Judge Napolitano Returns On Fox News, Stands By Claim Brits Spied On Trump

a reply to: burntheships

Yet to date they have nothing,

I am amazed at how squeaky clean the guy must be ,seeing they have not produced any dirt on him .I feel almost ashamed for thinking he was probably as bad as the rest . I really need to watch that broad brush I dig out at times ...I even think that some liberals don't deserve the broad brush but I have been wrong before so ...just sayin

a reply to: xuenchen

It looks like the swamp is still draining, could take a few more months to finish the job.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
Does he still stand by his claim of being a "judge" too?

He served as a New Jersey Superior Court judge from 1987 to 1995

Napolitano is vindicated too?

Awesome!

Where's the link with the evidence that GCHQ spied on Trump at Obama's request?

originally posted by: Gryphon66
Napolitano is vindicated too?

Awesome!

Where's the link with the evidence that GCHQ spied on Trump at Obama's request?

Classified at the time

a reply to: Sillyolme

" A visiting Professor at Brooklyn Law School, and has Written Nine Books on Legal and Political Subjects ."

One of the Best Judges to Ever come out of my State . A Constitutional Scholar Par Excellence .

a reply to: xuenchen

SO ... non-existent.

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: Sillyolme

" A visiting Professor at Brooklyn Law School, and has Written Nine Books on Legal and Political Subjects ."

One of the Best Judges to Ever come out of my State . A Constitutional Scholar Par Excellence .

Well we've got a reality TV performer as President, might as well have one as a "respected legal authority."

Of course, 8 years is a really short legal career. He's been on TV and radio twice as long.

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: xuenchen

SO ... non-existent.

Only in your mind.

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: xuenchen

SO ... non-existent.

classified does NOT mean non-existent....it means you need the proper clearance and need to know to see it.

That's why all TS/SCI is compartmented.......you only see what you need to see to do your job.

I had a TS/SCI clearance, Q clearance when I was with the FBI and the rest of my time with Army Intelligence....I still couldn't access classified information that was beyond my scope of duties.

To you, it's non-existent because that fits your narrative.... it just only shows how naive you are about clearances and how they work.

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit

originally posted by: Snarl

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: eisegesis

so they can then somehow Steal that Information from them

No stealing is required at all.

Just cooperation.

I Doubt the Chinese or North Koreans are Offering Anything to U.S. Intelligence Agencies out of the Goodness of their Hearts . Even the British don't Give Anything Up for Free.....

It'd be pretty safe to rule out the North Koreans. I have no first-hand knowledge of information sharing between the US and China. Between Japan and the US ... yeah. Same with the South Koreans. But, neither of those have the same depth of cooperation you see with the UK, Canada and Australia. In certain lanes and in certain venues the US can be more cooperative with Japan and South Korea.

It's been a system that's worked for decades. Trump got his wittle feweens hurt and stamped his feet over it.

What Napolitano said about a developing story got my attention. I am real curious why he was off-air for 10 days.

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: Sillyolme

" A visiting Professor at Brooklyn Law School, and has Written Nine Books on Legal and Political Subjects ."

One of the Best Judges to Ever come out of my State . A Constitutional Scholar Par Excellence .

Well we've got a reality TV performer as President, might as well have one as a "respected legal authority."

Of course, 8 years is a really short legal career. He's been on TV and radio twice as long.

And your Point is >?

The Rat Pack's Legendary SDJ !!



Buck

a reply to: Zanti Misfit

If he were a Democrat on MSNBC with the same experience you'd say he was a hack?

I just implied it.

Wow
I don't think fox would let him double down on his claim if it was false.

a reply to: Gryphon66

Bryan Williams you say?

originally posted by: shooterbrody
Wow
I don't think fox would let him double down on his claim if it was false.

Really, that seems like their standard policies with the infotainment talent.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Gryphon66

Bryan Williams you say?

Has Brian Williams been a reality TV personality for twice as long as he was a Judge?

a reply to: Gryphon66

Well he got shot at
Flew in with navy seals
Survived his chopper hit by an rpg


While nappys claim is suspect he isn't a full blown liar liar pants on fire like williams.

a reply to: Gryphon66

You surely have a source for your claim?


Really, that seems like their standard policies with the infotainment talent