what do you mean by "experienced"? Because subjective experiences are not to be considered " truth". Like if you experience god in your head every day. That is a subjective experience. Not a truth.
it's the people who disbelieve those who have experienced and are telling the truth who point at those that know and say,