It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Judge Napolitano Returns On Fox News, Stands By Claim Brits Spied On Trump

page: 3
20
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 29 2017 @ 10:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Gryphon66

Well he got shot at
Flew in with navy seals
Survived his chopper hit by an rpg


While nappys claim is suspect he isn't a full blown liar liar pants on fire like williams.


So ... the comparison makes sense because ... ? They're both on TV?

Napolitano's claim is not "suspect" it's absurdly unprovable. Which is why he got away with it the first and second time.

Perhaps the White House will have the good sense to avoid repeating it again.




posted on Mar, 29 2017 @ 10:48 PM
link   
a reply to: RickinVa

So ... have you seen this evidence?

Has Xuenchen?

Has anyone seen such evidence that you can prove?

Unless you want to argue (again) from ignorance, perhaps you'd better reconsider your claim.



posted on Mar, 29 2017 @ 10:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: the2ofusr1
a reply to: burntheships
I am amazed at how squeaky clean the guy must be ,seeing they have not produced any dirt on him .


They would not hesitate for a second if they had anything.


I feel almost ashamed for thinking he was probably as bad as the rest . I really need to watch that broad brush I dig out at times ...I even think that some liberals don't deserve the broad brush but I have been wrong before so ...just sayin


Broad brush is easy to paint with, thing is the DNC does
not need any covering, they are imploding on their own.

I'm still curious as to who is leading the Democrats?
Only name that comes up is Obama.



edit on 29-3-2017 by burntheships because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 29 2017 @ 10:49 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

Williams lies are proven
Nappys claim has not been proven a williams yet.



posted on Mar, 30 2017 @ 01:06 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: RickinVa

So ... have you seen this evidence?

Has Xuenchen?

Has anyone seen such evidence that you can prove?

Unless you want to argue (again) from ignorance, perhaps you'd better reconsider your claim.


So I guess when the senate does their closed doors hearings to discuss the classified information, that will be non-existent because none of us will be allowed to see it, unless it is leaked, which is illegal.

Your argument is invalid and pointless.

When the information that can be made public by the senators, you will still not see the the actual source documents. You will have to take them at their word, which you obviously will not do unless you see the classified documents for yourself.

It won't happen...unless someone leaks them, and that person should go to jail for doing so. Period.


edit on R112017-03-30T01:11:22-05:00k113Vam by RickinVa because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 31 2017 @ 06:30 AM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
Wow
I don't think fox would let him double down on his claim if it was false.

I'm quite surprised how little 'people' know about what goes on. I mean people who should know. I guess 'compartmentalization' is much more effective than I ever gave it credit for.

I really am curious why he was 'pulled from the air'. It's almost like somebody wanted to point their finger ... and then nothing. This is how things become hidden in plain sight.



new topics

top topics
 
20
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join